Patient Dietary Supplements Use: Do Results from Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes Agree with Survey Data?

Q1 Medicine
Douglas Redd, Terri Elizabeth Workman, Yijun Shao, Yan Cheng, Senait Tekle, Jennifer H Garvin, Cynthia A Brandt, Qing Zeng-Treitler
{"title":"Patient Dietary Supplements Use: Do Results from Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes Agree with Survey Data?","authors":"Douglas Redd,&nbsp;Terri Elizabeth Workman,&nbsp;Yijun Shao,&nbsp;Yan Cheng,&nbsp;Senait Tekle,&nbsp;Jennifer H Garvin,&nbsp;Cynthia A Brandt,&nbsp;Qing Zeng-Treitler","doi":"10.3390/medsci11020037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is widespread use of dietary supplements, some prescribed but many taken without a physician's guidance. There are many potential interactions between supplements and both over-the-counter and prescription medications in ways that are unknown to patients. Structured medical records do not adequately document supplement use; however, unstructured clinical notes often contain extra information on supplements. We studied a group of 377 patients from three healthcare facilities and developed a natural language processing (NLP) tool to detect supplement use. Using surveys of these patients, we investigated the correlation between self-reported supplement use and NLP extractions from the clinical notes. Our model achieved an F1 score of 0.914 for detecting all supplements. Individual supplement detection had a variable correlation with survey responses, ranging from an F1 of 0.83 for calcium to an F1 of 0.39 for folic acid. Our study demonstrated good NLP performance while also finding that self-reported supplement use is not always consistent with the documented use in clinical records.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci11020037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is widespread use of dietary supplements, some prescribed but many taken without a physician's guidance. There are many potential interactions between supplements and both over-the-counter and prescription medications in ways that are unknown to patients. Structured medical records do not adequately document supplement use; however, unstructured clinical notes often contain extra information on supplements. We studied a group of 377 patients from three healthcare facilities and developed a natural language processing (NLP) tool to detect supplement use. Using surveys of these patients, we investigated the correlation between self-reported supplement use and NLP extractions from the clinical notes. Our model achieved an F1 score of 0.914 for detecting all supplements. Individual supplement detection had a variable correlation with survey responses, ranging from an F1 of 0.83 for calcium to an F1 of 0.39 for folic acid. Our study demonstrated good NLP performance while also finding that self-reported supplement use is not always consistent with the documented use in clinical records.

患者膳食补充剂的使用:临床记录的自然语言处理结果与调查数据一致吗?
膳食补充剂的使用很广泛,有些是处方药,但很多是在没有医生指导的情况下服用的。补充剂与非处方药和处方药之间有许多潜在的相互作用,而这些作用是患者所不知道的。结构化的医疗记录没有充分记录补充剂的使用;然而,非结构化的临床记录通常包含有关补充剂的额外信息。我们研究了来自三家医疗机构的377名患者,并开发了一种自然语言处理(NLP)工具来检测补充剂的使用。通过对这些患者的调查,我们调查了自我报告的补充剂使用与临床记录中NLP提取之间的相关性。我们的模型检测所有补充剂的F1得分为0.914。个别补充剂检测与调查结果有可变的相关性,从钙的F1为0.83到叶酸的F1为0.39不等。我们的研究显示了良好的NLP表现,同时也发现自我报告的补充剂使用情况并不总是与临床记录中的记录一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信