American Muslim Engagement With Advance Care Planning: Insights From a Community Survey.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Raudah M Yunus, Rosie Duivenbode, Aasim I Padela
{"title":"American Muslim Engagement With Advance Care Planning: Insights From a Community Survey.","authors":"Raudah M Yunus, Rosie Duivenbode, Aasim I Padela","doi":"10.1177/10499091231198216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Objectives:</b> Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a critical tool in advancing patient self-determination in health care delivery. Despite increasing research into racial/ethnic minorities' engagement with ACP in the US, studies on Muslim Americans are relatively scarce. We aimed to examine levels of ACP engagement among Muslim adults and measure associations between socio-demographic and religiosity characteristics and ACP engagement. <b>Methodology:</b> This was a survey study among Muslims attending mosque seminars in Chicago and Washington DC. Religiosity characteristics were assessed using a modified version of the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL) and the Psychological Measure of Islamic Religiousness (PMIR). ACP engagement was measured by the 4-item ACP Engagement Survey (4-ACPES) and 2 additional items covering ACP religious dimensions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0. <b>Results:</b> Out of 152 respondents, 56.2% to 72.6% were in the pre-contemplation stage of ACP across the 6 ACP items. Bivariate analyses showed that ACP engagement was correlated with participant age, ethnicity, duration of stay in the US and country of birth. Multivariable analyses demonstrated no association between religiosity characteristics and ACP engagement; independent predictors of ACP engagement were race/ethnicity (being South Asian), country of birth (born outside the US) and duration of stay in the US (longer years). <b>Discussion/Conclusion:</b> Our study suggests that American Muslims are largely unprepared to engage with ACP. Moreover, religiosity does not predict ACP engagement. We call for greater community outreach and educational programs that instill awareness and knowledge on the importance of ACP, and provide resources for tailored religiously-oriented conversations that assist individuals with ACP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"405-413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231198216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a critical tool in advancing patient self-determination in health care delivery. Despite increasing research into racial/ethnic minorities' engagement with ACP in the US, studies on Muslim Americans are relatively scarce. We aimed to examine levels of ACP engagement among Muslim adults and measure associations between socio-demographic and religiosity characteristics and ACP engagement. Methodology: This was a survey study among Muslims attending mosque seminars in Chicago and Washington DC. Religiosity characteristics were assessed using a modified version of the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL) and the Psychological Measure of Islamic Religiousness (PMIR). ACP engagement was measured by the 4-item ACP Engagement Survey (4-ACPES) and 2 additional items covering ACP religious dimensions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0. Results: Out of 152 respondents, 56.2% to 72.6% were in the pre-contemplation stage of ACP across the 6 ACP items. Bivariate analyses showed that ACP engagement was correlated with participant age, ethnicity, duration of stay in the US and country of birth. Multivariable analyses demonstrated no association between religiosity characteristics and ACP engagement; independent predictors of ACP engagement were race/ethnicity (being South Asian), country of birth (born outside the US) and duration of stay in the US (longer years). Discussion/Conclusion: Our study suggests that American Muslims are largely unprepared to engage with ACP. Moreover, religiosity does not predict ACP engagement. We call for greater community outreach and educational programs that instill awareness and knowledge on the importance of ACP, and provide resources for tailored religiously-oriented conversations that assist individuals with ACP.

美国穆斯林参与预先护理规划:一项社区调查的启示。
背景与目标:预先护理计划(ACP)是在医疗保健服务中促进患者自主决定的重要工具。尽管美国对少数种族/族裔参与 ACP 的研究越来越多,但对美国穆斯林的研究却相对较少。我们旨在研究穆斯林成年人参与 ACP 的程度,并测量社会人口特征和宗教信仰特征与参与 ACP 之间的关联。研究方法:这是一项针对参加芝加哥和华盛顿特区清真寺研讨会的穆斯林的调查研究。使用杜克大学宗教指数 (DUREL) 和伊斯兰宗教心理测量 (PMIR) 的修订版评估宗教信仰特征。ACP 参与度通过 4 个项目的 ACP 参与度调查 (4-ACPES) 和另外 2 个涵盖 ACP 宗教维度的项目进行测量。统计分析使用 SPSS 28.0 进行。结果:在 152 名受访者中,56.2%-72.6% 的受访者在 6 个 ACP 项目中处于 ACP 的前期考虑阶段。双变量分析表明,ACP 参与度与受访者的年龄、种族、在美停留时间和出生国相关。多变量分析表明,宗教信仰特征与参与 ACP 没有关联;参与 ACP 的独立预测因素是种族/民族(南亚人)、出生国(在美国境外出生)和在美国逗留时间(较长年份)。讨论/结论:我们的研究表明,美国穆斯林在很大程度上没有做好参与 ACP 的准备。此外,宗教信仰并不能预测参与 ACP 的程度。我们呼吁加大社区宣传和教育计划的力度,灌输有关 ACP 重要性的意识和知识,并提供资源进行有针对性的、以宗教为导向的对话,为 ACP 患者提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信