The future of pyrogenicity testing: Phasing out the rabbit pyrogen test. A meeting report

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Gwenaël Cirefice , Katrin Schütte , Ingo Spreitzer , Emmanuelle Charton , Shahjahan Shaid , Laura Viviani , Michelle Rubbrecht , Irene Manou
{"title":"The future of pyrogenicity testing: Phasing out the rabbit pyrogen test. A meeting report","authors":"Gwenaël Cirefice ,&nbsp;Katrin Schütte ,&nbsp;Ingo Spreitzer ,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Charton ,&nbsp;Shahjahan Shaid ,&nbsp;Laura Viviani ,&nbsp;Michelle Rubbrecht ,&nbsp;Irene Manou","doi":"10.1016/j.biologicals.2023.101702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rabbit pyrogen test (RPT) was the benchmark for pyrogenicity testing, but scientific advancements have provided innovative and humane methods, such as the <em>in vitro</em> monocyte-activation test (MAT). However, transitioning from the RPT to the MAT has been challenging. The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines &amp; HealthCare, the Council of Europe, and the European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing jointly hosted an international conference entitled \"The future of pyrogenicity testing: phasing out the rabbit pyrogen test\". The conference aimed to show how the European Pharmacopoeia intends to remove the RPT from its texts by 2026, facilitate the use of MAT, and identify gaps in the suppression of RPT. The events contributed to a better understanding of the barriers to RPT replacement and acceptance of <em>in vitro</em> alternatives. Participants comprised stakeholders from Asia, Europe, and North America, including vaccine developers, contract laboratories, and regulators. Participants shared their replacement strategies and experiences with MAT implementation. They emphasised the need for continued cooperation between stakeholders and stressed the importance of international harmonisation of regulatory requirements to help accelerate MAT acceptance outside Europe. Despite the challenges, the willingness to eliminate the unnecessary use of RPT was common across all participants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045105623000404","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rabbit pyrogen test (RPT) was the benchmark for pyrogenicity testing, but scientific advancements have provided innovative and humane methods, such as the in vitro monocyte-activation test (MAT). However, transitioning from the RPT to the MAT has been challenging. The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare, the Council of Europe, and the European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing jointly hosted an international conference entitled "The future of pyrogenicity testing: phasing out the rabbit pyrogen test". The conference aimed to show how the European Pharmacopoeia intends to remove the RPT from its texts by 2026, facilitate the use of MAT, and identify gaps in the suppression of RPT. The events contributed to a better understanding of the barriers to RPT replacement and acceptance of in vitro alternatives. Participants comprised stakeholders from Asia, Europe, and North America, including vaccine developers, contract laboratories, and regulators. Participants shared their replacement strategies and experiences with MAT implementation. They emphasised the need for continued cooperation between stakeholders and stressed the importance of international harmonisation of regulatory requirements to help accelerate MAT acceptance outside Europe. Despite the challenges, the willingness to eliminate the unnecessary use of RPT was common across all participants.

热原试验的未来:逐步淘汰兔热原试验。会议报告
家兔热原试验(RPT)是热原性试验的基准,但科学进步提供了创新和人性化的方法,如体外单核细胞活化试验(MAT)。然而,从RPT过渡到MAT一直具有挑战性。欧洲药品质量管理局;HealthCare、欧洲委员会和欧洲动物试验替代方法伙伴关系联合主办了一次题为“热原试验的未来:逐步淘汰兔子热原试验”的国际会议。该会议旨在展示《欧洲药典》打算如何在2026年前将RPT从其文本中删除,促进MAT的使用,并确定在抑制RPT方面的差距。这些事件有助于更好地了解RPT替代和接受体外替代品的障碍。参与者包括来自亚洲、欧洲和北美的利益相关者,包括疫苗开发商、合同实验室和监管机构。参与者分享了他们在MAT实施方面的替代策略和经验。他们强调了利益相关者之间持续合作的必要性,并强调了监管要求的国际协调的重要性,以帮助加快MAT在欧洲以外的接受。尽管存在挑战,但所有参与者都愿意消除不必要的RPT使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信