Diagnostic Yield of Combined Lumbar Puncture and Brain MRI in Critically Ill Patients With Unexplained Acute Encephalopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Meghan E Nothem, Alan G Salazar, Rahul S Nanchal, Paul A Bergl
{"title":"Diagnostic Yield of Combined Lumbar Puncture and Brain MRI in Critically Ill Patients With Unexplained Acute Encephalopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Meghan E Nothem,&nbsp;Alan G Salazar,&nbsp;Rahul S Nanchal,&nbsp;Paul A Bergl","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critically ill patients frequently experience acute encephalopathy, often colloquially termed \"altered mental status\" (AMS); however, there are no consensus guidelines or criteria about performing lumbar puncture (LP) and advanced neuroimaging in medical ICU patients with unexplained encephalopathy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to characterize the yield of combined LP and brain MRI (bMRI) in such patients as determined by both the frequency of abnormal results and the therapeutic efficacy of these investigations, that is, how often results changed management.</p><p><strong>Design setting and participants: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of medical ICU patients admitted to a tertiary academic center between 2012 and 2018 who had documented diagnoses of \"AMS\" and/or synonymous terms, no clear etiology of encephalopathy, and had undergone both LP and bMRI.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the frequency of abnormal diagnostic testing results determined objectively for LP using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings and subjectively for bMRI through team agreement on imaging findings deemed significant through retrospective chart review. We subjectively determined the frequency of therapeutic efficacy. Finally, we analyzed the effect of other clinical variables on the likelihood of discovering abnormal CSF and bMRI findings through chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred four patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty patients (48.1%) had an abnormal CSF profile or definitive microbiological or cytological data by LP, 44 patients (42.3%) had bMRI with significant abnormal findings, and 74 patients (71.2%) had abnormal results on at least one of these investigations. Few clinical variables were associated with the abnormal findings in either investigation. We judged 24.0% (25/104) of bMRI and 26.0% (27/104) of LPs to have therapeutic efficacy with moderate interobserver reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Determining when to perform combined LP and bMRI in ICU patients with unexplained acute encephalopathy must rely on clinical judgment. These investigations have a reasonable yield in this selected population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 7","pages":"e0936"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/86/f3/cc9-5-e0936.PMC10292734.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critically ill patients frequently experience acute encephalopathy, often colloquially termed "altered mental status" (AMS); however, there are no consensus guidelines or criteria about performing lumbar puncture (LP) and advanced neuroimaging in medical ICU patients with unexplained encephalopathy.

Objectives: We sought to characterize the yield of combined LP and brain MRI (bMRI) in such patients as determined by both the frequency of abnormal results and the therapeutic efficacy of these investigations, that is, how often results changed management.

Design setting and participants: Retrospective cohort study of medical ICU patients admitted to a tertiary academic center between 2012 and 2018 who had documented diagnoses of "AMS" and/or synonymous terms, no clear etiology of encephalopathy, and had undergone both LP and bMRI.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the frequency of abnormal diagnostic testing results determined objectively for LP using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings and subjectively for bMRI through team agreement on imaging findings deemed significant through retrospective chart review. We subjectively determined the frequency of therapeutic efficacy. Finally, we analyzed the effect of other clinical variables on the likelihood of discovering abnormal CSF and bMRI findings through chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression.

Results: One hundred four patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty patients (48.1%) had an abnormal CSF profile or definitive microbiological or cytological data by LP, 44 patients (42.3%) had bMRI with significant abnormal findings, and 74 patients (71.2%) had abnormal results on at least one of these investigations. Few clinical variables were associated with the abnormal findings in either investigation. We judged 24.0% (25/104) of bMRI and 26.0% (27/104) of LPs to have therapeutic efficacy with moderate interobserver reliability.

Conclusions: Determining when to perform combined LP and bMRI in ICU patients with unexplained acute encephalopathy must rely on clinical judgment. These investigations have a reasonable yield in this selected population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腰椎穿刺联合脑MRI对不明原因急性脑病危重患者的诊断率:一项回顾性队列研究
危重患者经常经历急性脑病,通常通俗地称为“精神状态改变”(AMS);然而,对于不明原因脑病的ICU内科患者进行腰椎穿刺(LP)和高级神经影像学检查尚无一致的指南或标准。目的:我们试图通过异常结果的频率和这些检查的治疗效果(即结果改变治疗的频率)来确定LP和脑MRI (bMRI)联合检查在这类患者中的效果。设计环境和参与者:回顾性队列研究,纳入2012年至2018年期间在某三级学术中心住院的ICU内科患者,这些患者的诊断为“AMS”和/或同义术语,没有明确的脑病病因,并接受了LP和bMRI检查。主要结果和测量方法:主要结果是通过脑脊液(CSF)检查客观确定LP异常诊断测试结果的频率,通过回顾性图表回顾,通过团队对显像结果达成一致,主观确定bMRI异常诊断测试结果的频率。主观判断疗效的频率。最后,我们通过卡方检验和多变量logistic回归分析了其他临床变量对发现脑脊液异常和bMRI结果的可能性的影响。结果:104例患者符合纳入标准。50例患者(48.1%)有脑脊液谱异常或LP确定的微生物学或细胞学数据异常,44例患者(42.3%)有明显异常的bMRI结果,74例患者(71.2%)在这些检查中至少有一项结果异常。在两项调查中,很少有临床变量与异常结果相关。我们判断24.0%(25/104)的bMRI和26.0%(27/104)的LPs具有治疗效果,观察者间信度中等。结论:ICU不明原因急性脑病患者何时行LP和bMRI联合检查必须依靠临床判断。这些调查在选定的人群中有合理的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信