Neuroprotective Strategies for Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review.

Q3 Medicine
Brigitta Marcia Budihardja, Erika Anggraini, Rianti Wulandari Pratiwi, Anya Dewi Nastiti, Syntia Nusanti
{"title":"Neuroprotective Strategies for Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Brigitta Marcia Budihardja,&nbsp;Erika Anggraini,&nbsp;Rianti Wulandari Pratiwi,&nbsp;Anya Dewi Nastiti,&nbsp;Syntia Nusanti","doi":"10.3341/kjo.2022.0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) is the second most common form of optic neuropathy. Most patients show no improvement over time. Until now, there is still no definitive therapy for NAION. The available literatures on the possible treatment of NAION are quite diverse and controversial. Neuroprotection strategies have been suggested as one of the potential treatments for NAION. This review aims to critically evaluate the literature on neuroprotective strategy for NAION.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This report was written in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We performed a systematic literature search in Pubmed, Science Direct, Proquest, and Cochrane databases. Only neuroprotective agents that directly work in protecting neurons were included. The outcome of interest in this review is retinal ganglion cell density and apoptosis for animal studies and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for human studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic search identified 591 studies of which 24 met the eligibility criteria, including 21 animal studies and three human studies. Only a few of the studies evaluated the same treatments, showing how diverse neuroprotector treatments are currently being evaluated as NAION treatment. From 21 animal studies, 14 studies showed significantly higher retinal ganglion cell density (1.49- to 2.81-fold) with neuroprotective treatment compared to control group. Two of three human studies in this review had also found a beneficial effect of preserving retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in NAION patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review suggests the potential of neuroprotection as a viable option in the quest for an effective treatment strategy for NAION. Further studies, particularly clinical studies, are necessary to establish its efficacy in NAION patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17883,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO","volume":"37 4","pages":"328-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/dc/kjo-2022-0166.PMC10427903.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2022.0166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) is the second most common form of optic neuropathy. Most patients show no improvement over time. Until now, there is still no definitive therapy for NAION. The available literatures on the possible treatment of NAION are quite diverse and controversial. Neuroprotection strategies have been suggested as one of the potential treatments for NAION. This review aims to critically evaluate the literature on neuroprotective strategy for NAION.

Methods: This report was written in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We performed a systematic literature search in Pubmed, Science Direct, Proquest, and Cochrane databases. Only neuroprotective agents that directly work in protecting neurons were included. The outcome of interest in this review is retinal ganglion cell density and apoptosis for animal studies and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for human studies.

Results: The systematic search identified 591 studies of which 24 met the eligibility criteria, including 21 animal studies and three human studies. Only a few of the studies evaluated the same treatments, showing how diverse neuroprotector treatments are currently being evaluated as NAION treatment. From 21 animal studies, 14 studies showed significantly higher retinal ganglion cell density (1.49- to 2.81-fold) with neuroprotective treatment compared to control group. Two of three human studies in this review had also found a beneficial effect of preserving retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in NAION patients.

Conclusions: This review suggests the potential of neuroprotection as a viable option in the quest for an effective treatment strategy for NAION. Further studies, particularly clinical studies, are necessary to establish its efficacy in NAION patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

非动脉性前缺血性视神经病变的神经保护策略:系统综述。
目的:非动脉性前部缺血性视神经病变(NAION)是第二常见的视神经病变。随着时间的推移,大多数患者没有任何改善。到目前为止,对于NAION仍然没有明确的治疗方法。现有的文献对NAION可能的治疗方法是相当多样化和有争议的。神经保护策略已被认为是NAION的潜在治疗方法之一。这篇综述旨在批判性地评价关于NAION神经保护策略的文献。方法:本报告按照PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南撰写。我们在Pubmed、Science Direct、Proquest和Cochrane数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。只包括直接保护神经元的神经保护剂。本综述主要关注动物实验中视网膜神经节细胞密度和凋亡的变化,以及人实验中视网膜神经纤维层厚度的变化。结果:系统检索确定了591项研究,其中24项符合入选标准,包括21项动物研究和3项人体研究。只有少数研究评估了相同的治疗方法,这表明目前有多种神经保护剂治疗被评估为NAION治疗。在21项动物研究中,14项研究显示,与对照组相比,神经保护治疗组的视网膜神经节细胞密度显著提高(1.49至2.81倍)。在本综述中,三分之二的人体研究也发现了保留NAION患者视网膜神经纤维层厚度的有益效果。结论:本综述提示神经保护的潜力是寻求NAION有效治疗策略的可行选择。需要进一步的研究,特别是临床研究来确定其对NAION患者的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信