(IN) Access to Artificial Limbs: the Patient's Perspective According to the War Amps of Canada.

Q3 Medicine
A Petlock, K DiMario
{"title":"(IN) Access to Artificial Limbs: the Patient's Perspective According to the War Amps of Canada.","authors":"A Petlock,&nbsp;K DiMario","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.35972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Funding agencies, both public and private, do not adequately meet the needs of Canadian amputees. This often leaves amputees without access to appropriate prosthetic care due to outstanding balances that are to be paid out of pocket, or by charitable organizations. There are several factors that result in these inadequacies. As healthcare is a provincial responsibility in Canada, provinces and territories have the authority to create individual public regimes, each with their own weaknesses. In fact, there are a few provincial regimes which do not include prosthetic funding at all. Private healthcare is meant to offset the remaining balance; however, their lack of knowledge regarding amputation has resulted in the creation of policies with ambiguous language, limiting the funding available for prosthetic care. Attitudinal barriers and missed legislative opportunities further exacerbate the shortcomings of prosthetic funding provided by public and private funding agencies, requiring action.</p>","PeriodicalId":32763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","volume":"4 2","pages":"35972"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.35972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Funding agencies, both public and private, do not adequately meet the needs of Canadian amputees. This often leaves amputees without access to appropriate prosthetic care due to outstanding balances that are to be paid out of pocket, or by charitable organizations. There are several factors that result in these inadequacies. As healthcare is a provincial responsibility in Canada, provinces and territories have the authority to create individual public regimes, each with their own weaknesses. In fact, there are a few provincial regimes which do not include prosthetic funding at all. Private healthcare is meant to offset the remaining balance; however, their lack of knowledge regarding amputation has resulted in the creation of policies with ambiguous language, limiting the funding available for prosthetic care. Attitudinal barriers and missed legislative opportunities further exacerbate the shortcomings of prosthetic funding provided by public and private funding agencies, requiring action.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

(英)获得假肢:从加拿大战争医院的角度看病人的观点。
资助机构,无论是公共还是私人,都不能充分满足加拿大截肢者的需求。这往往使截肢者无法获得适当的假肢护理,因为需要自掏腰包或由慈善组织支付未偿余额。有几个因素导致了这些不足。由于加拿大的医疗保健是各省的责任,各省和地区有权建立各自的公共制度,每个制度都有自己的弱点。事实上,有一些省级政府根本不包括义肢资金。私人医疗保健旨在抵消剩余的差额;然而,由于他们缺乏对截肢的了解,导致制定了措辞含糊的政策,限制了假肢护理的资金。态度上的障碍和错失的立法机会进一步加剧了公共和私人资助机构提供的假肢资金的不足,需要采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Prosthetics  Orthotics Journal
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信