"Waiving" Goodbye to PE: State Law and School Exemption and Substitution Practices in the United States.

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Jamie F Chriqui, Julien Leider, Elizabeth Piekarz-Porter, Wanting Lin, Lindsey Turner, Shannon L Michael, Nancy Brener, Frank Perna
{"title":"\"Waiving\" Goodbye to PE: State Law and School Exemption and Substitution Practices in the United States.","authors":"Jamie F Chriqui,&nbsp;Julien Leider,&nbsp;Elizabeth Piekarz-Porter,&nbsp;Wanting Lin,&nbsp;Lindsey Turner,&nbsp;Shannon L Michael,&nbsp;Nancy Brener,&nbsp;Frank Perna","doi":"10.1249/tjx.0000000000000161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The importance of schools providing physical education (PE) and promoting physical activity (PA) and the benefits of PA for children are well documented. However, a majority of students do not get the nationally recommended 60 min of daily PA. Many states grant waivers, substitutions, or exemptions from PE despite national recommendations. This study examined the association between state laws allowing for the use of PE substitutions and exemptions and school-level substitution and exemption practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>School-level PE exemption and substitution data from the 2014 School Health Policies and Practices Study were linked to state law data from the National Wellness Policy Study and the National Cancer Institute's 2013 Classification of Laws Associated with School Students. The analytic sample included 320 schools located in 42 states. Separate multivariable logistic regression models linked five types of school PE exemptions/substitutions to corresponding state laws, controlling for school characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 24 of the 42 states had laws addressing PE waivers, exemptions, or substitutions. Schools had higher odds of allowing PE substitutions for school sports (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 3.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.33-9.68), other school activities (AOR, 8.52; 95% CI, 2.90-25.03), and community sports (AOR, 4.30; 95% CI, 1.43-12.96) and allowing exemptions for fitness test scores (AOR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.49-14.62) or vocational training (AOR, 5.92; 95% CI, 1.04-33.68) if state law allowed it, compared with schools in states that did not allow such practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the connection between PA and beneficial outcomes for children, decision makers, school administrators, practitioners, advocates, and researchers should consider and further examine how PE waiver, exemption, and substitution policies and practices may affect students' PA and related outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75243,"journal":{"name":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282692/pdf/nihms-1891126.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The importance of schools providing physical education (PE) and promoting physical activity (PA) and the benefits of PA for children are well documented. However, a majority of students do not get the nationally recommended 60 min of daily PA. Many states grant waivers, substitutions, or exemptions from PE despite national recommendations. This study examined the association between state laws allowing for the use of PE substitutions and exemptions and school-level substitution and exemption practices.

Methods: School-level PE exemption and substitution data from the 2014 School Health Policies and Practices Study were linked to state law data from the National Wellness Policy Study and the National Cancer Institute's 2013 Classification of Laws Associated with School Students. The analytic sample included 320 schools located in 42 states. Separate multivariable logistic regression models linked five types of school PE exemptions/substitutions to corresponding state laws, controlling for school characteristics.

Results: Overall, 24 of the 42 states had laws addressing PE waivers, exemptions, or substitutions. Schools had higher odds of allowing PE substitutions for school sports (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 3.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.33-9.68), other school activities (AOR, 8.52; 95% CI, 2.90-25.03), and community sports (AOR, 4.30; 95% CI, 1.43-12.96) and allowing exemptions for fitness test scores (AOR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.49-14.62) or vocational training (AOR, 5.92; 95% CI, 1.04-33.68) if state law allowed it, compared with schools in states that did not allow such practices.

Conclusions: Given the connection between PA and beneficial outcomes for children, decision makers, school administrators, practitioners, advocates, and researchers should consider and further examine how PE waiver, exemption, and substitution policies and practices may affect students' PA and related outcomes.

“放弃”告别体育:美国州法与学校的豁免与替代实践。
目的:学校提供体育教育(PE)和促进体育活动(PA)的重要性以及PA对儿童的好处得到了很好的证明。然而,大多数学生没有达到国家推荐的每天60分钟的PA。许多州不顾国家建议,给予体育课豁免、替代或豁免。本研究考察了允许使用体育替代和豁免的州法律与学校层面的替代和豁免实践之间的关系。方法:将2014年学校健康政策与实践研究中的学校体育豁免和替代数据与国家健康政策研究和国家癌症研究所2013年与学生相关的法律分类中的州法律数据联系起来。分析样本包括位于42个州的320所学校。独立的多变量logistic回归模型将五类学校体育豁免/替换与相应的州法律联系起来,控制学校特点。结果:总体而言,42个州中有24个州制定了关于PE豁免、豁免或替代的法律。学校允许体育代替学校体育的几率较高(调整优势比(AOR), 3.59;95%置信区间(CI), 1.33-9.68),其他学校活动(AOR, 8.52;95% CI, 2.90-25.03)和社区体育(AOR, 4.30;95% CI, 1.43-12.96)并允许豁免体能测试分数(AOR, 4.67;95% CI, 1.49-14.62)或职业培训(AOR, 5.92;(95% CI, 1.04-33.68),如果州法律允许这样做,与不允许这样做的州的学校相比。结论:鉴于PA与儿童的有益结果之间的联系,决策者、学校管理者、从业者、倡导者和研究人员应该考虑并进一步研究体育豁免、豁免和替代政策和实践如何影响学生的PA和相关结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信