Experience of Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis in Patients Scheduled for Open Surgery for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

IF 0.6 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Kiyoshi Tanaka, Shinsuke Mii, Masaru Ishida, Atsushi Guntani, Sho Yamashita, Shun Kurose, Jin Okazaki, Eisuke Kawakubo
{"title":"Experience of Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis in Patients Scheduled for Open Surgery for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.","authors":"Kiyoshi Tanaka,&nbsp;Shinsuke Mii,&nbsp;Masaru Ishida,&nbsp;Atsushi Guntani,&nbsp;Sho Yamashita,&nbsp;Shun Kurose,&nbsp;Jin Okazaki,&nbsp;Eisuke Kawakubo","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.22-00131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To estimate the effectiveness of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) for severe aortic stenosis (SAS) in patients scheduled for open surgery for chronic limb-threatening ischemia. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Clinical data of patients from 2012 to 2018 were retrieved and summarized. The early outcomes and survival after BAV and open bypass were retrospectively investigated. <b>Results:</b> BAV was performed on seven dialysis patients. One patient died of mesenteric infarction 3 days after BAV; however, six patients were able to undergo open bypass at an average of 10 days (7-19 days) after BAV. One patient died of hemorrhagic shock before the wound healed; five patients underwent limb salvage. Four of these five patients could not undergo surgical aortic open valve replacement owing to advanced age or poor cardiac function and died within 2 years. Only one patient who underwent radical surgery after a bypass survived more than 4 years. <b>Conclusion:</b> BAV enabled open surgery and limb salvage in patients with SAS. Although BAV alone cannot ensure long-term survival, the procedure will continue to be important as a bridge technique to radical surgery, such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation and aortic valve repair, which are often avoided owing to infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"16 2","pages":"108-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/7e/avd-16-2-oa.22-00131.PMC10288117.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.22-00131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the effectiveness of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) for severe aortic stenosis (SAS) in patients scheduled for open surgery for chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Materials and Methods: Clinical data of patients from 2012 to 2018 were retrieved and summarized. The early outcomes and survival after BAV and open bypass were retrospectively investigated. Results: BAV was performed on seven dialysis patients. One patient died of mesenteric infarction 3 days after BAV; however, six patients were able to undergo open bypass at an average of 10 days (7-19 days) after BAV. One patient died of hemorrhagic shock before the wound healed; five patients underwent limb salvage. Four of these five patients could not undergo surgical aortic open valve replacement owing to advanced age or poor cardiac function and died within 2 years. Only one patient who underwent radical surgery after a bypass survived more than 4 years. Conclusion: BAV enabled open surgery and limb salvage in patients with SAS. Although BAV alone cannot ensure long-term survival, the procedure will continue to be important as a bridge technique to radical surgery, such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation and aortic valve repair, which are often avoided owing to infection.

球囊主动脉瓣成形术治疗严重主动脉狭窄患者因慢性肢体缺血而行开放手术的经验。
目的:评价球囊主动脉瓣成形术(BAV)治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄(SAS)的有效性。材料与方法:检索我院2012 ~ 2018年患者的临床资料并进行汇总。回顾性研究BAV和开放旁路术后的早期预后和生存率。结果:7例透析患者行BAV治疗。1例BAV后3天死于肠系膜梗死;然而,6例患者在BAV后平均10天(7-19天)能够进行开放旁路手术。1例患者在伤口愈合前死于失血性休克;5例患者行肢体保留术。5例患者中有4例因年事已高或心功能不佳而不能行主动脉瓣置换术,并在2年内死亡。只有一名患者在搭桥手术后接受了根治性手术,存活超过4年。结论:BAV可用于SAS患者的开放手术和肢体保留。虽然单靠BAV不能保证长期存活,但作为根治性手术(如经导管主动脉瓣植入术和主动脉瓣修复术)的桥梁技术,BAV将继续发挥重要作用,而根治性手术通常因感染而无法进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of vascular diseases
Annals of vascular diseases PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信