Early Outcomes on Triple-Branch Arch Device With Retrograde Left Common Carotid Branch: A Case Series.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-28 DOI:10.1177/15266028231195758
Petroula Nana, Thomas Le Houérou, Julien Guihaire, Antoine Gaudin, Dominique Fabre, Stéphan Haulon
{"title":"Early Outcomes on Triple-Branch Arch Device With Retrograde Left Common Carotid Branch: A Case Series.","authors":"Petroula Nana, Thomas Le Houérou, Julien Guihaire, Antoine Gaudin, Dominique Fabre, Stéphan Haulon","doi":"10.1177/15266028231195758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endovascular aortic arch repair using multibranch devices has been applied in patients considered at high risk for open repair. The aim of this case series was to report the early outcomes in patients managed with a new design 3 branch arch custom-made device, including a retrograde left common carotid artery (LCCA) branch.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Of CaSe Series in Surgery (PROCESS) guidelines were followed. All consecutive patients undergoing endovascular repair of an aortic arch lesion with a custom-made triple-branch device, including a retrograde LCCA branch (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA), between October 27, 2022, and February 28, 2023, were included. The presence of an arch aneurysm (degenerative or post-dissection) with diameter ≥55 mm and high risk for a conventional open repair set the indication for treatment. The primary outcomes were technical success and mortality at 30 days. Early morbidity and reinterventions were considered as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight elective patients (87.5% men, mean age 72.3±27.0 years) were included. Five of them (62.5%) had undergone a previous ascending aorta repair of an acute type A aortic dissection. All patients were asymptomatic, except one, with left recurrent laryngeal nerve compression. The mean maximum aortic diameter was 70.4±21.0 mm. Percutaneous femoral and axillary access was used in all cases except three in which a cut down for right carotid access was performed. Technical success was 100%. Femoral access to the LCCA and implantation of the bridging stent was performed without technical challenges. No death nor cerebrovascular event was recorded during the 30 day follow-up. Five patients (62.5%) presented major complications, 3 related to access needing reintervention and the remaining related to congestive heart failure (CHF), which were managed successfully with medical treatment. Follow-up (range 1-4 month) was uneventful, except for one patient who presented a secondary type Ia endoleak.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our early experience, the presence of a retrograde branch facilitated the revascularization of the LCCA through femoral access, decreasing the risk of cerebrovascular morbidity. Further analyses with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device.Clinical ImpactData arising mainly from the retrograde branch for the revascularization of the LSA are encouraging from a variety of devices. The premiminary experience with a triple-branched arch device, with a retrograde branche for the LSA but also for the LCCA, was associated with no 30 day mortality and 100% technical success.The device's design allowed swift catheterization and completion of the LCCA revascularization using femoral access exclusively.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"802-812"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231195758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endovascular aortic arch repair using multibranch devices has been applied in patients considered at high risk for open repair. The aim of this case series was to report the early outcomes in patients managed with a new design 3 branch arch custom-made device, including a retrograde left common carotid artery (LCCA) branch.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Of CaSe Series in Surgery (PROCESS) guidelines were followed. All consecutive patients undergoing endovascular repair of an aortic arch lesion with a custom-made triple-branch device, including a retrograde LCCA branch (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA), between October 27, 2022, and February 28, 2023, were included. The presence of an arch aneurysm (degenerative or post-dissection) with diameter ≥55 mm and high risk for a conventional open repair set the indication for treatment. The primary outcomes were technical success and mortality at 30 days. Early morbidity and reinterventions were considered as secondary outcomes.

Results: Eight elective patients (87.5% men, mean age 72.3±27.0 years) were included. Five of them (62.5%) had undergone a previous ascending aorta repair of an acute type A aortic dissection. All patients were asymptomatic, except one, with left recurrent laryngeal nerve compression. The mean maximum aortic diameter was 70.4±21.0 mm. Percutaneous femoral and axillary access was used in all cases except three in which a cut down for right carotid access was performed. Technical success was 100%. Femoral access to the LCCA and implantation of the bridging stent was performed without technical challenges. No death nor cerebrovascular event was recorded during the 30 day follow-up. Five patients (62.5%) presented major complications, 3 related to access needing reintervention and the remaining related to congestive heart failure (CHF), which were managed successfully with medical treatment. Follow-up (range 1-4 month) was uneventful, except for one patient who presented a secondary type Ia endoleak.

Conclusions: According to our early experience, the presence of a retrograde branch facilitated the revascularization of the LCCA through femoral access, decreasing the risk of cerebrovascular morbidity. Further analyses with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device.Clinical ImpactData arising mainly from the retrograde branch for the revascularization of the LSA are encouraging from a variety of devices. The premiminary experience with a triple-branched arch device, with a retrograde branche for the LSA but also for the LCCA, was associated with no 30 day mortality and 100% technical success.The device's design allowed swift catheterization and completion of the LCCA revascularization using femoral access exclusively.

颈总动脉左支逆行的三支弓装置的早期疗效:一个病例系列。
导读:血管内多分支装置修复主动脉弓已被应用于开放性修复高危患者。本病例系列的目的是报告使用新设计的3支弓定制装置的患者的早期结果,包括左颈总动脉(LCCA)逆行分支。方法:遵循外科首选病例系列报告(PROCESS)指南。所有在2022年10月27日至2023年2月28日期间连续接受主动脉弓病变血管内修复的患者均使用定制的三支装置,包括逆行LCCA分支(Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA)。存在直径≥55mm的拱形动脉瘤(退行性或夹层后),常规开放式修复的高风险确定了治疗指征。主要结局是技术成功和30天死亡率。早期发病和再干预被认为是次要结局。结果:择期纳入8例患者(男性87.5%,平均年龄72.3±27.0岁)。其中5例(62.5%)曾因急性a型主动脉夹层行过升主动脉修复术。除1例左喉返神经受压外,其余患者无症状。平均最大主动脉直径为70.4±21.0 mm。所有病例均采用经皮股骨和腋窝通道,其中3例为右颈动脉通道。技术上的成功率是100%。股骨进入LCCA和桥式支架的植入没有技术上的挑战。在30天的随访中,无死亡或脑血管事件记录。5例患者(62.5%)出现严重并发症,3例与通道需要再干预有关,其余与充血性心力衰竭(CHF)有关,经药物治疗成功。随访(1-4个月)无大的变化,除了一名患者出现继发性Ia型渗漏。结论:根据我们早期的经验,逆行分支的存在促进了LCCA通过股骨通路的血运重建,降低了脑血管发病率的风险。需要更长时间随访的进一步分析来评估该装置的安全性和有效性。临床影响主要来自逆行分支的LSA血运重建的数据是令人鼓舞的,来自各种设备。使用三支弓装置的初步经验,包括逆行分支用于LSA,也用于LCCA,与30天死亡率和100%的技术成功相关。该装置的设计允许快速置管和完成LCCA血运重建术,仅使用股骨通道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信