Does YouTube provide adequate information about orthodontic pain?

IF 3 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Angle Orthodontist Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.2319/072822-527.1

Ieva Tamošiūnaitė, Arūnas Vasiliauskas, Furkan Dindaroğlu

{"title":"Does YouTube provide adequate information about orthodontic pain?","authors":"Ieva Tamošiūnaitė, Arūnas Vasiliauskas, Furkan Dindaroğlu","doi":"10.2319/072822-527.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the content and quality of information about orthodontic pain on YouTube.Materials and methods: YouTube was searched using the keywords \"orthodontic pain\" and \"brace pain.\" A total of 65 videos were chosen for the final analysis. Videos were classified into high- and low-content groups using an eight-point scoring system and reviewed according to selected orthodontic pain-related topics. Video quality was rated by the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI) and Global Quality Scale (GQS). Statistical data analysis was performed using SPSS 28.0 software, Mann-Whitney U-tests, χ2 tests, and Spearman correlation coefficients.Results: Most YouTube videos related to orthodontic pain were low content (86.2%), and a few were high content (13.8%). Pharmacological pain relief was the most prevalent topic (50.8%), followed by duration of pain (32.3%) and influence of pain on patient quality of life (29.2%). The least-mentioned topic was possible location of pain (7.7%). Most of the videos were uploaded by laypeople (64.6%). Videos uploaded by dental professionals had significantly higher means of GQS scores (P = .035), flow of information (P < .001), information quality (P = .008), and total VIQI (P < .001). Compared with low-content, high-content videos had a higher mean of flow of information (P = .037). There was a weak correlation between total content and GQS scores and a strong correlation between GQS and VIQI scores (r = 0.740; P < .01).Conclusions: Overall, YouTube was found to be an inadequate source of information on orthodontic pain.","PeriodicalId":50790,"journal":{"name":"Angle Orthodontist","volume":"93 4","pages":"403-408"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294584/pdf/i1945-7103-93-4-403.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angle Orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/072822-527.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the content and quality of information about orthodontic pain on YouTube.

Materials and methods: YouTube was searched using the keywords "orthodontic pain" and "brace pain." A total of 65 videos were chosen for the final analysis. Videos were classified into high- and low-content groups using an eight-point scoring system and reviewed according to selected orthodontic pain-related topics. Video quality was rated by the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI) and Global Quality Scale (GQS). Statistical data analysis was performed using SPSS 28.0 software, Mann-Whitney U-tests, χ2 tests, and Spearman correlation coefficients.

Results: Most YouTube videos related to orthodontic pain were low content (86.2%), and a few were high content (13.8%). Pharmacological pain relief was the most prevalent topic (50.8%), followed by duration of pain (32.3%) and influence of pain on patient quality of life (29.2%). The least-mentioned topic was possible location of pain (7.7%). Most of the videos were uploaded by laypeople (64.6%). Videos uploaded by dental professionals had significantly higher means of GQS scores (P = .035), flow of information (P < .001), information quality (P = .008), and total VIQI (P < .001). Compared with low-content, high-content videos had a higher mean of flow of information (P = .037). There was a weak correlation between total content and GQS scores and a strong correlation between GQS and VIQI scores (r = 0.740; P < .01).

Conclusions: Overall, YouTube was found to be an inadequate source of information on orthodontic pain.

查看原文本刊更多论文

YouTube是否提供了足够的关于正畸疼痛的信息?

目的:评价YouTube上正畸疼痛相关信息的内容和质量。材料和方法:在YouTube上搜索关键词“正畸疼痛”和“支具疼痛”。共有65个视频被选中进行最终分析。使用8分评分系统将视频分为高内容组和低内容组，并根据选择的正畸疼痛相关主题进行审查。视频质量由视频信息和质量指数(VIQI)和全球质量量表(GQS)评定。统计资料采用SPSS 28.0软件、Mann-Whitney u检验、χ2检验和Spearman相关系数进行分析。结果:YouTube上与正畸疼痛相关的视频内容以低内容为主(86.2%)，高内容占少数(13.8%)。药物缓解疼痛是最普遍的话题(50.8%)，其次是疼痛持续时间(32.3%)和疼痛对患者生活质量的影响(29.2%)。最少被提及的话题是疼痛的可能部位(7.7%)。大部分视频是由外行人上传的(64.6%)。牙科专业人员上传的视频在GQS得分(P = 0.035)、信息流(P < 0.001)、信息质量(P = 0.008)和总VIQI (P < 0.001)方面均有显著提高。与低内容视频相比，高内容视频的平均信息流更高(P = 0.037)。总含量与GQS评分呈弱相关，与VIQI评分呈强相关(r = 0.740;P < 0.01)。结论:总的来说，YouTube是一个不充分的正畸疼痛信息来源。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Angle Orthodontist 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

5.90%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： The Angle Orthodontist is the official publication of the Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists and is published bimonthly in January, March, May, July, September and November by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation Inc. The Angle Orthodontist is the only major journal in orthodontics with a non-commercial, non-profit publisher -- The E. H. Angle Education and Research Foundation. We value our freedom to operate exclusively in the best interests of our readers and authors. Our website www.angle.org is completely free and open to all visitors.