Improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score after prostatic urethral lifts is dependent on prostatic volume.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Canadian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2023-08-01
Sagar R Patel, Katherine A Lowrey, Angeline Johny, Christopher P Smith
{"title":"Improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score after prostatic urethral lifts is dependent on prostatic volume.","authors":"Sagar R Patel,&nbsp;Katherine A Lowrey,&nbsp;Angeline Johny,&nbsp;Christopher P Smith","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prostatic urethral lifts (PUL) provide improvement in urinary symptoms for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The aim of this study is to determine operative factors associated with improvement in urinary symptoms after PUL in men with bothersome BPH.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Men with BPH undergoing PUL at a single, tertiary center were identified from 2019 to 2022. Inclusion criteria included documented prostate volume as well as preoperative and postoperative cystoscopic images of the prostatic urethra. Multivariate regression modeling was performed to determine the predictive factors-including prostate volume, number of implants, and degree of unobstructed prostatic urethral channel-for improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after PUL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 47 men, the distribution of prostate volume was 1 patient with < 30 grams, 33 patients with 30-79 grams, five patients with 80-100 grams, and six patients with > 100 grams. The mean number of implants used was six implants. The mean preoperative and postoperative IPSS were 23 and 14, respectively. The mean (standard error (SE)) change and percent change in IPSS score following PUL was 14 and 60%, respectively. The mean percent improvement in prostatic urethral channel after anterior clip placements was 67%. On multivariate analysis, larger prostate volume was associated with greater change in IPPS follow surgery (p = 0.0091) while number of implants and percent of prostatic urethral opening were not associated with change in IPSS (p = 0.3094 and p = 0.2249, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Men with larger prostates are associated with greater improvement in urinary symptom after PUL regardless of number of implants utilized and degree of prostatic urethral channel opening after prostatic implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":56323,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Urology","volume":"30 4","pages":"11619-11623"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prostatic urethral lifts (PUL) provide improvement in urinary symptoms for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The aim of this study is to determine operative factors associated with improvement in urinary symptoms after PUL in men with bothersome BPH.

Materials and methods: Men with BPH undergoing PUL at a single, tertiary center were identified from 2019 to 2022. Inclusion criteria included documented prostate volume as well as preoperative and postoperative cystoscopic images of the prostatic urethra. Multivariate regression modeling was performed to determine the predictive factors-including prostate volume, number of implants, and degree of unobstructed prostatic urethral channel-for improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after PUL.

Results: Of the 47 men, the distribution of prostate volume was 1 patient with < 30 grams, 33 patients with 30-79 grams, five patients with 80-100 grams, and six patients with > 100 grams. The mean number of implants used was six implants. The mean preoperative and postoperative IPSS were 23 and 14, respectively. The mean (standard error (SE)) change and percent change in IPSS score following PUL was 14 and 60%, respectively. The mean percent improvement in prostatic urethral channel after anterior clip placements was 67%. On multivariate analysis, larger prostate volume was associated with greater change in IPPS follow surgery (p = 0.0091) while number of implants and percent of prostatic urethral opening were not associated with change in IPSS (p = 0.3094 and p = 0.2249, respectively).

Conclusion: Men with larger prostates are associated with greater improvement in urinary symptom after PUL regardless of number of implants utilized and degree of prostatic urethral channel opening after prostatic implants.

前列腺尿道提升术后国际前列腺症状评分的改善与前列腺体积有关。
前列腺尿道提升术(PUL)可改善男性良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者的泌尿系统症状。本研究的目的是确定与泌尿系统症状改善有关的手术因素在前列腺增生男性PUL后。材料和方法:从2019年到2022年,在单一三级中心确定了BPH患者接受PUL。纳入标准包括记录的前列腺体积以及前列腺尿道术前和术后膀胱镜图像。采用多元回归模型来确定PUL后国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)改善的预测因素,包括前列腺体积、植入物数量和前列腺尿道通道通畅程度。结果:47例男性前列腺体积分布< 30 g 1例,30 ~ 79 g 33例,80 ~ 100 g 5例,> 100 g 6例。平均使用6个种植体。术前和术后平均IPSS分别为23和14。PUL后IPSS评分的平均(标准误差(SE))变化和百分比变化分别为14%和60%。前路夹放置后前列腺尿道通道平均改善率为67%。在多因素分析中,前列腺体积越大,术后IPSS变化越大(p = 0.0091),而植入物数量和前列腺尿道开口百分比与IPSS变化无关(p = 0.3094和p = 0.2249)。结论:前列腺较大的男性在前列腺植入后泌尿症状的改善更大,与植入数量和前列腺尿道通道开放程度无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Urology
Canadian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The CJU publishes articles of interest to the field of urology and related specialties who treat urologic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信