Varnish with S-PRG filler reduces dentin permeability after erosive/abrasive challenge.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2023-08-01
Rafael Nde S Machado, Cecilia P Turssi, Fabiana Mg França, Flávia LBdo Amaral, Thomas Attin, Roberta T Basting
{"title":"Varnish with S-PRG filler reduces dentin permeability after erosive/abrasive challenge.","authors":"Rafael Nde S Machado, Cecilia P Turssi, Fabiana Mg França, Flávia LBdo Amaral, Thomas Attin, Roberta T Basting","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of different varnishes on dentin permeability to erosive/abrasive challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>60 superficial dentin discs were randomly allocated to six groups (n=10): Duraphat, PRG Barrier Coat, Clinpro XT, Profluorid, Fluor Protector S and untreated (control). Permeability tests were carried out: after acid conditioning, after treatment, and after abrasive/erosive challenges. The abrasive-erosive challenges were performed for 5 days (citric acid and in remineralizing saliva), as well as abrasion with toothpaste slurry (Colgate Total 12). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained of the dentin surfaces (5,000x) after the treatments, and after the erosive/abrasive challenges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests showed that all the varnishes promoted a decrease in dentin permeability directly after application, with Clinpro XT showing the highest percentage (69.52%) of dentin sealing (P= 0.0188). After the erosive/abrasive challenge, only PRG Barrier Coat varnish showed dentin sealing ability with reduced dentin permeability (42.16%) (P= 0.0014). However, none of the applied varnishes promoted a statistically significant difference in the percentage of dentin sealing, compared with the control group (P> 0.05). Clinpro XT showed a higher percentage of dentin sealing, while only PRG Barrier Coat showed reduced dentin permeability after the erosive/abrasive challenge.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Varnish containing S-PRG filler has the efficacy needed to be used as a coating material to reduce dentin permeability in situations of erosive/abrasive challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"36 4","pages":"193-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different varnishes on dentin permeability to erosive/abrasive challenges.

Methods: 60 superficial dentin discs were randomly allocated to six groups (n=10): Duraphat, PRG Barrier Coat, Clinpro XT, Profluorid, Fluor Protector S and untreated (control). Permeability tests were carried out: after acid conditioning, after treatment, and after abrasive/erosive challenges. The abrasive-erosive challenges were performed for 5 days (citric acid and in remineralizing saliva), as well as abrasion with toothpaste slurry (Colgate Total 12). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained of the dentin surfaces (5,000x) after the treatments, and after the erosive/abrasive challenges.

Results: Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests showed that all the varnishes promoted a decrease in dentin permeability directly after application, with Clinpro XT showing the highest percentage (69.52%) of dentin sealing (P= 0.0188). After the erosive/abrasive challenge, only PRG Barrier Coat varnish showed dentin sealing ability with reduced dentin permeability (42.16%) (P= 0.0014). However, none of the applied varnishes promoted a statistically significant difference in the percentage of dentin sealing, compared with the control group (P> 0.05). Clinpro XT showed a higher percentage of dentin sealing, while only PRG Barrier Coat showed reduced dentin permeability after the erosive/abrasive challenge.

Clinical significance: Varnish containing S-PRG filler has the efficacy needed to be used as a coating material to reduce dentin permeability in situations of erosive/abrasive challenges.

含有 S-PRG 填充剂的清漆可降低腐蚀/磨蚀挑战后的牙本质渗透性。
目的:评估不同清漆对牙本质对侵蚀性/磨蚀性挑战的渗透性的影响。方法:将 60 个浅层牙本质盘随机分配到六个组(n=10):Duraphat、PRG Barrier Coat、Clinpro XT、Profluorid、Fluor Protector S 和未处理组(对照组)。渗透性测试分别在酸调节后、处理后和磨损/侵蚀挑战后进行。磨蚀性测试持续了 5 天(柠檬酸和再矿化唾液),以及牙膏浆(高露洁全效 12)的磨蚀。在治疗后和侵蚀性/研磨性挑战后,对牙本质表面进行了扫描电子显微镜(SEM)成像(5,000 倍):Kruskal-Wallis 和 Dunn 检验表明,所有上光剂在使用后都能直接降低牙本质的渗透性,其中 Clinpro XT 的牙本质封闭率最高(69.52%)(P= 0.0188)。经过侵蚀/磨蚀挑战后,只有 PRG 阻隔涂料显示出牙本质封闭能力,降低了牙本质渗透性(42.16%)(P= 0.0014)。不过,与对照组相比,没有任何一种上光剂能使牙本质封闭的百分比有显著的统计学差异(P> 0.05)。Clinpro XT 表现出更高的牙本质封闭率,而只有 PRG 阻隔涂料在腐蚀/磨蚀挑战后表现出更低的牙本质渗透性:临床意义:含有 S-PRG 填充剂的清漆具有必要的功效,可用作涂层材料,在受到侵蚀/磨损挑战时降低牙本质的渗透性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信