Superior predictive value of transmural over endoscopic severity for colectomy risk in ulcerative colitis: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Nicole Piazza O Sed, Daniele Noviello, Elisabetta Filippi, Francesco Conforti, Federica Furfaro, Mirella Fraquelli, Andrea Costantino, Silvio Danese, Maurizio Vecchi, Gionata Fiorino, Mariangela Allocca, Flavio Caprioli
{"title":"Superior predictive value of transmural over endoscopic severity for colectomy risk in ulcerative colitis: a multicentre prospective cohort study.","authors":"Nicole Piazza O Sed, Daniele Noviello, Elisabetta Filippi, Francesco Conforti, Federica Furfaro, Mirella Fraquelli, Andrea Costantino, Silvio Danese, Maurizio Vecchi, Gionata Fiorino, Mariangela Allocca, Flavio Caprioli","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Endoscopic activity is associated with an increased risk of surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. Transmural activity, as defined by Milan Ultrasound Criteria [MUC] > 6.2, reliably detects endoscopic activity in patients with UC. The present study aimed to assess in UC patients whether transmural severity is a better predictor of colectomy as compared to endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive adult UC patients were recruited in two IBD Referral Centres and underwent colonoscopy and intestinal ultrasound in a blinded fashion. The need for colectomy was assessed at follow-up. Univariable and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed. Receiver operating characteristic [ROC] analysis was used to compare MUC baseline values and Mayo Endoscopic Scores [MES] in predicting colectomy risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 141 patients were enrolled, and 13 underwent colectomy in the follow-up period. Both MES (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-8.37, p = 0.02) and MUC [HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.19-1.76, p < 0.001] were associated with colectomy risk, but only MUC was independently associated with this event on multivariable analysis [HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.06-2.02, p = 0.02]. MUC was the only independent variable associated with colectomy risk in patients with clinically active disease (odds ratio [OR]: 1.53 [1.03-2.27], p = 0.03). MUC demonstrated higher accuracy than MES (area under ROC curve [AUROC] 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.92 vs 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.80) and better performance for predicting colectomy [p = 0.02]. The optimal MUC score cut-off value for predicting colectomy, as assessed by the Youden index, was 7.7.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A superior predictive value was found for transmural vs endoscopic severity for colectomy risk in UC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohns & Colitis","volume":" ","pages":"291-299"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohns & Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Endoscopic activity is associated with an increased risk of surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. Transmural activity, as defined by Milan Ultrasound Criteria [MUC] > 6.2, reliably detects endoscopic activity in patients with UC. The present study aimed to assess in UC patients whether transmural severity is a better predictor of colectomy as compared to endoscopy.

Methods: Consecutive adult UC patients were recruited in two IBD Referral Centres and underwent colonoscopy and intestinal ultrasound in a blinded fashion. The need for colectomy was assessed at follow-up. Univariable and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed. Receiver operating characteristic [ROC] analysis was used to compare MUC baseline values and Mayo Endoscopic Scores [MES] in predicting colectomy risk.

Results: Overall, 141 patients were enrolled, and 13 underwent colectomy in the follow-up period. Both MES (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-8.37, p = 0.02) and MUC [HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.19-1.76, p < 0.001] were associated with colectomy risk, but only MUC was independently associated with this event on multivariable analysis [HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.06-2.02, p = 0.02]. MUC was the only independent variable associated with colectomy risk in patients with clinically active disease (odds ratio [OR]: 1.53 [1.03-2.27], p = 0.03). MUC demonstrated higher accuracy than MES (area under ROC curve [AUROC] 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.92 vs 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.80) and better performance for predicting colectomy [p = 0.02]. The optimal MUC score cut-off value for predicting colectomy, as assessed by the Youden index, was 7.7.

Conclusions: A superior predictive value was found for transmural vs endoscopic severity for colectomy risk in UC patients.

溃疡性结肠炎结肠切除术风险的跨膜预测价值优于内镜严重程度:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
背景和目的:内镜活动与溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者手术风险增加有关。米兰超声标准[MUC] > 6.2所定义的经壁活动度能可靠地检测出UC患者的内镜活动度。本研究旨在评估与内镜检查相比,经膜严重程度是否能更好地预测 UC 患者是否需要进行结肠切除术:方法:在两家 IBD 转诊中心连续招募成年 UC 患者,在盲法下进行结肠镜检查和肠道超声检查。随访时评估是否需要进行结肠切除术。进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析以及 Cox 回归分析。受体操作特征[ROC]分析用于比较MUC基线值和梅奥内镜评分[MES]在预测结肠切除术风险方面的作用:结果:共有 141 名患者入选,其中 13 名患者在随访期间接受了结肠切除术。MES(危险比 [HR]:3.15,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.18-8.37,P = 0.02)和 MUC [HR:1.48,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.19-1.76,P经膜严重程度与内镜严重程度对 UC 患者结肠切除术风险的预测价值更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Crohns & Colitis
Journal of Crohns & Colitis 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1048
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Crohns and Colitis is concerned with the dissemination of knowledge on clinical, basic science and innovative methods related to inflammatory bowel diseases. The journal publishes original articles, review papers, editorials, leading articles, viewpoints, case reports, innovative methods and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信