Successful restoration of checkpoint inhibitors efficacy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for classic Hodgkin lymphoma patients

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Riad El Fakih, Abdulwahab A. Albabtain, Saud Alhayli, Khawlah Farhan, Walid Rasheed, Alfadel Alshaibani, Naeem Chaudhri, Mahmoud Aljurf
{"title":"Successful restoration of checkpoint inhibitors efficacy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for classic Hodgkin lymphoma patients","authors":"Riad El Fakih,&nbsp;Abdulwahab A. Albabtain,&nbsp;Saud Alhayli,&nbsp;Khawlah Farhan,&nbsp;Walid Rasheed,&nbsp;Alfadel Alshaibani,&nbsp;Naeem Chaudhri,&nbsp;Mahmoud Aljurf","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Classic Hodgkin lymphoma<span> (cHL) is a highly-curable disease. However, relapses after bone marrow transplant are challenging especially relapses after allogeneic transplant.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective chart review of the institution transplant database to summarize the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) use for cHL relapses postallo-HCT in patients who already failed to derive sustained benefit from CPIs received prior to allo-HCT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six cases were identified and reviewed. All patients received and failed to derive sustained benefit from CPIs and brentuximab vedotin<span> preallo-HCT. The median age at the time of allo-HCT was 28.6 years (IQR 23.6–34.2), the median number of lines received prior to allo-HCT was 6.5 (range 5–9). The median duration of CPI therapy prior to allo-HCT was 8.1 months (IQR 6.7–12.9). The median time between the discontinuation of CPI and allo-HCT was 5.78 months (IQR 3.15–15.8). The median time to progression postallo-HCT was 5.75 months (IQR 2.6–11.7). The median time between allo-HCT and re-challenge with a CPI was 7.6 months (IQR 3.2–28.6). The median time of follow up after starting postallo-HCT CPIs was 16 months (IQR 7.25–25.75). Five out six patients responded and two patients developed GvHD.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our report shows preserved efficacy without any new safety signals by using CPIs postallo-HCT despite using and having failed to derive sustained benefit from CPIs preallo-HCT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":"50 3","pages":"Pages 76-85"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775423000556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a highly-curable disease. However, relapses after bone marrow transplant are challenging especially relapses after allogeneic transplant.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of the institution transplant database to summarize the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) use for cHL relapses postallo-HCT in patients who already failed to derive sustained benefit from CPIs received prior to allo-HCT.

Results

Six cases were identified and reviewed. All patients received and failed to derive sustained benefit from CPIs and brentuximab vedotin preallo-HCT. The median age at the time of allo-HCT was 28.6 years (IQR 23.6–34.2), the median number of lines received prior to allo-HCT was 6.5 (range 5–9). The median duration of CPI therapy prior to allo-HCT was 8.1 months (IQR 6.7–12.9). The median time between the discontinuation of CPI and allo-HCT was 5.78 months (IQR 3.15–15.8). The median time to progression postallo-HCT was 5.75 months (IQR 2.6–11.7). The median time between allo-HCT and re-challenge with a CPI was 7.6 months (IQR 3.2–28.6). The median time of follow up after starting postallo-HCT CPIs was 16 months (IQR 7.25–25.75). Five out six patients responded and two patients developed GvHD.

Conclusion

Our report shows preserved efficacy without any new safety signals by using CPIs postallo-HCT despite using and having failed to derive sustained benefit from CPIs preallo-HCT.

经典霍奇金淋巴瘤患者异基因造血细胞移植后检查点抑制剂疗效的成功恢复。
背景:经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)是一种高度可治愈的疾病。然而,骨髓移植后复发具有挑战性,尤其是异基因移植后复发。方法:对机构移植数据库进行回顾性图表审查,总结检查点抑制剂(CPIs)用于allo-HCT后cHL复发的患者的安全性和有效性,这些患者在allo-HCT前接受的检查点抑制剂已无法获得持续的益处。结果:确定并审查了6例病例。所有患者均接受并未能从CPIs和布伦妥昔单抗-韦多汀-preallo HCT中获得持续获益。allo-HCT时的中位年龄为28.6岁(IQR 23.6-34.2),allo-HCT前接受的中位品系数为6.5(范围5-9)。在allo-HCT之前,CPI治疗的中位持续时间为8.1个月(IQR 6.7-12.9)。停止CPI和allo-HCT之间的中位时间为5.78个月(IQ 3.15-15.8术后HCT的CPIs为16个月(IQR 7.25-25.75)。六名患者中有五名有反应,两名患者出现GvHD。结论:我们的报告显示,尽管使用了CPIs,但未能从CPIs获得持续的益处,但使用CPIs后HCT仍保持疗效,没有任何新的安全信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信