Program Barriers and Facilitators in Virtual Cancer Exercise Implementation: A Qualitative Analysis.

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Jessica S Gorzelitz, Nour Bouji, Nicole L Stout
{"title":"Program Barriers and Facilitators in Virtual Cancer Exercise Implementation: A Qualitative Analysis.","authors":"Jessica S Gorzelitz,&nbsp;Nour Bouji,&nbsp;Nicole L Stout","doi":"10.1249/tjx.0000000000000199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/purpose: </strong>Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many in-person cancer exercise and rehabilitation programs necessarily transitioned to virtual formats to meet the needs of individuals living with and beyond cancer. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively assess program-level facilitators and barriers to virtual exercise program implementation and to identify preferred strategies to overcome implementation barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>US-based virtual cancer exercise and rehabilitation programs were recruited from professional networks via an emailed screening questionnaire. Eligible programs identified a point of contact for a 1:1 semi-structured interview to discuss program-level barriers and facilitators to implementing virtual exercise programs. Interview transcript analysis was conducted via inductive coding techniques using NVivo software. Barriers were categorized according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and a prioritized list of strategies to support implementation was created by mapping barriers to a list of Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 41 unique responses received, 24 program representatives completed semi-structured interviews. Interviewees represented individual programs, community-based programs, and hospital-based cancer exercise/rehabilitation programs. Analysis showed high correlation between facilitators and barriers by program type, with both program- and individual-level strategies used to implement exercise programs virtually. Strategies that ranked highest to support implementation include promoting program adaptability, building a coalition of stakeholders and identifying program champions, developing an implementation blueprint, altering organizational incentives and allowances, providing education across stakeholder groups, and accessing funding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Learning from the transition of cancer exercise and rehabilitation programs to virtual formats due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we identify program-level barriers and facilitators encountered in the implementation of virtual programs and highlight implementation strategies that are most relevant to overcome common barriers. We present a roadmap for programs to use these strategies for future work in virtual exercise and rehabilitation program implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75243,"journal":{"name":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119660/pdf/nihms-1787100.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction/purpose: Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many in-person cancer exercise and rehabilitation programs necessarily transitioned to virtual formats to meet the needs of individuals living with and beyond cancer. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively assess program-level facilitators and barriers to virtual exercise program implementation and to identify preferred strategies to overcome implementation barriers.

Methods: US-based virtual cancer exercise and rehabilitation programs were recruited from professional networks via an emailed screening questionnaire. Eligible programs identified a point of contact for a 1:1 semi-structured interview to discuss program-level barriers and facilitators to implementing virtual exercise programs. Interview transcript analysis was conducted via inductive coding techniques using NVivo software. Barriers were categorized according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and a prioritized list of strategies to support implementation was created by mapping barriers to a list of Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change.

Results: Of the 41 unique responses received, 24 program representatives completed semi-structured interviews. Interviewees represented individual programs, community-based programs, and hospital-based cancer exercise/rehabilitation programs. Analysis showed high correlation between facilitators and barriers by program type, with both program- and individual-level strategies used to implement exercise programs virtually. Strategies that ranked highest to support implementation include promoting program adaptability, building a coalition of stakeholders and identifying program champions, developing an implementation blueprint, altering organizational incentives and allowances, providing education across stakeholder groups, and accessing funding.

Conclusions: Learning from the transition of cancer exercise and rehabilitation programs to virtual formats due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we identify program-level barriers and facilitators encountered in the implementation of virtual programs and highlight implementation strategies that are most relevant to overcome common barriers. We present a roadmap for programs to use these strategies for future work in virtual exercise and rehabilitation program implementation.

Abstract Image

虚拟癌症练习实施中的程序障碍和促进因素:定性分析。
导语/目的:由于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的大流行,许多面对面的癌症锻炼和康复计划必须过渡到虚拟形式,以满足癌症患者和非癌症患者的需求。本研究的目的是定性地评估项目层面的促进因素和虚拟锻炼项目实施的障碍,并确定克服实施障碍的首选策略。方法:通过电子邮件筛选问卷从专业网络中招募美国虚拟癌症运动和康复项目。符合条件的项目确定了一个联络点,进行1:1的半结构化访谈,讨论项目层面的障碍和实施虚拟锻炼项目的促进因素。访谈记录分析采用NVivo软件通过归纳编码技术进行。根据实施研究综合框架对障碍进行分类,并通过将障碍映射到实施变革的专家建议列表,创建了支持实施的优先战略列表。结果:在收到的41份独特回复中,24名项目代表完成了半结构化访谈。受访者代表了个人方案、社区方案和基于医院的癌症运动/康复方案。分析显示,项目类型的促进因素和障碍之间存在高度相关性,项目和个人层面的策略都用于虚拟地实施锻炼项目。在支持实施方面排名最高的战略包括促进项目适应性、建立利益相关者联盟并确定项目倡导者、制定实施蓝图、改变组织激励和津贴、在利益相关者群体之间提供教育以及获得资金。结论:从2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致癌症运动和康复项目向虚拟形式的转变中吸取教训,我们确定了在实施虚拟项目时遇到的项目层面的障碍和促进因素,并强调了与克服常见障碍最相关的实施策略。我们提出了一个路线图的程序,使用这些策略在虚拟运动和康复计划实施的未来工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信