Translabial Ultrasound: An Effective Modality for Evaluation of Midurethral Sling Revision.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ellen Clark, Daniela Escobar Wermuth, Janine Oliver, Alison Sheridan
{"title":"Translabial Ultrasound: An Effective Modality for Evaluation of Midurethral Sling Revision.","authors":"Ellen Clark,&nbsp;Daniela Escobar Wermuth,&nbsp;Janine Oliver,&nbsp;Alison Sheridan","doi":"10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Midurethral sling (MUS) surgical procedures, in which a polypropylene synthetic mesh graft is transvaginally placed to support the urethra and manage stress urinary incontinence (SUI), is commonly performed ( Urology. 2013;82(1):38-41; Radiology. 2018;289(3):728-729). Within 10 years of sling placement, about 1 in 20 women undergo subsequent surgery to revise their mesh, in which the mesh is cut or partially excised ( Obstet Gynecol . 2019;133:1099-1108). Translabial ultrasound (TLUS) has been described as a sensitive technique for viewing MUS, although few studies have evaluated its ability to view surgically revised MUS ( Radiology . 2018;289(3):721-727). Understanding the anatomy of the MUS is critical to urologists and urogynecologists striving to optimize management of patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms and history of MUS. To assess the clinical utility and reliability of TLUS as a diagnostic tool in its detection of MUS discontinuity, we conducted a retrospective analysis on patients who underwent TLUS at a tertiary care center between September 2017 and May 2020 for indication of lower urinary tract symptoms and history of MUS placement. Performance of TLUS was evaluated by comparing findings with operative or clinical records. Among the 81 women included, detection of MUS revision, which was defined as a discontinuity in sling material, had a sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 97.1%. Translabial ultrasound is an inexpensive, nonirradiating, and noninvasive modality that is effective at visualizing MUSs. It is a reliable identifier of previous MUS revision, in which it detects a midline discontinuity of the hyperechoic mesh with an average 10 mm gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":49116,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Midurethral sling (MUS) surgical procedures, in which a polypropylene synthetic mesh graft is transvaginally placed to support the urethra and manage stress urinary incontinence (SUI), is commonly performed ( Urology. 2013;82(1):38-41; Radiology. 2018;289(3):728-729). Within 10 years of sling placement, about 1 in 20 women undergo subsequent surgery to revise their mesh, in which the mesh is cut or partially excised ( Obstet Gynecol . 2019;133:1099-1108). Translabial ultrasound (TLUS) has been described as a sensitive technique for viewing MUS, although few studies have evaluated its ability to view surgically revised MUS ( Radiology . 2018;289(3):721-727). Understanding the anatomy of the MUS is critical to urologists and urogynecologists striving to optimize management of patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms and history of MUS. To assess the clinical utility and reliability of TLUS as a diagnostic tool in its detection of MUS discontinuity, we conducted a retrospective analysis on patients who underwent TLUS at a tertiary care center between September 2017 and May 2020 for indication of lower urinary tract symptoms and history of MUS placement. Performance of TLUS was evaluated by comparing findings with operative or clinical records. Among the 81 women included, detection of MUS revision, which was defined as a discontinuity in sling material, had a sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 97.1%. Translabial ultrasound is an inexpensive, nonirradiating, and noninvasive modality that is effective at visualizing MUSs. It is a reliable identifier of previous MUS revision, in which it detects a midline discontinuity of the hyperechoic mesh with an average 10 mm gap.

经唇超声:评价中尿道吊带修复术的有效方法。
摘要:尿道中悬吊(MUS)手术是一种常见的手术方法,通过阴道放置聚丙烯合成网状移植物来支撑尿道并治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)(泌尿外科,2013;82(1):38-41;放射学。2018;289(3):728 - 729)。在放置吊带的10年内,大约每20名妇女中就有1人接受后续手术来修改其补片,其中补片被切断或部分切除。133:1099 2019; 1108)。经唇超声(tlu)被描述为一种观察MUS的敏感技术,尽管很少有研究评估其观察手术修正MUS的能力(放射学)。289(3): 721 - 2018; 727)。了解小囊炎的解剖结构对于泌尿科医生和泌尿妇科医生努力优化下尿路症状和小囊炎病史患者的管理至关重要。为了评估TLUS作为检测MUS不连续诊断工具的临床效用和可靠性,我们对2017年9月至2020年5月在三级保健中心接受TLUS的患者进行了回顾性分析,以了解下尿路症状的指征和MUS放置史。通过与手术或临床记录的比较来评估TLUS的性能。在纳入的81名女性中,检测MUS修正(定义为吊带材料的不连续性)的敏感性为84.6%,特异性为97.1%。跨唇超声是一种廉价、无辐射、无创的方法,可有效地观察非典型骨肉瘤。它是以前的MUS修订的可靠标识符,其中它检测到具有平均10毫米间隙的高回声网格的中线不连续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Quarterly
Ultrasound Quarterly RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasound Quarterly provides coverage of the newest, most sophisticated ultrasound techniques as well as in-depth analysis of important developments in this dynamic field. The journal publishes reviews of a wide variety of topics including trans-vaginal ultrasonography, detection of fetal anomalies, color Doppler flow imaging, pediatric ultrasonography, and breast sonography. Official Journal of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信