Low Posterior Internal Jugular Vein Approach for Tunnelled Haemodialysis Catheter Insertion: A Report on Outcomes at a Single Centre.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-27 DOI:10.1177/15385744231196651
Julian Yaxley, Ryan Gately, Shaun Davidson-West, Catherine Wilkinson, Murty Mantha
{"title":"Low Posterior Internal Jugular Vein Approach for Tunnelled Haemodialysis Catheter Insertion: A Report on Outcomes at a Single Centre.","authors":"Julian Yaxley, Ryan Gately, Shaun Davidson-West, Catherine Wilkinson, Murty Mantha","doi":"10.1177/15385744231196651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The impact of technical differences in cannulation technique for tunnelled haemodialysis catheter insertion is undetermined. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes of the low posterior approach for internal jugular vein tunnelled catheter placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective audit was undertaken on consecutive tunnelled catheter procedures performed at a single centre between January 2016 and June 2022. Only catheters specifically placed with a low posterior internal jugular approach were included. The study's primary outcome was 12-month catheter survival, evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test. Secondary outcomes included catheter performance and procedure-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 391 tunnelled internal jugular haemodialysis catheters were inserted in 272 patients using the low posterior technique. The 12-month primary patency rate was 68%. Catheter insertion was successful in 96% of cases. Peri-procedural complications occurred in 4% of cases, most frequently bleeding. The most common reasons for catheter loss were dysfunction (10%) and bacteraemia (6%). The best predictors of catheter failure were advanced age (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04) and in-centre dialysis treatment locality (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.19-3.45).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The low posterior approach for internal jugular vein tunnelled catheter insertion is effective and safe. We demonstrated a 12-month catheter survival rate of 68%. Further research comparing the low posterior approach with other internal jugular vein cannulation techniques is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23530,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744231196651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The impact of technical differences in cannulation technique for tunnelled haemodialysis catheter insertion is undetermined. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes of the low posterior approach for internal jugular vein tunnelled catheter placement.

Methods: A retrospective audit was undertaken on consecutive tunnelled catheter procedures performed at a single centre between January 2016 and June 2022. Only catheters specifically placed with a low posterior internal jugular approach were included. The study's primary outcome was 12-month catheter survival, evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test. Secondary outcomes included catheter performance and procedure-related complications.

Results: During the study period, 391 tunnelled internal jugular haemodialysis catheters were inserted in 272 patients using the low posterior technique. The 12-month primary patency rate was 68%. Catheter insertion was successful in 96% of cases. Peri-procedural complications occurred in 4% of cases, most frequently bleeding. The most common reasons for catheter loss were dysfunction (10%) and bacteraemia (6%). The best predictors of catheter failure were advanced age (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04) and in-centre dialysis treatment locality (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.19-3.45).

Conclusion: The low posterior approach for internal jugular vein tunnelled catheter insertion is effective and safe. We demonstrated a 12-month catheter survival rate of 68%. Further research comparing the low posterior approach with other internal jugular vein cannulation techniques is warranted.

采用低位颈内静脉后入路插入隧道式血液透析导管:单个中心的成果报告。
目的:隧道式血液透析导管插入技术差异的影响尚未确定。我们旨在评估颈内静脉穿刺导管置入低位后入路的临床效果:我们对 2016 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在一个中心进行的连续穿刺导管手术进行了回顾性审核。仅纳入了采用低位颈内静脉后入路置入的导管。研究的主要结果是 12 个月的导管存活率,采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线和对数秩检验进行评估。次要结果包括导管性能和手术相关并发症:研究期间,采用低位后置技术为 272 名患者置入了 391 根颈内穿刺血液透析导管。12 个月的初次通畅率为 68%。导管插入成功率为 96%。4%的病例出现了手术前并发症,最常见的是出血。导管脱落的最常见原因是功能障碍(10%)和菌血症(6%)。高龄(HR 1.02,95% CI 1.00-1.04)和中心内透析治疗地点(HR 2.04,95% CI 1.19-3.45)是导管失效的最佳预测因素:结论:颈内静脉隧道导管插入的低位后入路有效且安全。结论:颈内静脉隧道导管插入的低位后入法是有效和安全的,我们证明了 12 个月的导管存活率为 68%。有必要对低位后入路与其他颈内静脉插管技术进行进一步研究比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery SURGERY-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
132
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (VES) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes information to guide vascular specialists in endovascular, surgical, and medical treatment of vascular disease. VES contains original scientific articles on vascular intervention, including new endovascular therapies for peripheral artery, aneurysm, carotid, and venous conditions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信