The 5-Year Disease-Free Survival of Third Generation Aromatase Inhibitor for Postmenopausal Women with HR-Positive HER2-Negative Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Q3 Medicine
Ria Etikasari, Tri Murti Andayani, Dwi Endarti, Kartika Widayati Taroeno-Hariadi
{"title":"The 5-Year Disease-Free Survival of Third Generation Aromatase Inhibitor for Postmenopausal Women with HR-Positive HER2-Negative Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer.","authors":"Ria Etikasari,&nbsp;Tri Murti Andayani,&nbsp;Dwi Endarti,&nbsp;Kartika Widayati Taroeno-Hariadi","doi":"10.18502/ijhoscr.v17i1.11713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Several studies showed the superiority of aromatase inhibitor (AI) as first-line therapy for patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer (BC). For the clinician, studies in the real world are warranted to determine treatment based on the efficacy of each drug. We compared a 5-y disease-free survival (DFS) of each AI in terms of survival benefit. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We evaluated 450 medical records of postmenopausal women who were diagnosed with HR-positive HER2-negative BC (stage I - III) at Dr. Sardjito General Hospital from January to December 2019. All patients had undergone surgery and chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Moreover, study participants received anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane for at least one year. Kaplan Meier estimation survival curve was used to analyze the survival rate. <b>Result:</b> Of 79 patients meeting inclusion criteria, there were 21.52% distant metastases documented. Time to disease progression of anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane was 49 months, 58 months, and 53 months, respectively. Letrozole was found better than anastrozole (hazard ratio (HR)=4.342, 95% CI 0.95-19.95; p=0.038). Letrozole versus exemestane (HR=2.757, 95% CI 0.53-14.33; p=0,206) and anastrozole versus exemestane (HR=1.652, 95% CI 0.56-4.84; p=0.351) were found not significantly different. 5-y DFS rate of letrozole was better found (87.5%) than exemestane (73.7%) and anastrozole (61.4%). <b>Conclusion:</b> 5-year letrozole administration could be proposed as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with HR-positive HER2-negative BC. A considerable subject and long-term follow-up are needed for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":38991,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"48-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/41/7a/IJHOSCR-17-48.PMC10448920.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v17i1.11713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several studies showed the superiority of aromatase inhibitor (AI) as first-line therapy for patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer (BC). For the clinician, studies in the real world are warranted to determine treatment based on the efficacy of each drug. We compared a 5-y disease-free survival (DFS) of each AI in terms of survival benefit. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 450 medical records of postmenopausal women who were diagnosed with HR-positive HER2-negative BC (stage I - III) at Dr. Sardjito General Hospital from January to December 2019. All patients had undergone surgery and chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Moreover, study participants received anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane for at least one year. Kaplan Meier estimation survival curve was used to analyze the survival rate. Result: Of 79 patients meeting inclusion criteria, there were 21.52% distant metastases documented. Time to disease progression of anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane was 49 months, 58 months, and 53 months, respectively. Letrozole was found better than anastrozole (hazard ratio (HR)=4.342, 95% CI 0.95-19.95; p=0.038). Letrozole versus exemestane (HR=2.757, 95% CI 0.53-14.33; p=0,206) and anastrozole versus exemestane (HR=1.652, 95% CI 0.56-4.84; p=0.351) were found not significantly different. 5-y DFS rate of letrozole was better found (87.5%) than exemestane (73.7%) and anastrozole (61.4%). Conclusion: 5-year letrozole administration could be proposed as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with HR-positive HER2-negative BC. A considerable subject and long-term follow-up are needed for validation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

第三代芳香化酶抑制剂治疗绝经后hr阳性her2阴性非转移性乳腺癌的5年无病生存率
背景:几项研究显示芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)作为激素受体(HR)阳性乳腺癌(BC)患者一线治疗的优势。对于临床医生来说,现实世界的研究是有必要的,以每种药物的疗效为基础来确定治疗方法。我们比较了每一种人工智能的5年无病生存期(DFS)。材料和方法:我们评估了2019年1月至12月在Dr. Sardjito总医院诊断为hr阳性her2阴性BC (I - III期)的450名绝经后妇女的医疗记录。所有患者均接受了手术、化疗或放疗。此外,研究参与者接受阿那曲唑、来曲唑或依西美坦治疗至少一年。采用Kaplan Meier估计生存曲线分析生存率。结果:符合入选标准的79例患者中,有21.52%有远处转移记录。阿那曲唑、来曲唑和依西美坦的疾病进展时间分别为49个月、58个月和53个月。来曲唑优于阿那曲唑(风险比(HR)=4.342, 95% CI 0.95 ~ 19.95;p = 0.038)。来曲唑vs依西美坦(HR=2.757, 95% CI 0.53-14.33;p=0,206)和阿那曲唑与依西美坦(HR=1.652, 95% CI 0.56-4.84;P =0.351),差异无统计学意义。来曲唑的5-y DFS率(87.5%)高于依西美坦(73.7%)和阿那曲唑(61.4%)。结论:5年来曲唑可作为hr阳性her2阴性BC绝经后妇女的一线治疗。需要大量的受试者和长期随访来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信