A Short-Form Measure of Diabetes Distress Among Adults With Type 1 Diabetes for Use in Clinical Practice: Development and Validation of the T1-DDS-7.

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes Care Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.2337/dc23-0460
Mette Nygaard, Ingrid Willaing, Lene Eide Joensen, Pil Lindgreen, Vibeke Stenov, Danielle Hessler, Kirsten Nørgaard, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, Kasper Olesen
{"title":"A Short-Form Measure of Diabetes Distress Among Adults With Type 1 Diabetes for Use in Clinical Practice: Development and Validation of the T1-DDS-7.","authors":"Mette Nygaard,&nbsp;Ingrid Willaing,&nbsp;Lene Eide Joensen,&nbsp;Pil Lindgreen,&nbsp;Vibeke Stenov,&nbsp;Danielle Hessler,&nbsp;Kirsten Nørgaard,&nbsp;Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard,&nbsp;Kasper Olesen","doi":"10.2337/dc23-0460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Valid and reliable diabetes distress assessment is essential for identifying adults with elevated levels of concern and to guide targeted support. However, assessing diabetes distress must also be feasible in time-limited settings. We aimed to identify a short-form measure of the 28-item Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale (T1-DDS-28) representing seven sources of type 1 diabetes distress that would be convenient for use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Based on the evaluation of influence and importance by 14 experts in diabetes care and research, we identified the best-performing item within each of seven sources of diabetes distress included in the T1-DDS-28. To further validate the proposed short-form measure, we used survey data from 2,016 adults living with type 1 diabetes. Validity was examined by exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's α, test-retest reliability analysis, and correlations with other psychosocial measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a short-form measure of the T1-DDS-28 consisting of seven items, each representing a source of diabetes distress. These items showed satisfactory reliability (factor loadings > 0.45; α = 0.82; test-retest correlation, r = 0.90) and validity (correlation with T1-DDS-28, r = 0.95; area under the curve = 0.91; sensitivity 93%; specificity 89%) when combined in the short-form scale (T1-DDS-7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We propose the T1-DDS-7 as a valid and reliable measure for routine screening of diabetes distress among adults with type 1 diabetes. In case of elevated levels of diabetes distress, we recommend that a full-scale assessment and open dialogue follow the short-form measure before determining further treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-0460","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Valid and reliable diabetes distress assessment is essential for identifying adults with elevated levels of concern and to guide targeted support. However, assessing diabetes distress must also be feasible in time-limited settings. We aimed to identify a short-form measure of the 28-item Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale (T1-DDS-28) representing seven sources of type 1 diabetes distress that would be convenient for use in clinical practice.

Research design and methods: Based on the evaluation of influence and importance by 14 experts in diabetes care and research, we identified the best-performing item within each of seven sources of diabetes distress included in the T1-DDS-28. To further validate the proposed short-form measure, we used survey data from 2,016 adults living with type 1 diabetes. Validity was examined by exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's α, test-retest reliability analysis, and correlations with other psychosocial measures.

Results: We identified a short-form measure of the T1-DDS-28 consisting of seven items, each representing a source of diabetes distress. These items showed satisfactory reliability (factor loadings > 0.45; α = 0.82; test-retest correlation, r = 0.90) and validity (correlation with T1-DDS-28, r = 0.95; area under the curve = 0.91; sensitivity 93%; specificity 89%) when combined in the short-form scale (T1-DDS-7).

Conclusions: We propose the T1-DDS-7 as a valid and reliable measure for routine screening of diabetes distress among adults with type 1 diabetes. In case of elevated levels of diabetes distress, we recommend that a full-scale assessment and open dialogue follow the short-form measure before determining further treatment.

用于临床实践的成人1型糖尿病患者糖尿病痛苦的简短测量:T1-DDS-7的开发和验证
目的:有效和可靠的糖尿病痛苦评估对于识别高水平关注的成年人和指导有针对性的支持是必不可少的。然而,评估糖尿病痛苦也必须是可行的,在有限的时间设置。我们的目的是确定一种简短的1型糖尿病困扰量表(T1-DDS-28),该量表包含28个条目,代表了7种1型糖尿病困扰的来源,便于在临床实践中使用。研究设计和方法:基于14位糖尿病护理和研究专家对影响和重要性的评估,我们确定了T1-DDS-28中七个糖尿病困扰来源中每个来源中表现最好的项目。为了进一步验证所提出的简短测量方法,我们使用了2016名1型糖尿病成年人的调查数据。通过探索性因素分析、Cronbach’s α、重测信度分析以及与其他社会心理测量的相关性来检验效度。结果:我们确定了T1-DDS-28的简短测量,由七个项目组成,每个项目代表一个糖尿病困扰的来源。这些项目具有令人满意的信度(因子负荷> 0.45;α = 0.82;重测相关,r = 0.90)和效度(与T1-DDS-28相关,r = 0.95;曲线下面积= 0.91;灵敏度93%;特异性89%),当以短形式量表(T1-DDS-7)合并时。结论:我们建议T1-DDS-7作为1型糖尿病成人患者糖尿病窘迫的常规筛查有效可靠的指标。如果糖尿病困扰水平升高,我们建议在确定进一步治疗之前,在短期措施之后进行全面评估和公开对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Care
Diabetes Care 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
27.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
449
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes. Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信