Associations of Cost Sharing With Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Burden.

Sharon Dowell, Christopher J Swearingen, Manuela Pedra-Nobre, Dianne Wollaston, Sawsan Najmey, Cynthia Lawrence Elliott, Theresa Lawrence Ford, Heather North, Robin Dore, Soha Dolatabadi, Thaila Ramanujam, Stacy Kennedy, Stephanie Ott, Ilona Jileaeva, Amina Richardson, Grace Wright, Gail S Kerr
{"title":"Associations of Cost Sharing With Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Burden.","authors":"Sharon Dowell,&nbsp;Christopher J Swearingen,&nbsp;Manuela Pedra-Nobre,&nbsp;Dianne Wollaston,&nbsp;Sawsan Najmey,&nbsp;Cynthia Lawrence Elliott,&nbsp;Theresa Lawrence Ford,&nbsp;Heather North,&nbsp;Robin Dore,&nbsp;Soha Dolatabadi,&nbsp;Thaila Ramanujam,&nbsp;Stacy Kennedy,&nbsp;Stephanie Ott,&nbsp;Ilona Jileaeva,&nbsp;Amina Richardson,&nbsp;Grace Wright,&nbsp;Gail S Kerr","doi":"10.1002/acr2.11575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the regional variation of cost sharing and associations with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease burden in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with RA from rheumatology practices in Northeast, South, and West US regions were evaluated. Sociodemographics, RA disease status, and comorbidities were collected, and Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (RDCI) score was calculated. Primary insurance types and copay for office visits (OVs) and medications were documented. Univariable pairwise differences between regions were conducted, and multivariable regression models were estimated to evaluate associations of RDCI with insurance, geographical region, and race.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 402 predominantly female, White patients with RA, most received government versus private sponsored primary insurance (40% vs. 27.9%). Disease activity and RDCI were highest for patients in the South region, where copays for OVs were more frequently more than $25. Copays for OVs and medications were less than $10 in 45% and 31.8% of observations, respectively, and more prevalent in the Northeast and West patient subsets than in the South subset. Overall, RDCI score was significantly higher for OV copays less than $10 as well as for medication copays less than $25, both independent of region or race. Additionally, RDCI was significantly lower for privately insured than Medicare individuals (RDCI -0.78, 95% CI [-0.41 to -1.15], P < 0.001) and Medicaid (RDCI -0.83, 95% CI [-0.13 to -1.54], P = 0.020), independent of region and race.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cost sharing may not facilitate optimum care for patients with RA, especially in the Southern regions. More support may be required of government insurance plans to accommodate patients with RA with a high disease burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":7084,"journal":{"name":"ACR Open Rheumatology","volume":"5 8","pages":"381-387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/21/08/ACR2-5-381.PMC10425581.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR Open Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the regional variation of cost sharing and associations with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease burden in the US.

Methods: Patients with RA from rheumatology practices in Northeast, South, and West US regions were evaluated. Sociodemographics, RA disease status, and comorbidities were collected, and Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (RDCI) score was calculated. Primary insurance types and copay for office visits (OVs) and medications were documented. Univariable pairwise differences between regions were conducted, and multivariable regression models were estimated to evaluate associations of RDCI with insurance, geographical region, and race.

Results: In a cohort of 402 predominantly female, White patients with RA, most received government versus private sponsored primary insurance (40% vs. 27.9%). Disease activity and RDCI were highest for patients in the South region, where copays for OVs were more frequently more than $25. Copays for OVs and medications were less than $10 in 45% and 31.8% of observations, respectively, and more prevalent in the Northeast and West patient subsets than in the South subset. Overall, RDCI score was significantly higher for OV copays less than $10 as well as for medication copays less than $25, both independent of region or race. Additionally, RDCI was significantly lower for privately insured than Medicare individuals (RDCI -0.78, 95% CI [-0.41 to -1.15], P < 0.001) and Medicaid (RDCI -0.83, 95% CI [-0.13 to -1.54], P = 0.020), independent of region and race.

Conclusion: Cost sharing may not facilitate optimum care for patients with RA, especially in the Southern regions. More support may be required of government insurance plans to accommodate patients with RA with a high disease burden.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

费用分担与类风湿关节炎疾病负担的关系。
目的:评价美国费用分担的地区差异及其与类风湿关节炎(RA)疾病负担的关系。方法:对美国东北部、南部和西部地区风湿病科就诊的RA患者进行评估。收集社会人口统计数据、RA疾病状况和合并症,并计算风湿病合并症指数(RDCI)评分。记录了主要保险类型和办公室就诊(OVs)和药物的共同支付。对地区间的单变量两两差异进行了分析,并估计了多变量回归模型来评估RDCI与保险、地理区域和种族的关系。结果:在402例以女性为主的白人RA患者队列中,大多数接受政府与私人赞助的初级保险(40%对27.9%)。南方地区患者的疾病活动性和RDCI最高,那里的OVs共付费用通常超过25美元。在45%和31.8%的观察中,OVs和药物的共付额分别低于10美元,并且在东北和西部患者亚群中比在南部亚群中更普遍。总体而言,对于OV共付费用低于10美元以及药物共付费用低于25美元的患者,RDCI评分显着较高,与地区或种族无关。此外,私人参保的RDCI显著低于医疗保险个体(RDCI为-0.78,95% CI[-0.41至-1.15],P结论:费用分摊可能不利于RA患者的最佳护理,特别是在南方地区。政府保险计划可能需要更多的支持,以适应具有高疾病负担的类风湿性关节炎患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信