Understanding the Context for Incorporating Equity into Quality Improvement Throughout a National Health Care System.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2023-05-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0009
Leslie R M Hausmann, Carolyn Lamorte, Jamie L Estock
{"title":"Understanding the Context for Incorporating Equity into Quality Improvement Throughout a National Health Care System.","authors":"Leslie R M Hausmann,&nbsp;Carolyn Lamorte,&nbsp;Jamie L Estock","doi":"10.1089/heq.2023.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although health care systems aspire to deliver equitable care, practical tools that empower the health care workforce to weave equity throughout quality improvement (QI) processes are lacking. In this article, we report findings from context of use interviews that informed the development of a user-centered tool to support equity-focused QI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted from February to April of 2019. Participants included 14 medical center administrators, departmental or service line leaders, and clinical staff involved in direct patient care from three Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers within a single region. Interviews covered existing practices for monitoring health care quality (i.e., priorities, tasks, workflow, and resources) and explored how equity data might fit into current processes. Themes extracted through rapid qualitative analysis were used to draft initial functional requirements for a tool to support equity-focused QI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the potential value of examining disparities in health care quality was clearly recognized, the data necessary for examining disparities were lacking for most quality measures. Interviewees also desired guidance on how inequities could be addressed through QI. The ways in which QI initiatives were selected, carried out, and supported also had important design implications for tools to support equity-focused QI.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The themes identified in this work guided the development of a national VA Primary Care Equity Dashboard to support equity-focused QI within VA. Understanding the ways in which QI was carried out across multiple levels of the organization provided a successful foundation upon which to build functional tools to support thoughtful engagement around equity in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"7 1","pages":"312-320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although health care systems aspire to deliver equitable care, practical tools that empower the health care workforce to weave equity throughout quality improvement (QI) processes are lacking. In this article, we report findings from context of use interviews that informed the development of a user-centered tool to support equity-focused QI.

Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted from February to April of 2019. Participants included 14 medical center administrators, departmental or service line leaders, and clinical staff involved in direct patient care from three Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers within a single region. Interviews covered existing practices for monitoring health care quality (i.e., priorities, tasks, workflow, and resources) and explored how equity data might fit into current processes. Themes extracted through rapid qualitative analysis were used to draft initial functional requirements for a tool to support equity-focused QI.

Results: Although the potential value of examining disparities in health care quality was clearly recognized, the data necessary for examining disparities were lacking for most quality measures. Interviewees also desired guidance on how inequities could be addressed through QI. The ways in which QI initiatives were selected, carried out, and supported also had important design implications for tools to support equity-focused QI.

Discussion: The themes identified in this work guided the development of a national VA Primary Care Equity Dashboard to support equity-focused QI within VA. Understanding the ways in which QI was carried out across multiple levels of the organization provided a successful foundation upon which to build functional tools to support thoughtful engagement around equity in clinical settings.

Abstract Image

理解将公平纳入整个国家医疗保健系统质量改进的背景。
目的:尽管医疗保健系统渴望提供公平的护理,但缺乏能够使医疗保健工作人员在整个质量改进过程中实现公平的实用工具。在这篇文章中,我们报告了使用访谈的结果,这些结果为开发以用户为中心的工具来支持以公平为中心的QI提供了信息。方法:于2019年2月至4月进行半结构化访谈。参与者包括14名医疗中心管理人员、部门或服务线领导,以及来自同一地区三个退伍军人事务(VA)医疗中心的参与直接患者护理的临床工作人员。访谈涵盖了监测医疗保健质量的现有做法(即优先事项、任务、工作流程和资源),并探讨了公平数据如何适应当前流程。通过快速定性分析提取的主题用于起草工具的初始功能要求,以支持以股权为重点的QI。结果:尽管人们清楚地认识到检查医疗保健质量差异的潜在价值,但大多数质量指标都缺乏检查差异所需的数据。受访者还希望获得如何通过QI解决不公平问题的指导。选择、实施和支持合格中介机构倡议的方式也对支持以公平为重点的合格中介机构的工具具有重要的设计意义。讨论:这项工作中确定的主题指导了国家弗吉尼亚州初级保健公平仪表板的开发,以支持弗吉尼亚州内以公平为重点的合格中介机构。了解在组织的多个层面开展合格中介机构的方式,为建立功能工具以支持临床环境中围绕公平的深思熟虑的参与提供了成功的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信