MRI-based cephalometrics: a scoping review of current insights and future perspectives.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dento maxillo facial radiology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20230024
Karthik Sennimalai, Madhanraj Selvaraj, Om Prakash Kharbanda, Devasenathipathy Kandasamy, Kaja Mohaideen
{"title":"MRI-based cephalometrics: a scoping review of current insights and future perspectives.","authors":"Karthik Sennimalai, Madhanraj Selvaraj, Om Prakash Kharbanda, Devasenathipathy Kandasamy, Kaja Mohaideen","doi":"10.1259/dmfr.20230024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to explore the current status of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a cephalometric tool, summarize the equipment design and methods, and propose recommendations for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases, including PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, LILACS, and Cochrane Library, using broad search terms. The articles published in any language till June 2022 were considered. Cephalometric studies conducted using the MRI dataset on human participants, phantom or cadaver were included. Two independent reviewers assessed the final eligible articles using the quality assessment score (QAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were included in the final assessment. Studies used various methods, including 1.5 T or 3 T MRI systems and 3D or 2D MRI datasets. Among the imaging sequences, <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>-weighted, <i>T</i><sub>2</sub>-weighted and black bone MR images were used for cephalometric analysis. In addition, the reference standards varied among studies, such as traditional 2D cephalogram, cone-beam CT and phantom measurements. The mean QAS of all the included studies was 79% (± 14.4%). The main limitation of most studies was the small sample size and the heterogeneity of the methods, statistical tools used, and metric outcomes assessed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the heterogeneity and lack of metrological evidence on the effectiveness of MRI-based cephalometric analysis, the preliminary results demonstrated by <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> studies are encouraging. However, future studies exploring MRI sequences specific to cephalometric diagnosis are required for wider adoption of this technique in routine orthodontic practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This review aims to explore the current status of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a cephalometric tool, summarize the equipment design and methods, and propose recommendations for future research.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases, including PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, LILACS, and Cochrane Library, using broad search terms. The articles published in any language till June 2022 were considered. Cephalometric studies conducted using the MRI dataset on human participants, phantom or cadaver were included. Two independent reviewers assessed the final eligible articles using the quality assessment score (QAS).

Results: Nine studies were included in the final assessment. Studies used various methods, including 1.5 T or 3 T MRI systems and 3D or 2D MRI datasets. Among the imaging sequences, T1-weighted, T2-weighted and black bone MR images were used for cephalometric analysis. In addition, the reference standards varied among studies, such as traditional 2D cephalogram, cone-beam CT and phantom measurements. The mean QAS of all the included studies was 79% (± 14.4%). The main limitation of most studies was the small sample size and the heterogeneity of the methods, statistical tools used, and metric outcomes assessed.

Conclusions: Despite the heterogeneity and lack of metrological evidence on the effectiveness of MRI-based cephalometric analysis, the preliminary results demonstrated by in vivo and in vitro studies are encouraging. However, future studies exploring MRI sequences specific to cephalometric diagnosis are required for wider adoption of this technique in routine orthodontic practice.

基于核磁共振成像的头颅测量学:当前见解和未来展望的范围综述。
目的:本综述旨在探讨磁共振成像(MRI)作为头颅测量工具的现状:本综述旨在探讨磁共振成像(MRI)作为头颅测量工具的现状,总结设备设计和方法,并对未来研究提出建议:使用广泛的检索词在电子数据库中进行了系统检索,包括 PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science、EBSCOhost、LILACS 和 Cochrane Library。截至 2022 年 6 月以任何语言发表的文章均在考虑之列。使用磁共振成像数据集对人类参与者、模型或尸体进行的头颅测量研究均被纳入。两位独立审稿人使用质量评估分数(QAS)对最终符合条件的文章进行评估:最终评估纳入了九项研究。研究采用了多种方法,包括 1.5 T 或 3 T MRI 系统以及三维或二维 MRI 数据集。在成像序列中,T1 加权、T2 加权和黑骨磁共振图像被用于头颅测量分析。此外,不同研究的参考标准也不尽相同,如传统的二维头影、锥束 CT 和模型测量。所有纳入研究的平均 QAS 为 79%(± 14.4%)。大多数研究的主要局限性在于样本量较小,以及所用方法、统计工具和评估指标结果的异质性:尽管基于 MRI 的头颅测量分析的有效性存在异质性且缺乏计量学证据,但体内和体外研究显示的初步结果令人鼓舞。然而,要想在常规正畸实践中更广泛地采用这种技术,还需要在未来的研究中探索专门用于头颅测量诊断的核磁共振成像序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信