Quantitative Indices of Student Social Media Engagement in Tertiary Education: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy.

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Aida Tarifa-Rodriguez, Javier Virues-Ortega, Agustin Perez-Bustamante Pereira, Ana Calero-Elvira, Sarah Cowie
{"title":"Quantitative Indices of Student Social Media Engagement in Tertiary Education: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy.","authors":"Aida Tarifa-Rodriguez, Javier Virues-Ortega, Agustin Perez-Bustamante Pereira, Ana Calero-Elvira, Sarah Cowie","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09516-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies have evaluated the use of social media as learning aids in tertiary education. Emerging research in this area has focused primarily on non-quantitative approaches to student social media engagement. However, quantitative engagement outcomes may be extracted from student posts, comments, likes, and views. The goal of the present review was to provide a research-informed taxonomy of quantitative and behavior-based metrics of student social media engagement. We selected 75 empirical studies comprising a pooled sample of 11,605 tertiary education students. Included studies used social media for educational purposes and reported student social media engagement outcomes (source databases: PsycInfo and ERIC). We used independent raters and stringent interrater agreement and data extraction processes to mitigate bias during the screening of references. Over half of the studies (52%, <i>n</i> = 39) utilized ad hoc interviews and surveys to estimate student social media engagement, whereas thirty-three studies (44%) used some form of quantitative analysis of engagement. Based on this literature, we present a selection of count-based, time-based, and text-analysis metrics. The proposed taxonomy of engagement metrics resulting provides the methodological basis for the analysis of social media behavior in educational settings, particularly, for human operant and behavioral education studies. Implications for future research are discussed.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10864-023-09516-6.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10090751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09516-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies have evaluated the use of social media as learning aids in tertiary education. Emerging research in this area has focused primarily on non-quantitative approaches to student social media engagement. However, quantitative engagement outcomes may be extracted from student posts, comments, likes, and views. The goal of the present review was to provide a research-informed taxonomy of quantitative and behavior-based metrics of student social media engagement. We selected 75 empirical studies comprising a pooled sample of 11,605 tertiary education students. Included studies used social media for educational purposes and reported student social media engagement outcomes (source databases: PsycInfo and ERIC). We used independent raters and stringent interrater agreement and data extraction processes to mitigate bias during the screening of references. Over half of the studies (52%, n = 39) utilized ad hoc interviews and surveys to estimate student social media engagement, whereas thirty-three studies (44%) used some form of quantitative analysis of engagement. Based on this literature, we present a selection of count-based, time-based, and text-analysis metrics. The proposed taxonomy of engagement metrics resulting provides the methodological basis for the analysis of social media behavior in educational settings, particularly, for human operant and behavioral education studies. Implications for future research are discussed.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10864-023-09516-6.

Abstract Image

高等教育学生社交媒体参与的量化指标:系统综述和分类。
最近的研究评估了在高等教育中使用社交媒体作为学习辅助工具的情况。这一领域的新兴研究主要集中在学生社交媒体参与的非量化方法上。然而,可以从学生的帖子、评论、点赞和观点中提取定量的参与结果。本综述的目的是提供一种基于研究的分类法,对学生社交媒体参与的定量和基于行为的指标进行分类。我们选择了75项实证研究,包括11605名高等教育学生的集合样本。纳入的研究将社交媒体用于教育目的,并报告了学生社交媒体参与的结果(来源数据库:PsycInfo和ERIC)。在筛选参考文献的过程中,我们使用了独立的评分者和严格的评分者间协议和数据提取过程来减轻偏见。超过一半的研究(52%,n = 39)利用临时采访和调查来评估学生的社交媒体参与度,而33项研究(44%)使用了某种形式的参与度定量分析。基于这些文献,我们提出了一系列基于计数、基于时间和文本的分析指标。所提出的参与度指标分类法为分析教育环境中的社交媒体行为,特别是人类操作和行为教育研究提供了方法学基础。讨论了对未来研究的启示。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,请访问10.1007/s10864-023-09516-6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Education
Journal of Behavioral Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Education is an international forum dedicated to publishing original research papers on the application of behavioral principles and technology to education. Education is defined broadly and the journal places no restriction on the types of participants involved in the reported studies--including by age, ability, or setting. Each quarterly issue presents empirical research investigating best-practices and innovative methods to address a wide range of educational targets and issues pertaining to the needs of diverse learners and to implementation. The Journal of Behavioral Education is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal whose target audience is educational researchers and practitioners including general and special education teachers, school psychologists, and other school personnel.  Rigorous experimental designs, including single-subject with replication and group designs are considered for publication. An emphasis is placed on direct observation measures of the primary dependent variable in studies of educational issues, problems, and practices.  Discussion articles and critical reviews also are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信