A Resident-driven Quality Improvement Project to Increase Primary Care Follow-up after Congestive Heart Failure Exacerbation: Use of a Quality and Safety Award.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lea M Monday, Joseph Sebastian, Paul Nguyen, Omid Yazdanpanah, Caleb Solokowski, Jane Chi, Kareem Bazzy
{"title":"A Resident-driven Quality Improvement Project to Increase Primary Care Follow-up after Congestive Heart Failure Exacerbation: Use of a Quality and Safety Award.","authors":"Lea M Monday,&nbsp;Joseph Sebastian,&nbsp;Paul Nguyen,&nbsp;Omid Yazdanpanah,&nbsp;Caleb Solokowski,&nbsp;Jane Chi,&nbsp;Kareem Bazzy","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Congestive heart failure (CHF) is the most common cause of 30-day inpatient readmission. Studies have found that early follow-up with primary care physicians (PCP) within 7 days of discharge may improve 30-day readmission rates; however, many have used a multidisciplinary discharge coordination team, which is not a resource at all centers. Here, the authors present a resident-driven quality improvement initiative using a monthly quality and safety award to increase early PCP follow-up for veterans discharged following admissions due to a CHF exacerbation. Primary outcomes were percentage of PCP follow-up within 7 days and median time to PCP follow-up. Secondary outcomes included percentage of patients attending a PCP visit within 7 days, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prepost quasi-experimental cohort study evaluated 3 concurrent quality improvement interventions to increase PCP follow-up after CHF exacerbation. Process maps and Ishikawa diagrams examined the discharge process. Interventions included a standardized discharge scheduling order, monthly education on the process, and monthly aggregated performance feedback for each medical resident. A patient safety and quality award was given to the team with the highest rate of PCP appointments scheduled within 7 days. Patient characteristics and outcomes were gathered for a 6-month historic period and 6-month intervention period. Test of proportions and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test were used to compare groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 294 patients were discharged (161 in historic group and 133 in intervention group). Appointments scheduled within 7 days of discharge increased from 43% to 79% ( P < 0.001). Median time to PCP follow-up decreased from 8 to 6 days ( P < 0.001). Patients who completed (showed up to) a PCP appointment within 7 days increased from 16% to 41% ( P < 0.001). There was no impact on 30-day readmission or mortality; however, the number of study subjects was too small to rule out an effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A standardized discharge scheduling order, more robust resident education, and a monthly patient safety and quality award resulted in a significant increase in the rate of primary care follow-up within 7 days of CHF exacerbation.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is the most common cause of 30-day inpatient readmission. Studies have found that early follow-up with primary care physicians (PCP) within 7 days of discharge may improve 30-day readmission rates; however, many have used a multidisciplinary discharge coordination team, which is not a resource at all centers. Here, the authors present a resident-driven quality improvement initiative using a monthly quality and safety award to increase early PCP follow-up for veterans discharged following admissions due to a CHF exacerbation. Primary outcomes were percentage of PCP follow-up within 7 days and median time to PCP follow-up. Secondary outcomes included percentage of patients attending a PCP visit within 7 days, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality.

Methods: This prepost quasi-experimental cohort study evaluated 3 concurrent quality improvement interventions to increase PCP follow-up after CHF exacerbation. Process maps and Ishikawa diagrams examined the discharge process. Interventions included a standardized discharge scheduling order, monthly education on the process, and monthly aggregated performance feedback for each medical resident. A patient safety and quality award was given to the team with the highest rate of PCP appointments scheduled within 7 days. Patient characteristics and outcomes were gathered for a 6-month historic period and 6-month intervention period. Test of proportions and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test were used to compare groups.

Results: A total of 294 patients were discharged (161 in historic group and 133 in intervention group). Appointments scheduled within 7 days of discharge increased from 43% to 79% ( P < 0.001). Median time to PCP follow-up decreased from 8 to 6 days ( P < 0.001). Patients who completed (showed up to) a PCP appointment within 7 days increased from 16% to 41% ( P < 0.001). There was no impact on 30-day readmission or mortality; however, the number of study subjects was too small to rule out an effect.

Conclusions: A standardized discharge scheduling order, more robust resident education, and a monthly patient safety and quality award resulted in a significant increase in the rate of primary care follow-up within 7 days of CHF exacerbation.

一个由居民驱动的质量改进项目,以增加充血性心力衰竭加重后的初级保健随访:使用质量和安全奖。
目的:充血性心力衰竭(CHF)是30天住院患者再入院的最常见原因。研究发现,出院后7天内与初级保健医生(PCP)的早期随访可以提高30天的再入院率;然而,许多医院采用了多学科出院协调小组,这并不是所有中心都具备的资源。在这里,作者提出了一项居民驱动的质量改进倡议,使用每月质量和安全奖来增加因CHF恶化而入院出院的退伍军人的早期PCP随访。主要结局是7天内PCP随访的百分比和到PCP随访的中位时间。次要结局包括7天内就诊PCP的患者百分比、30天再入院率和30天死亡率。方法:这项准实验前队列研究评估了3种同时进行的质量改善干预措施,以增加CHF加重后的PCP随访。过程图和石川图检查了排放过程。干预措施包括标准化的出院排期单,每月对流程进行教育,以及每月对每位住院医师进行汇总绩效反馈。7天内PCP预约率最高的团队获得了患者安全和质量奖。收集6个月的历史期和6个月的干预期的患者特征和结果。组间比较采用比例检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验。结果:共出院294例(历史组161例,干预组133例)。出院7天内安排的预约从43%增加到79% (P < 0.001)。到PCP随访的中位时间从8天减少到6天(P < 0.001)。7天内完成(出现)PCP预约的患者从16%增加到41% (P < 0.001)。对30天再入院或死亡率没有影响;然而,研究对象的数量太少,不能排除影响。结论:标准化的出院时间表、更健全的住院医师教育和每月一次的患者安全和质量奖励导致CHF加重后7天内初级保健随访率显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信