Interval cancers in a national colorectal screening programme based on faecal immunochemical testing: Implications for faecal haemoglobin concentration threshold and sex inequality.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Medical Screening Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-19 DOI:10.1177/09691413231188252
Gavin Rc Clark, Thomas Godfrey, Calum Purdie, Judith Strachan, Francis A Carey, Callum G Fraser, Robert Jc Steele
{"title":"Interval cancers in a national colorectal screening programme based on faecal immunochemical testing: Implications for faecal haemoglobin concentration threshold and sex inequality.","authors":"Gavin Rc Clark, Thomas Godfrey, Calum Purdie, Judith Strachan, Francis A Carey, Callum G Fraser, Robert Jc Steele","doi":"10.1177/09691413231188252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare interval cancer proportions (ICP) in the faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (SBoSP) with the former guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT)-based SBoSP and investigate associations between interval cancer (IC) and faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) threshold, sex, age, deprivation, site, and stage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ICP data from first year of the FIT-based SBoSP and the penultimate year of the gFOBT-based SBoSP were compared in a prospective cohort design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With FIT, 801 colorectal cancers (CRCs) were screen detected (SDC), 802 were in non-participants, 548 were ICs, 39 were colonoscopy missed and 72 were diagnosed after incomplete screening; with gFOBT: 540, 904, 556, 45, and 13, respectively. FIT had a significantly higher proportion of SDC compared to IC than gFOBT. For FIT and gFOBT, ICP was significantly higher in women than men. As f-Hb threshold increased, ICP increased and, for any f-Hb threshold for men, a lower threshold was required for comparable ICP in women. In Scotland, the current threshold of ≥80 µg Hb/g faeces would have to be lowered to ≥40 µg Hb/g faeces for women to achieve sex equality for ICP. In the FIT-based SBoSP, there were four times as many stage I SDC than IC. This was reversed in advanced stages, with twice as many stage IV CRC diagnosed as IC versus SDC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reducing the numbers of IC requires lowering the f-Hb threshold. Using different f-Hb thresholds for women and men could eliminate the sex disparity, but with additional colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"21-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10878005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413231188252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare interval cancer proportions (ICP) in the faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (SBoSP) with the former guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT)-based SBoSP and investigate associations between interval cancer (IC) and faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) threshold, sex, age, deprivation, site, and stage.

Methods: The ICP data from first year of the FIT-based SBoSP and the penultimate year of the gFOBT-based SBoSP were compared in a prospective cohort design.

Results: With FIT, 801 colorectal cancers (CRCs) were screen detected (SDC), 802 were in non-participants, 548 were ICs, 39 were colonoscopy missed and 72 were diagnosed after incomplete screening; with gFOBT: 540, 904, 556, 45, and 13, respectively. FIT had a significantly higher proportion of SDC compared to IC than gFOBT. For FIT and gFOBT, ICP was significantly higher in women than men. As f-Hb threshold increased, ICP increased and, for any f-Hb threshold for men, a lower threshold was required for comparable ICP in women. In Scotland, the current threshold of ≥80 µg Hb/g faeces would have to be lowered to ≥40 µg Hb/g faeces for women to achieve sex equality for ICP. In the FIT-based SBoSP, there were four times as many stage I SDC than IC. This was reversed in advanced stages, with twice as many stage IV CRC diagnosed as IC versus SDC.

Conclusions: Reducing the numbers of IC requires lowering the f-Hb threshold. Using different f-Hb thresholds for women and men could eliminate the sex disparity, but with additional colonoscopy.

基于粪便免疫化学检测的全国性结直肠癌筛查计划中的间隔期癌症:粪便血红蛋白浓度阈值和性别不平等的影响。
目的比较基于粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)的苏格兰肠道筛查计划(SBoSP)与基于前愈创木脂粪便隐血试验(gFOBT)的苏格兰肠道筛查计划中的间期癌症比例(ICP),并研究间期癌症(IC)与粪便血红蛋白浓度(f-Hb)阈值、性别、年龄、贫困程度、部位和分期之间的关联:方法:采用前瞻性队列设计,比较基于 FIT 的 SBoSP 第一年和基于 gFOBT 的 SBoSP 倒数第二年的 ICP 数据:使用 FIT 时,筛查出 801 例结直肠癌 (CRC),802 例为非参与者,548 例为 IC,39 例为结肠镜检查漏检,72 例为筛查不完全后确诊;使用 gFOBT 时,分别为 540 例、904 例、556 例、45 例和 13 例。与 IC 相比,FIT 的 SDC 比例明显高于 gFOBT。就 FIT 和 gFOBT 而言,女性的 ICP 明显高于男性。随着 f-Hb 临界值的升高,ICP 也随之升高,而且对于任何 f-Hb 临界值的男性而言,女性需要更低的临界值才能获得与之相当的 ICP。在苏格兰,目前≥80 µg Hb/g 粪便的阈值必须降低到≥40 µg Hb/g 粪便,才能实现女性 ICP 的性别平等。在基于 FIT 的 SBoSP 中,I 期 SDC 的数量是 IC 的四倍。在晚期阶段,这种情况发生了逆转,被诊断为 IV 期的 CRC 中,IC 的数量是 SDC 的两倍:结论:减少 IC 的数量需要降低 f-Hb 阈值。对女性和男性使用不同的 f-Hb 临界值可以消除性别差异,但需要额外的结肠镜检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信