Arto J. Hautala PhD , Babooshka Shavazipour PhD , Bekir Afsar PhD , Mikko P. Tulppo PhD , Kaisa Miettinen PhD
{"title":"Machine learning models in predicting health care costs in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome: A prospective pilot study","authors":"Arto J. Hautala PhD , Babooshka Shavazipour PhD , Bekir Afsar PhD , Mikko P. Tulppo PhD , Kaisa Miettinen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health care budgets are limited, requiring the optimal use of resources. Machine learning (ML) methods may have an enormous potential for effective use of health care resources.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We assessed the applicability of selected ML tools to evaluate the contribution of known risk markers for prognosis of coronary artery disease to predict health care costs for all reasons in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome (n = 65, aged 65 ± 9 years) for 1-year follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Risk markers were assessed at baseline, and health care costs were collected from electronic health registries. The Cross-decomposition algorithms were used to rank the considered risk markers based on their impacts on variances. Then regression analysis was performed to predict costs by entering the first top-ranking risk marker and adding the next-best markers, one by one, to build up altogether 13 predictive models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average annual health care costs were €2601 ± €5378 per patient. The Depression Scale showed the highest predictive value (r = 0.395), accounting for 16% of the costs (<em>P</em> = .001). When the next 2 ranked markers (LDL cholesterol, r = 0.230; and left ventricular ejection fraction, r = -0.227, respectively) were added to the model, the predictive value was 24% for the costs (<em>P</em> = .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Higher depression score is the primary variable forecasting health care costs in 1-year follow-up among acute coronary syndrome patients. The ML tools may help decision-making when planning optimal utilization of treatment strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 137-142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Health care budgets are limited, requiring the optimal use of resources. Machine learning (ML) methods may have an enormous potential for effective use of health care resources.
Objective
We assessed the applicability of selected ML tools to evaluate the contribution of known risk markers for prognosis of coronary artery disease to predict health care costs for all reasons in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome (n = 65, aged 65 ± 9 years) for 1-year follow-up.
Methods
Risk markers were assessed at baseline, and health care costs were collected from electronic health registries. The Cross-decomposition algorithms were used to rank the considered risk markers based on their impacts on variances. Then regression analysis was performed to predict costs by entering the first top-ranking risk marker and adding the next-best markers, one by one, to build up altogether 13 predictive models.
Results
The average annual health care costs were €2601 ± €5378 per patient. The Depression Scale showed the highest predictive value (r = 0.395), accounting for 16% of the costs (P = .001). When the next 2 ranked markers (LDL cholesterol, r = 0.230; and left ventricular ejection fraction, r = -0.227, respectively) were added to the model, the predictive value was 24% for the costs (P = .001).
Conclusion
Higher depression score is the primary variable forecasting health care costs in 1-year follow-up among acute coronary syndrome patients. The ML tools may help decision-making when planning optimal utilization of treatment strategies.