NeoTalk: Communication Skills Training for Neonatal Clinicians.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Katherine F Guttmann, Malorie Meshkati, Julia Frydman, Cardinale B Smith, Lindsay Dow, Andrea S Weintraub
{"title":"NeoTalk: Communication Skills Training for Neonatal Clinicians.","authors":"Katherine F Guttmann, Malorie Meshkati, Julia Frydman, Cardinale B Smith, Lindsay Dow, Andrea S Weintraub","doi":"10.1177/10499091231198507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite proven benefit, pediatric subspecialists often have not been offered formal serious illness communication skills training. We sought to: 1) develop and evaluate the impact of a communication skills course, based on the VitalTalk framework, on Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) clinicians; 2) evaluate provider comfort with key serious illness communication skills and frequency of use of those skills, before and after \"NeoTalk\" and; 3) explore differences and similarities between adult and pediatric serious illness communication skills courses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a NICU specific communication skills course and surveyed course participants to evaluate comfort with key communication skills before and after course participation, and frequency of use of key skills before and 2 months after our course. Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to compare participant responses across time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34 providers completed NeoTalk training. Complete pre- and post-course data was available for 29 participants. Participants reported increased comfort with skills including 'sharing difficult news' (<i>P</i> = .018), and 'responding to emotion' (<i>P</i> = .002). Participants did not report increased frequency in using target skills 2 months after training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multi-disciplinary cohort of NICU providers endorsed increased confidence in key communication skills but not increased skill application 2-months post-course completion. While a single course can successfully teach skills, additional exposure may be necessary to build new communication habits. Our experience developing NeoTalk helped elucidate some of the ways in which conversations about seriously ill infants may be different from conversations about seriously ill adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"651-657"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231198507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite proven benefit, pediatric subspecialists often have not been offered formal serious illness communication skills training. We sought to: 1) develop and evaluate the impact of a communication skills course, based on the VitalTalk framework, on Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) clinicians; 2) evaluate provider comfort with key serious illness communication skills and frequency of use of those skills, before and after "NeoTalk" and; 3) explore differences and similarities between adult and pediatric serious illness communication skills courses.

Methods: We developed a NICU specific communication skills course and surveyed course participants to evaluate comfort with key communication skills before and after course participation, and frequency of use of key skills before and 2 months after our course. Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to compare participant responses across time points.

Results: 34 providers completed NeoTalk training. Complete pre- and post-course data was available for 29 participants. Participants reported increased comfort with skills including 'sharing difficult news' (P = .018), and 'responding to emotion' (P = .002). Participants did not report increased frequency in using target skills 2 months after training.

Conclusions: A multi-disciplinary cohort of NICU providers endorsed increased confidence in key communication skills but not increased skill application 2-months post-course completion. While a single course can successfully teach skills, additional exposure may be necessary to build new communication habits. Our experience developing NeoTalk helped elucidate some of the ways in which conversations about seriously ill infants may be different from conversations about seriously ill adults.

NeoTalk:新生儿临床医生沟通技巧培训。
背景:尽管儿科亚专科医生接受正规的重病沟通技巧培训已被证明是有益的,但他们往往没有接受过这种培训。我们试图1)开发并评估基于 VitalTalk 框架的沟通技巧课程对新生儿重症监护室(NICU)临床医生的影响;2)评估 "NeoTalk "前后提供者对关键重症沟通技巧的舒适度以及使用这些技巧的频率;3)探讨成人和儿科重症沟通技巧课程之间的异同:我们开发了一个针对新生儿重症监护室的沟通技巧课程,并对课程参与者进行了调查,以评估他们在参加课程前后对关键沟通技巧的舒适度,以及在课程前后两个月内使用关键技巧的频率。我们进行了 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验,以比较不同时间点参与者的反应:结果:34 名医疗服务提供者完成了 NeoTalk 培训。有 29 名学员提供了完整的培训前后数据。参与者报告称,他们在 "分享困难消息"(P = .018)和 "回应情绪"(P = .002)等技能方面的舒适度有所提高。培训 2 个月后,参与者并未报告使用目标技能的频率增加:新生儿重症监护病房的多学科医护人员在完成课程 2 个月后,对关键沟通技能的信心有所增强,但对技能的应用却没有增加。虽然单一课程可以成功教授技能,但要培养新的沟通习惯,可能还需要更多的接触。我们开发 NeoTalk 的经验有助于阐明有关重症婴儿的对话与有关重症成人的对话的一些不同之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信