Biomechanical testing of osteosynthetic locking plates for proximal humeral shaft fractures - a systematic literature review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Christian Halbauer, Felix Capanni, Isabel Bertusch, Andreas Paech, Tobias Merkle, Tomas Da Silva
{"title":"Biomechanical testing of osteosynthetic locking plates for proximal humeral shaft fractures - a systematic literature review.","authors":"Christian Halbauer, Felix Capanni, Isabel Bertusch, Andreas Paech, Tobias Merkle, Tomas Da Silva","doi":"10.1515/bmt-2023-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proximal humeral shaft fractures can be treated with helically deformed bone plates to reduce the risk of iatrogenic nerve lesion. Controversially to this common surgical technique that was first established in 1999, no biomechanical investigation on humeral helical plating is recorded by other reviews, which focus on proximal fractures exclusively. Does an additional scope for shaft fractures reveal findings of helical testing? The present systematic literature review was performed based on guidelines by Kitchenham et al. to systematically search and synthesize literature regarding biomechanical testing of osteosynthetic systems for proximal humeral shaft fractures. Therefore, a systematic approach to search and screen literature was defined beforehand and applied on the findings of the database PubMed<sup>®</sup>. Synthesized information of the included literature was categorized, summarized and analyzed via descriptive statistics. Out of 192 findings, 22 publications were included for qualitative synthesis. A wide range of different test methods was identified, leading to a suboptimal comparability of specific results between studies. Overall, 54 biomechanical test scenarios were identified and compared. Physiological based boundary conditions (PB-BC) were referenced in 7 publications only. One study of testing straight and helical dynamic compression plates without PB-BCs was identified, showing significant differences under compressional loading. The absence of test standards of specific fields like humeral fractures lead to a high variance in biomechanical testing of osteosynthetic locking plates for proximal humeral shaft fractures. Physiological approaches offer realistic test scenarios but need to be uniformed for enhanced comparability between studies. The impact of helically deformed locking plates under PB-BC was not identified in literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":8900,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik","volume":" ","pages":"553-561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2023-0039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proximal humeral shaft fractures can be treated with helically deformed bone plates to reduce the risk of iatrogenic nerve lesion. Controversially to this common surgical technique that was first established in 1999, no biomechanical investigation on humeral helical plating is recorded by other reviews, which focus on proximal fractures exclusively. Does an additional scope for shaft fractures reveal findings of helical testing? The present systematic literature review was performed based on guidelines by Kitchenham et al. to systematically search and synthesize literature regarding biomechanical testing of osteosynthetic systems for proximal humeral shaft fractures. Therefore, a systematic approach to search and screen literature was defined beforehand and applied on the findings of the database PubMed®. Synthesized information of the included literature was categorized, summarized and analyzed via descriptive statistics. Out of 192 findings, 22 publications were included for qualitative synthesis. A wide range of different test methods was identified, leading to a suboptimal comparability of specific results between studies. Overall, 54 biomechanical test scenarios were identified and compared. Physiological based boundary conditions (PB-BC) were referenced in 7 publications only. One study of testing straight and helical dynamic compression plates without PB-BCs was identified, showing significant differences under compressional loading. The absence of test standards of specific fields like humeral fractures lead to a high variance in biomechanical testing of osteosynthetic locking plates for proximal humeral shaft fractures. Physiological approaches offer realistic test scenarios but need to be uniformed for enhanced comparability between studies. The impact of helically deformed locking plates under PB-BC was not identified in literature.

肱骨近端骨折骨合成锁定钢板的生物力学试验-系统文献综述。
肱骨近端骨折可用螺旋形骨板治疗,以减少医源性神经损伤的风险。对于1999年首次建立的这种常见手术技术,有争议的是,其他文献没有记录肱骨螺旋钢板的生物力学研究,这些文献只关注近端骨折。额外的轴骨折范围是否揭示了螺旋测试的结果?本系统文献综述是根据Kitchenham等人的指南进行的,目的是系统地检索和综合有关肱骨近端骨折骨合成系统生物力学测试的文献。因此,事先定义了一种系统的搜索和筛选文献的方法,并将其应用于PubMed®数据库的发现。对纳入文献的综合信息进行分类、汇总和描述性统计分析。在192项研究结果中,22份出版物被纳入定性综合。确定了各种不同的测试方法,导致研究之间特定结果的可比性不够理想。总体而言,确定并比较了54种生物力学测试方案。生理边界条件(physical based boundary conditions, PB-BC)仅在7篇文献中被引用。一项研究确定了不含pb - bc的直线和螺旋动压板的测试,在压缩载荷下显示出显着差异。由于缺乏肱骨骨折等特定领域的测试标准,导致肱骨近端骨折的骨合成锁定钢板生物力学测试差异很大。生理方法提供了现实的测试场景,但需要统一,以增强研究之间的可比性。螺旋变形锁定板在PB-BC下的影响尚未在文献中确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik (BMT) is a high-quality forum for the exchange of knowledge in the fields of biomedical engineering, medical information technology and biotechnology/bioengineering. As an established journal with a tradition of more than 60 years, BMT addresses engineers, natural scientists, and clinicians working in research, industry, or clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信