Impact of Postsurgical Opioid Prescription Reduction in General Surgery Patients.

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hospital Pharmacy Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-27 DOI:10.1177/00185787221150924
Matt Baker, Derick Miranda, Gage Dixon, Madeline Salsman, Mangesh D Oza
{"title":"Impact of Postsurgical Opioid Prescription Reduction in General Surgery Patients.","authors":"Matt Baker, Derick Miranda, Gage Dixon, Madeline Salsman, Mangesh D Oza","doi":"10.1177/00185787221150924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Recent studies suggest a large percentage of post-surgical opioid prescriptions are not utilized. This surplus of opioids provides supply for diversion or entry into the waste cycle. Recommendations are available for general surgery procedures which may optimize prescribed quantity while maintaining patient satisfaction which this work was initiated to investigate. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective patient survey was conducted with Institutional Review Committee approval following adjustments to discharge opioid prescription quantities in an individual General Surgeon practice. Patients were contacted via phone to assess the impact of the reduced opioid quantities. Patients were categorized based on whether they utilized the entire prescription or opioid remained. Data collected include baseline demographics, inpatient stay characteristics, opioid use patterns, and satisfaction with overall pain control. The primary endpoint was to determine if patients were satisfied with their pain control based on response. Secondary endpoints included if patient characteristics could be identified that signal larger opioid quantity use, and whether unused opioids were disposed. <b>Results:</b> Thirty patients utilized all opioid prescribed, 60 had some quantity remaining. Baseline data appear similar aside from age with younger patients using more opioid. Patients were satisfied with their overall pain control in 93% of respondents. A total of 960 opioid tablets (11.4 ± 4.8 tabs/patient) were not prescribed, 8% required refill. Opioid disposal yet to occur in 85% of patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> An evidence-based reduction in opioid discharge prescriptions following general surgery procedures resulted in nearly 1000 opioid tablets not being dispensed without having a negative impact on patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787221150924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Recent studies suggest a large percentage of post-surgical opioid prescriptions are not utilized. This surplus of opioids provides supply for diversion or entry into the waste cycle. Recommendations are available for general surgery procedures which may optimize prescribed quantity while maintaining patient satisfaction which this work was initiated to investigate. Methods: This retrospective patient survey was conducted with Institutional Review Committee approval following adjustments to discharge opioid prescription quantities in an individual General Surgeon practice. Patients were contacted via phone to assess the impact of the reduced opioid quantities. Patients were categorized based on whether they utilized the entire prescription or opioid remained. Data collected include baseline demographics, inpatient stay characteristics, opioid use patterns, and satisfaction with overall pain control. The primary endpoint was to determine if patients were satisfied with their pain control based on response. Secondary endpoints included if patient characteristics could be identified that signal larger opioid quantity use, and whether unused opioids were disposed. Results: Thirty patients utilized all opioid prescribed, 60 had some quantity remaining. Baseline data appear similar aside from age with younger patients using more opioid. Patients were satisfied with their overall pain control in 93% of respondents. A total of 960 opioid tablets (11.4 ± 4.8 tabs/patient) were not prescribed, 8% required refill. Opioid disposal yet to occur in 85% of patients. Conclusion: An evidence-based reduction in opioid discharge prescriptions following general surgery procedures resulted in nearly 1000 opioid tablets not being dispensed without having a negative impact on patient satisfaction.

减少普通外科患者术后阿片类药物处方的影响。
目的最近的研究表明,手术后阿片类药物处方中有很大一部分没有被使用。过剩的阿片类药物为转用或进入废物循环提供了供应。针对普外科手术提出了一些建议,以优化处方量,同时保持患者满意度。方法:在一名普外科医生调整出院阿片类药物处方量后,经机构审查委员会批准,开展了这项回顾性患者调查。我们通过电话与患者取得联系,以评估减少阿片类药物用量的影响。根据患者是否使用了全部处方或剩余的阿片类药物对其进行分类。收集的数据包括基线人口统计学、住院患者特征、阿片类药物使用模式以及对总体疼痛控制的满意度。主要终点是根据反应确定患者对疼痛控制是否满意。次要终点包括:是否能确定表明阿片类药物使用量较大的患者特征,以及是否对未使用的阿片类药物进行了处理。结果:30 名患者用完了处方中的所有阿片类药物,60 名患者仍有部分剩余。除年龄外,基线数据相似,年轻患者使用的阿片类药物更多。93%的受访患者对总体疼痛控制情况表示满意。共有 960 片阿片类药物(11.4 ± 4.8 片/患者)未开处方,8% 的患者需要重新配药。85%的患者尚未处理阿片类药物。结论以证据为基础减少普外科手术后阿片类药物的出院处方,导致近 1000 片阿片类药物未被配发,且未对患者满意度产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信