Assessing Trustworthiness of Internet Pharmacies with an Internet Browser Extension.

Vraj Patel, Mason Lovett, Ryan Rybarczyk, John Hertig
{"title":"Assessing Trustworthiness of Internet Pharmacies with an Internet Browser Extension.","authors":"Vraj Patel,&nbsp;Mason Lovett,&nbsp;Ryan Rybarczyk,&nbsp;John Hertig","doi":"10.1177/27550834231191895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many people are turning to online pharmacies for medication purchases leading to a growing number of legal and illegal online pharmacies (IOPs). With a growing number of IOPs, consumers are more likely to receive substandard or falsified medications when purchasing medications online.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to identify the number of <i>verified</i>, <i>not recommended</i>, and <i>not verified</i> pharmacy websites consumers see using different keywords and medications on an Internet browser based off the National Association Boards of Pharmacy's (NABP) list of <i>verified</i> and <i>not recommended</i> websites. It also aims to compare which keywords result in more <i>not recommended</i> pharmacy websites compared with <i>verified</i> pharmacy websites for consumers over time.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We created an Internet browser extension compatible with different Internet browsers to quickly identify which search results are <i>verified</i>, <i>not recommended</i>, and <i>not verified</i> based on NABP lists. We then utilized an application programming interface to automatically search different key terms and classify the search results as <i>verified</i>, <i>not recommended</i>, and <i>not verified</i> over a 4-week data collection period for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 131 key terms were used for the search. There was an average signal determining the number of <i>verified</i> and <i>not recommended</i> search results compared with <i>not verified</i> results of 4.3% over the 4-week data collection period. There was about a 3:1 ratio of <i>not recommended</i> to <i>verified</i> search results noted. Top signal and <i>not recommended</i> search result producing keywords contained words such as \"shipped\" and \"cheap.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Internet browser extension will aid in making it easier to identify which search results are safe and which are not safe when searching to purchase medications online. This study has set the premise on expanding how to use an Internet pharmacy extension to combat IOPs, improve patient safety, and increase safe access to medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":75087,"journal":{"name":"The journal of medicine access","volume":"7 ","pages":"27550834231191895"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/ac/10.1177_27550834231191895.PMC10449388.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of medicine access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27550834231191895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many people are turning to online pharmacies for medication purchases leading to a growing number of legal and illegal online pharmacies (IOPs). With a growing number of IOPs, consumers are more likely to receive substandard or falsified medications when purchasing medications online.

Objectives: This study aims to identify the number of verified, not recommended, and not verified pharmacy websites consumers see using different keywords and medications on an Internet browser based off the National Association Boards of Pharmacy's (NABP) list of verified and not recommended websites. It also aims to compare which keywords result in more not recommended pharmacy websites compared with verified pharmacy websites for consumers over time.

Design and methods: We created an Internet browser extension compatible with different Internet browsers to quickly identify which search results are verified, not recommended, and not verified based on NABP lists. We then utilized an application programming interface to automatically search different key terms and classify the search results as verified, not recommended, and not verified over a 4-week data collection period for analysis.

Results: A total of 131 key terms were used for the search. There was an average signal determining the number of verified and not recommended search results compared with not verified results of 4.3% over the 4-week data collection period. There was about a 3:1 ratio of not recommended to verified search results noted. Top signal and not recommended search result producing keywords contained words such as "shipped" and "cheap."

Conclusion: The Internet browser extension will aid in making it easier to identify which search results are safe and which are not safe when searching to purchase medications online. This study has set the premise on expanding how to use an Internet pharmacy extension to combat IOPs, improve patient safety, and increase safe access to medications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用互联网浏览器扩展评估互联网药店的可信度。
背景:许多人转向网上药店购买药品,导致合法和非法的网上药店(IOPs)越来越多。随着IOPs的增加,消费者在网上购买药品时更有可能收到不合格或伪造的药品。目的:本研究旨在根据美国国家药房协会委员会(NABP)的已验证和不推荐网站列表,确定消费者在互联网浏览器上使用不同关键词和药物看到的已验证、不推荐和未验证的药店网站的数量。它还旨在比较随着时间的推移,哪些关键词会导致更多不推荐的药店网站与经过验证的药店网站相比。设计和方法:我们创建了一个与不同的Internet浏览器兼容的Internet浏览器扩展,以根据NABP列表快速识别哪些搜索结果是经过验证的,哪些是不推荐的,哪些是未经过验证的。然后,我们利用应用程序编程接口自动搜索不同的关键字,并在4周的数据收集周期内将搜索结果分类为已验证、不推荐和未验证,以便进行分析。结果:共使用131个关键词进行检索。在4周的数据收集期间,与未验证的结果相比,确定验证和不推荐的搜索结果数量的平均信号为4.3%。不推荐搜索结果与经过验证的搜索结果的比例约为3:1。顶级信号和不推荐的搜索结果产生的关键字包含“发货”和“便宜”等词。“结论:当在线搜索购买药品时,互联网浏览器扩展将有助于更容易地识别哪些搜索结果是安全的,哪些是不安全的。本研究为扩展如何使用互联网药房扩展来对抗IOPs,提高患者安全性并增加安全获得药物奠定了前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信