Assessing the Efficacy of Mitoxantrone and Doxorubicin as Frontline Anthracyclines During Induction Therapy of Newly Diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia.

Q1 Medicine
José C Jaime-Pérez, Eugenia M Ramos-Dávila, Jesús D Meléndez-Flores, Mariana González-Treviño, David Gómez-Almaguer
{"title":"Assessing the Efficacy of Mitoxantrone and Doxorubicin as Frontline Anthracyclines During Induction Therapy of Newly Diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia.","authors":"José C Jaime-Pérez,&nbsp;Eugenia M Ramos-Dávila,&nbsp;Jesús D Meléndez-Flores,&nbsp;Mariana González-Treviño,&nbsp;David Gómez-Almaguer","doi":"10.56875/2589-0646.1090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic advances in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) have transformed it into today's most curable form of leukemia. However, recommended agents, including arsenic trioxide, idarubicin, or daunorubicin, are not easily available in low-middle-income countries, where outcomes remain suboptimal. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of more accessible anthracyclines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study including sixty-one patients diagnosed with APL over a 15-year period. Patients received low-dose all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA, 25 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) with mitoxantrone or doxorubicin as an induction to remission therapy. Groups were compared using the χ<sup>2</sup> and Student's t-tests. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for survival analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty (49.18%) patients received mitoxantrone, and 31 (50.82%) received doxorubicin. The median follow-up was 24.6 months (1-146). Twenty-eight (93.3%) patients achieved complete remission (CR) in the mitoxantrone group and 28 (87.1%) in the doxorubicin group (p=0.103), and the median time to CR was 40 and 31 days, respectively. Mitoxantrone had a 6.7% early mortality rate and a 16.7% relapse rate compared with doxorubicin (3.2% and 32.3%, respectively). No differences were found in survival (p = 0.795), hospitalization days (p = 0.261), or adverse events (p = 0.554).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using mitoxantrone or doxorubicin as induction therapy in newly diagnosed APL is a safe and adequate alternative with comparable outcomes to first-line agents in scenarios where the latter might not be readily available, such as in low-middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":39226,"journal":{"name":"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"13-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56875/2589-0646.1090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic advances in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) have transformed it into today's most curable form of leukemia. However, recommended agents, including arsenic trioxide, idarubicin, or daunorubicin, are not easily available in low-middle-income countries, where outcomes remain suboptimal. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of more accessible anthracyclines.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including sixty-one patients diagnosed with APL over a 15-year period. Patients received low-dose all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA, 25 mg/m2) with mitoxantrone or doxorubicin as an induction to remission therapy. Groups were compared using the χ2 and Student's t-tests. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for survival analyses.

Results: Thirty (49.18%) patients received mitoxantrone, and 31 (50.82%) received doxorubicin. The median follow-up was 24.6 months (1-146). Twenty-eight (93.3%) patients achieved complete remission (CR) in the mitoxantrone group and 28 (87.1%) in the doxorubicin group (p=0.103), and the median time to CR was 40 and 31 days, respectively. Mitoxantrone had a 6.7% early mortality rate and a 16.7% relapse rate compared with doxorubicin (3.2% and 32.3%, respectively). No differences were found in survival (p = 0.795), hospitalization days (p = 0.261), or adverse events (p = 0.554).

Conclusions: Using mitoxantrone or doxorubicin as induction therapy in newly diagnosed APL is a safe and adequate alternative with comparable outcomes to first-line agents in scenarios where the latter might not be readily available, such as in low-middle-income countries.

评价米托蒽醌与阿霉素作为一线蒽环类药物在新诊断急性早幼粒细胞白血病诱导治疗中的疗效。
背景:急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)的治疗进展已将其转变为当今最可治愈的白血病形式。然而,推荐的药物,包括三氧化二砷、依甲红霉素或柔红霉素,在中低收入国家并不容易获得,那里的结果仍然不理想。我们的目的是评估更容易获得的蒽环类药物的有效性和安全性。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括61名诊断为APL的患者,时间超过15年。患者接受低剂量全反式维甲酸(ATRA, 25mg /m2)联合米托蒽醌或阿霉素诱导缓解治疗。组间比较采用χ2和学生t检验。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier分析。结果:30例(49.18%)患者使用米托蒽醌,31例(50.82%)患者使用阿霉素。中位随访时间为24.6个月(1-146)。米托蒽酮组28例(93.3%)患者达到完全缓解(CR),阿霉素组28例(87.1%)患者达到完全缓解(CR) (p=0.103),达到CR的中位时间分别为40天和31天。与阿霉素相比,米托蒽醌的早期死亡率为6.7%,复发率为16.7%(分别为3.2%和32.3%)。生存率(p = 0.795)、住院天数(p = 0.261)和不良事件(p = 0.554)均无差异。结论:使用米托蒽醌或阿霉素作为新诊断APL的诱导治疗是一种安全且充分的替代方案,在一线药物可能不容易获得的情况下,如在中低收入国家,其结果与一线药物相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematology Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that provides a vehicle for publications of high-quality clinical as well as basic science research reports in hematology and oncology. The contents of the journal also emphasize the growing importance of hematopoietic stem cell therapy for treatment of various benign and malignant hematologic disorders and certain solid tumors.The journal prioritizes publication of original research articles but also would give consideration for brief reports, review articles, special communications, and unique case reports. It also offers a special section for clinically relevant images that provide an important educational value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信