Evaluating Approaches to Linking Evictions Records:: Assessing the Feasibility of Research with Integrated Data.

Delaware journal of public health Pub Date : 2023-06-12 eCollection Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.32481/djph.2023.06.006
J J Cutuli, Mary Joan McDuffie, Erin Nescott
{"title":"Evaluating Approaches to Linking Evictions Records:: Assessing the Feasibility of Research with Integrated Data.","authors":"J J Cutuli, Mary Joan McDuffie, Erin Nescott","doi":"10.32481/djph.2023.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates different approaches to integrating evictions data with Medicaid and homeless shelter utilization records at the individual level for the state of Delaware. We especially focus on evaluating the feasibility of creating an integrated dataset focused on children and adolescents through different approaches to matching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We attempt to link existing statewide records on evictions, Medicaid, and shelter from 2017-2019. We first compare direct match and probabilistic match approaches to linking evictions and Medicaid records, and then incorporate shelter records. Finally, we consider a limited set of characteristics relevant to potential future public health research among children who experienced eviction, had a shelter stay, and were enrolled in Medicaid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Direct matching resulted in a lower match (14%) rate than probabilistic matching (22%) of eviction records to Medicaid data. Homeless shelter records had a high match rate to Medicaid records, even when using a direct match (75%). A sizeable subset of children (n=216) were linked across the three data sources, though this was from a small percentage of cases in the evictions data. Among this subset of children, most (71%) were enrolled in Medicaid in all three years considered by this study and Black children were greatly overrepresented (75%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating evictions records with other health and human service data involves a number of challenges. Probabilistic matching yielded a considerably higher number of matches after manual review, resulting in a possible study sample of children who have experienced eviction, a homeless shelter stay, and were enrolled in Medicaid. Strategies to increase the match rate for eviction records through using records from other, more universal services may be necessary for investigations that require more comprehensive coverage of the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":72774,"journal":{"name":"Delaware journal of public health","volume":"9 2","pages":"24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/db/47/djph-92-006.PMC10445597.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delaware journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32481/djph.2023.06.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigates different approaches to integrating evictions data with Medicaid and homeless shelter utilization records at the individual level for the state of Delaware. We especially focus on evaluating the feasibility of creating an integrated dataset focused on children and adolescents through different approaches to matching.

Methods: We attempt to link existing statewide records on evictions, Medicaid, and shelter from 2017-2019. We first compare direct match and probabilistic match approaches to linking evictions and Medicaid records, and then incorporate shelter records. Finally, we consider a limited set of characteristics relevant to potential future public health research among children who experienced eviction, had a shelter stay, and were enrolled in Medicaid.

Results: Direct matching resulted in a lower match (14%) rate than probabilistic matching (22%) of eviction records to Medicaid data. Homeless shelter records had a high match rate to Medicaid records, even when using a direct match (75%). A sizeable subset of children (n=216) were linked across the three data sources, though this was from a small percentage of cases in the evictions data. Among this subset of children, most (71%) were enrolled in Medicaid in all three years considered by this study and Black children were greatly overrepresented (75%).

Conclusions: Integrating evictions records with other health and human service data involves a number of challenges. Probabilistic matching yielded a considerably higher number of matches after manual review, resulting in a possible study sample of children who have experienced eviction, a homeless shelter stay, and were enrolled in Medicaid. Strategies to increase the match rate for eviction records through using records from other, more universal services may be necessary for investigations that require more comprehensive coverage of the population.

评估将驱逐记录联系起来的方法::评估利用综合数据开展研究的可行性。
研究目的:本研究调查了特拉华州在个人层面上整合驱逐数据、医疗补助和无家可归者收容所使用记录的不同方法。我们尤其侧重于评估通过不同的匹配方法创建一个以儿童和青少年为重点的综合数据集的可行性:我们试图将 2017-2019 年间现有的全州范围内的驱逐、医疗补助和庇护所记录联系起来。我们首先比较了直接匹配法和概率匹配法来连接驱逐和医疗补助记录,然后纳入庇护所记录。最后,我们考虑了经历过驱逐、在庇护所逗留过并加入了医疗补助计划(Medicaid)的儿童中与未来潜在公共卫生研究相关的有限特征集:直接匹配导致的驱逐记录与医疗补助数据的匹配率(14%)低于概率匹配(22%)。无家可归者收容所记录与医疗补助记录的匹配率很高,即使使用直接匹配(75%)也是如此。有相当一部分儿童(n=216)在三个数据源之间建立了关联,尽管这只是驱逐数据中一小部分案例。在这部分儿童中,大多数(71%)在本研究考虑的所有三年中都加入了医疗补助计划,而且黑人儿童的比例大大超过其他儿童(75%):结论:将驱逐记录与其他健康和人类服务数据进行整合涉及到许多挑战。经过人工审核后,概率匹配产生的匹配数要高得多,因此研究样本可能是经历过驱逐、在无家可归者收容所逗留过并加入了医疗补助计划的儿童。通过使用其他更普遍的服务记录来提高驱逐记录的匹配率的策略对于需要更全面覆盖人群的调查可能是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信