Diagnostic performance of the 2022 KLCA-NCC criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging with extracellular contrast and hepatobiliary agents: comparison with the 2018 KLCA-NCC criteria.

Journal of Liver Cancer Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-23 DOI:10.17998/jlc.2023.02.07
Ja Kyung Yoon, Sunyoung Lee, Jeong Ah Hwang, Ji Eun Lee, Seung-Seob Kim, Myeong-Jin Kim
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of the 2022 KLCA-NCC criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging with extracellular contrast and hepatobiliary agents: comparison with the 2018 KLCA-NCC criteria.","authors":"Ja Kyung Yoon, Sunyoung Lee, Jeong Ah Hwang, Ji Eun Lee, Seung-Seob Kim, Myeong-Jin Kim","doi":"10.17998/jlc.2023.02.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>This study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of 2022 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) imaging criteria compared with the 2018 KLCA-NCC for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 415 treatment-naïve patients (152 patients who underwent extracellular contrast agent [ECA]-MRI and 263 who underwent hepatobiliary agent [HBA]-MRI; 535 lesions, including 412 HCCs) with a high risk of HCC who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI. Two readers evaluated all lesions according to the 2018 and 2022 KLCA-NCC imaging diagnostic criteria, and the per-lesion diagnostic performances were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In \"definite\" HCC category of both 2018 and 2022 KLCA-NCC, HBA-MRI showed a significantly higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC than ECA-MRI (77.0% vs. 64.3%, <i>P</i>=0.006) without a significant difference in specificity (94.7% vs. 95.7%, <i>P</i>=0.801). On ECAMRI, \"definite\" or \"probable\" HCC categories of the 2022 KLCA-NCC had significantly higher sensitivity than those of the 2018 KLCA-NCC (85.3% vs. 78.3%, <i>P</i>=0.002) with identical specificity (93.6%). On HBA-MRI, the sensitivity and specificity of \"definite\" or \"probable\" HCC categories of both 2018 and 2022 KLCA-NCC were not significantly different (83.3% vs. 83.6%, <i>P</i>>0.999 and 92.1% vs. 90.8%, <i>P</i>>0.999, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In \"definite\" HCC category of both 2018 and 2022 KLCA-NCC, HBA-MRI provides better sensitivity than ECA-MRI without compromising specificity. On ECA-MRI, \"definite\" or \"probable\" HCC categories of the 2022 KLCA-NCC may improve sensitivity in the diagnosis of HCC compared with the 2018 KLCA-NCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16226,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Cancer","volume":"23 1","pages":"157-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/aa/jlc-2023-02-07.PMC10202238.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2023.02.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of 2022 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) imaging criteria compared with the 2018 KLCA-NCC for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: This retrospective study included 415 treatment-naïve patients (152 patients who underwent extracellular contrast agent [ECA]-MRI and 263 who underwent hepatobiliary agent [HBA]-MRI; 535 lesions, including 412 HCCs) with a high risk of HCC who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI. Two readers evaluated all lesions according to the 2018 and 2022 KLCA-NCC imaging diagnostic criteria, and the per-lesion diagnostic performances were compared.

Results: In "definite" HCC category of both 2018 and 2022 KLCA-NCC, HBA-MRI showed a significantly higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC than ECA-MRI (77.0% vs. 64.3%, P=0.006) without a significant difference in specificity (94.7% vs. 95.7%, P=0.801). On ECAMRI, "definite" or "probable" HCC categories of the 2022 KLCA-NCC had significantly higher sensitivity than those of the 2018 KLCA-NCC (85.3% vs. 78.3%, P=0.002) with identical specificity (93.6%). On HBA-MRI, the sensitivity and specificity of "definite" or "probable" HCC categories of both 2018 and 2022 KLCA-NCC were not significantly different (83.3% vs. 83.6%, P>0.999 and 92.1% vs. 90.8%, P>0.999, respectively).

Conclusions: In "definite" HCC category of both 2018 and 2022 KLCA-NCC, HBA-MRI provides better sensitivity than ECA-MRI without compromising specificity. On ECA-MRI, "definite" or "probable" HCC categories of the 2022 KLCA-NCC may improve sensitivity in the diagnosis of HCC compared with the 2018 KLCA-NCC.

Abstract Image

2022年KLCA-NCC标准在使用细胞外造影剂和肝胆剂的磁共振成像中对肝细胞癌的诊断性能:与2018年KLCA-NCC标准的比较。
背景/目的:本研究旨在确定 2022 年韩国肝癌协会-国家癌症中心(KLCA-NCC)成像标准与 2018 年韩国肝癌协会-国家癌症中心使用磁共振成像(MRI)对高危患者肝细胞癌(HCC)的诊断性能比较:这项回顾性研究纳入了415名接受造影剂增强MRI检查的HCC高危患者(152名患者接受细胞外造影剂[ECA]-MRI检查,263名患者接受肝胆剂[HBA]-MRI检查;535个病灶,包括412个HCC)。两名阅读者根据2018年和2022年KLCA-NCC影像诊断标准对所有病灶进行评估,并比较每个病灶的诊断结果:在2018年和2022年KLCA-NCC的 "明确 "HCC类别中,HBA-MRI诊断HCC的敏感性显著高于ECA-MRI(77.0% vs. 64.3%,P=0.006),特异性无显著差异(94.7% vs. 95.7%,P=0.801)。在ECAMRI上,2022年KLCA-NCC的 "确定 "或 "可能 "HCC类别的灵敏度明显高于2018年KLCA-NCC的类别(85.3% vs. 78.3%,P=0.002),特异性相同(93.6%)。在HBA-MRI上,2018年和2022年KLCA-NCC的 "确定 "或 "可能 "HCC类别的敏感性和特异性无显著差异(分别为83.3% vs. 83.6%,P>0.999和92.1% vs. 90.8%,P>0.999):在2018年和2022年KLCA-NCC的 "明确 "HCC类别中,HBA-MRI比ECA-MRI提供更好的灵敏度,而不影响特异性。在 ECA-MRI 上,与 2018 KLCA-NCC 相比,2022 KLCA-NCC 的 "确定 "或 "可能 "HCC 类别可提高诊断 HCC 的灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信