Quantitative analysis of zirconia and titanium implant artefacts in three-dimensional virtual models of multi-slice CT and cone beam CT: does scan protocol matter?

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dento maxillo facial radiology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20230275
Ragai Edward Matta, Stephanie Knapp Giacaman, Marco Wiesmueller, Rainer Lutz, Michael Uder, Manfred Wichmann, Anna Seidel
{"title":"Quantitative analysis of zirconia and titanium implant artefacts in three-dimensional virtual models of multi-slice CT and cone beam CT: does scan protocol matter?","authors":"Ragai Edward Matta, Stephanie Knapp Giacaman, Marco Wiesmueller, Rainer Lutz, Michael Uder, Manfred Wichmann, Anna Seidel","doi":"10.1259/dmfr.20230275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Artefacts from dental implants in three-dimensional (3D) imaging may lead to incorrect representation of anatomical dimensions and impede virtual planning in navigated implantology. The aim of this study was quantitative assessment of artefacts in 3D STL models from cone beam CT (CBCT) and multislice CT (MSCT) using different scanning protocols and titanium-zirconium (Ti-Zr) and zirconium (ZrO<sub>2</sub>) implant materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three ZrO<sub>2</sub> and three Ti-Zr implants were respectively placed in the mandibles of two fresh human specimens. Before (baseline) and after implant placement, 3D digital imaging scans were performed (10 repetitions per timepoint: voxel size 0.2 mm³ and 0.3 mm³ for CBCT; 80 and 140 kV in MSCT). DICOM data were converted into 3D STL models and evaluated in computer-aided design software. After precise merging of the baseline and post-op models, the surface deviation was calculated, representing the extent of artefacts in the 3D models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with baseline, ZrO<sub>2</sub> emitted 36.5-37.3% (±0.6-0.8) artefacts in the CBCT and 39.2-50.2% (±0.5-1.2) in the MSCT models. Ti-Zr implants produced 4.1-7.1% (±0.3-3.0) artefacts in CBCT and 5.4-15.7% (±0.5-1.3) in MSCT. Significantly more artefacts were found in the MSCT <i>vs</i> CBCT models for both implant materials (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Significantly fewer artefacts were visible in the 3D models from scans with higher kilovolts in MSCT and smaller voxel size in CBCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the four applied protocols, the lowest artefact proportion of ZrO<sub>2</sub> and Ti-Zr implants in STL models was observed with CBCT and the 0.3 mm³ voxel size.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"20230275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10968770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Artefacts from dental implants in three-dimensional (3D) imaging may lead to incorrect representation of anatomical dimensions and impede virtual planning in navigated implantology. The aim of this study was quantitative assessment of artefacts in 3D STL models from cone beam CT (CBCT) and multislice CT (MSCT) using different scanning protocols and titanium-zirconium (Ti-Zr) and zirconium (ZrO2) implant materials.

Methods: Three ZrO2 and three Ti-Zr implants were respectively placed in the mandibles of two fresh human specimens. Before (baseline) and after implant placement, 3D digital imaging scans were performed (10 repetitions per timepoint: voxel size 0.2 mm³ and 0.3 mm³ for CBCT; 80 and 140 kV in MSCT). DICOM data were converted into 3D STL models and evaluated in computer-aided design software. After precise merging of the baseline and post-op models, the surface deviation was calculated, representing the extent of artefacts in the 3D models.

Results: Compared with baseline, ZrO2 emitted 36.5-37.3% (±0.6-0.8) artefacts in the CBCT and 39.2-50.2% (±0.5-1.2) in the MSCT models. Ti-Zr implants produced 4.1-7.1% (±0.3-3.0) artefacts in CBCT and 5.4-15.7% (±0.5-1.3) in MSCT. Significantly more artefacts were found in the MSCT vs CBCT models for both implant materials (p < 0.05). Significantly fewer artefacts were visible in the 3D models from scans with higher kilovolts in MSCT and smaller voxel size in CBCT.

Conclusions: Among the four applied protocols, the lowest artefact proportion of ZrO2 and Ti-Zr implants in STL models was observed with CBCT and the 0.3 mm³ voxel size.

多层CT和锥形束CT三维虚拟模型中氧化锆和钛植入物伪影的定量分析:扫描方案重要吗?
目的:在三维(3D)成像中,牙科植入物的艺术可能会导致解剖尺寸的错误表示,并阻碍导航植入学中的虚拟规划。本研究的目的是使用不同的扫描方案以及钛锆(Ti-Zr)和锆(ZrO2)植入材料,定量评估锥形束CT(CBCT)和多层螺旋CT(MSCT)的3D STL模型中的伪影。方法:将三个ZrO2和三个Ti-Zr植入物分别植入两个新鲜人的下颌骨。在植入物放置之前(基线)和之后,进行3D数字成像扫描(每个时间点重复10次:体素大小0.2 mm³和0.3 mm³,用于CBCT;在MSCT中为80和140kV)。DICOM数据被转换成3D STL模型,并在计算机辅助设计软件中进行评估。在精确合并基线模型和术后模型后,计算表面偏差,表示3D模型中伪影的程度。结果:与基线相比,ZrO2在CBCT中发射36.5-37.3%(±0.6-0.8)的伪影,在MSCT模型中发射39.2-50.2%(±0.5-1.2)的伪像。Ti-Zr植入物在CBCT中产生4.1-7.1%(±0.3-3.0)的伪影,在MSCT中产生5.4-15.7%(±0.5-1.3)的伪像。对于两种植入材料,在MSCT和CBCT模型中发现的伪影明显更多(p<0.05)。在MSCT中千伏电压较高、CBCT中体素大小较小的扫描中,在3D模型中可见的伪影显著较少。结论:在四种应用方案中,用CBCT观察到STL模型中ZrO2和Ti-Zr植入物的伪影比例最低,0.3 mm³体素大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信