{"title":"Usefulness and limitations of intraoperative pathological diagnosis using frozen sections for spinal cord tumors","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2023.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intraoperative pathological diagnosis has a major influence on the intra- and postoperative management<span> of spinal cord tumors<span>. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the reliability of intraoperative pathological diagnosis for spinal cord lesions by comparing it with the final pathological diagnosis and to determine its usefulness and limitations.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Three-hundred and three consecutive patients (mean age, 53.9 years) with neoplastic spinal cord lesions who underwent initial surgery between 2000 and 2021 were included. The anatomical locations of the spinal cord tumors and the implementation rate of intraoperative pathological diagnosis in each tumor type were evaluated. As the primary outcome, we determined the concordance rates between the intraoperative pathological diagnosis and the final diagnosis. When the intraoperative pathological diagnosis and final diagnosis were the same, the diagnosis was defined as a “match.” Otherwise, the diagnosis was defined as a “mismatch.”</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The overall implementation rate of intraoperative pathological diagnosis was 53%, with implementation rates of 71%, 45%, 47%, and 50% for intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, extradural, and dumbbell tumors, respectively. The overall concordance rate was 87.6%, with concordance rates of 80%, 95%, 75%, and 90% for intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, extradural, and dumbbell tumors, respectively (p < 0.05). The diagnoses of ependymomas, low-grade </span>astrocytomas, and high-grade astrocytomas was occasionally difficult among intramedullary tumors. Among intradural extramedullary tumors, differentiation between grade 1 meningioma and high-grade meningioma was difficult using intraoperative pathological diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Surgeons must recognize the lower accuracy of intraoperative pathological diagnosis for intramedullary and extradural lesions and make a final decision by considering the intraoperative gross findings, preoperative clinical course, and imaging.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":"29 5","pages":"Pages 1162-1167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0949265823002208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Intraoperative pathological diagnosis has a major influence on the intra- and postoperative management of spinal cord tumors. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the reliability of intraoperative pathological diagnosis for spinal cord lesions by comparing it with the final pathological diagnosis and to determine its usefulness and limitations.
Method
Three-hundred and three consecutive patients (mean age, 53.9 years) with neoplastic spinal cord lesions who underwent initial surgery between 2000 and 2021 were included. The anatomical locations of the spinal cord tumors and the implementation rate of intraoperative pathological diagnosis in each tumor type were evaluated. As the primary outcome, we determined the concordance rates between the intraoperative pathological diagnosis and the final diagnosis. When the intraoperative pathological diagnosis and final diagnosis were the same, the diagnosis was defined as a “match.” Otherwise, the diagnosis was defined as a “mismatch.”
Results
The overall implementation rate of intraoperative pathological diagnosis was 53%, with implementation rates of 71%, 45%, 47%, and 50% for intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, extradural, and dumbbell tumors, respectively. The overall concordance rate was 87.6%, with concordance rates of 80%, 95%, 75%, and 90% for intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, extradural, and dumbbell tumors, respectively (p < 0.05). The diagnoses of ependymomas, low-grade astrocytomas, and high-grade astrocytomas was occasionally difficult among intramedullary tumors. Among intradural extramedullary tumors, differentiation between grade 1 meningioma and high-grade meningioma was difficult using intraoperative pathological diagnosis.
Conclusions
Surgeons must recognize the lower accuracy of intraoperative pathological diagnosis for intramedullary and extradural lesions and make a final decision by considering the intraoperative gross findings, preoperative clinical course, and imaging.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.