Epoprostenol Exposure During Pregnancy.

Emily E Naoum, Carolyn LaVita, Natasha Lopez, Alexa Nardone, Marti D Soffer, Kenneth T Shelton
{"title":"Epoprostenol Exposure During Pregnancy.","authors":"Emily E Naoum,&nbsp;Carolyn LaVita,&nbsp;Natasha Lopez,&nbsp;Alexa Nardone,&nbsp;Marti D Soffer,&nbsp;Kenneth T Shelton","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Institutional policies restricting pregnant providers from caring for patients receiving inhaled epoprostenol exist across the nation based on little to no data to substantiate this practice. Over the last 2 decades, the use of inhaled pulmonary vasodilators has expanded in patients with cardiac and respiratory disease providing more evidence for the safety of these medications in obstetrical patients. We propose a thoughtful consideration and review of the literature to remove this restriction to reduce the need to reveal early pregnancy status to employers, to alleviate undue stress for pregnant caregivers who are exposed to patients receiving epoprostenol, and to ensure safe, equal employment, and learning opportunities for pregnant providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 6","pages":"e0928"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/33/af/cc9-5-e0928.PMC10456979.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Institutional policies restricting pregnant providers from caring for patients receiving inhaled epoprostenol exist across the nation based on little to no data to substantiate this practice. Over the last 2 decades, the use of inhaled pulmonary vasodilators has expanded in patients with cardiac and respiratory disease providing more evidence for the safety of these medications in obstetrical patients. We propose a thoughtful consideration and review of the literature to remove this restriction to reduce the need to reveal early pregnancy status to employers, to alleviate undue stress for pregnant caregivers who are exposed to patients receiving epoprostenol, and to ensure safe, equal employment, and learning opportunities for pregnant providers.

Abstract Image

妊娠期丙烯醇暴露。
全国各地都存在限制孕妇提供者照顾吸入epoprostenol患者的制度性政策,但几乎没有数据证实这一做法。在过去的20年里,吸入式肺血管扩张剂在心脏和呼吸系统疾病患者中的应用已经扩大,这为这些药物在产科患者中的安全性提供了更多的证据。我们建议仔细考虑并回顾文献,以消除这一限制,减少向雇主披露早期妊娠状况的需要,减轻孕妇护理人员接触到接受epoprostenol的患者的不必要压力,并确保孕妇提供者的安全、平等就业和学习机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信