Design and development of a Telemedicine Assessment Toolkit (TAT) for the assessment of audiovisual telemedicine encounters.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-24 DOI:10.1177/1357633X231194381
Raphael Agbali, E Andrew Balas, Vahe Heboyan, Jeane Silva, Steven Coughlin, Francesco Beltrame, Gianluca De Leo
{"title":"Design and development of a Telemedicine Assessment Toolkit (TAT) for the assessment of audiovisual telemedicine encounters.","authors":"Raphael Agbali, E Andrew Balas, Vahe Heboyan, Jeane Silva, Steven Coughlin, Francesco Beltrame, Gianluca De Leo","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231194381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the use of audiovisual telemedicine has grown in recent years especially during recent COVID-19-related lockdowns, evidence shows there is still a lack of tools that can be used for the assessment of telemedicine encounters. The few validated questionnaires that are available for assessing telemedicine encounters are not often used. Non-validated questionnaires dominate research, leading to results that cannot be compared or extrapolated to other research or medical sites. Development of standard measures for the assessment of telemedicine encounters has been advocated by stakeholders. The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive set of measures by developing a conceptual approach and a preliminary Telemedicine Assessment Toolkit (TAT) for the assessment of audiovisual telemedicine encounters. A two-step conceptual approach was used to identify potential domains and sub-domains by qualitative analysis of a pool of questions from studies published from 2016 to 2021. Questions were adopted from validated questionnaires or generated to represent the underlying concept of each sub-domain, resulting in a core block of comprehensive questions. A toolkit is proposed with question-measures that cover the sub-domains relevant to the assessment of telemedicine encounters. This study recommended 11 domains to be used for the assessment of telemedicine encounters: \"usability,\" \"patient satisfaction,\" \"patient-provider interaction,\" \"patient perspectives,\" \"telemedicine readiness,\" \"qualitative feedback,\" \"comparison to standard (in-person) care,\" \"privacy,\" \"technology,\" \"patient feeling,\" and \"patient costs.\" Of the 11 domains, 26 underlying sub-domains were created. From the subdomains, a 30-question core block was proposed. The core-block together with a precursor block aimed to retrieve demographic/patient characteristics and, together with a customizable clinical outcomes block, complete the comprehensive toolkit. The toolkit, upon testing and validation, would enable researchers and system owners to assess patient-oriented aspects of audiovisual telemedicine encounters more accurately and accelerate the adoption of common audiovisual telemedicine assessment measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"437-445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231194381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the use of audiovisual telemedicine has grown in recent years especially during recent COVID-19-related lockdowns, evidence shows there is still a lack of tools that can be used for the assessment of telemedicine encounters. The few validated questionnaires that are available for assessing telemedicine encounters are not often used. Non-validated questionnaires dominate research, leading to results that cannot be compared or extrapolated to other research or medical sites. Development of standard measures for the assessment of telemedicine encounters has been advocated by stakeholders. The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive set of measures by developing a conceptual approach and a preliminary Telemedicine Assessment Toolkit (TAT) for the assessment of audiovisual telemedicine encounters. A two-step conceptual approach was used to identify potential domains and sub-domains by qualitative analysis of a pool of questions from studies published from 2016 to 2021. Questions were adopted from validated questionnaires or generated to represent the underlying concept of each sub-domain, resulting in a core block of comprehensive questions. A toolkit is proposed with question-measures that cover the sub-domains relevant to the assessment of telemedicine encounters. This study recommended 11 domains to be used for the assessment of telemedicine encounters: "usability," "patient satisfaction," "patient-provider interaction," "patient perspectives," "telemedicine readiness," "qualitative feedback," "comparison to standard (in-person) care," "privacy," "technology," "patient feeling," and "patient costs." Of the 11 domains, 26 underlying sub-domains were created. From the subdomains, a 30-question core block was proposed. The core-block together with a precursor block aimed to retrieve demographic/patient characteristics and, together with a customizable clinical outcomes block, complete the comprehensive toolkit. The toolkit, upon testing and validation, would enable researchers and system owners to assess patient-oriented aspects of audiovisual telemedicine encounters more accurately and accelerate the adoption of common audiovisual telemedicine assessment measures.

设计和开发用于评估视听远程医疗接触的远程医疗评估工具包(TAT)。
尽管视听远程医疗的使用近年来有所增加,特别是在最近与covid -19相关的封锁期间,但有证据表明,仍然缺乏可用于评估远程医疗遭遇的工具。可用于评估远程医疗就诊的少数有效问卷并不经常使用。未经验证的调查问卷在研究中占主导地位,导致无法将结果与其他研究或医疗场所进行比较或外推。利益攸关方一直提倡制定评估远程医疗会诊的标准措施。本研究的目的是通过开发一种概念性方法和初步远程医疗评估工具包(TAT)来提供一套全面的措施,用于评估视听远程医疗接触。通过对2016年至2021年发表的研究中的问题池进行定性分析,采用两步概念方法识别潜在领域和子领域。从经过验证的问卷中选取问题或生成问题来表示每个子领域的潜在概念,从而形成一个综合问题的核心块。提出了一个包含问题度量的工具包,涵盖了与远程医疗相遇评估相关的子领域。本研究推荐了11个用于评估远程医疗遭遇的领域:“可用性”、“患者满意度”、“患者-提供者互动”、“患者观点”、“远程医疗准备”、“定性反馈”、“与标准(亲自)护理的比较”、“隐私”、“技术”、“患者感觉”和“患者成本”。在11个域中,创建了26个底层子域。从子域出发,提出了一个包含30个问题的核心块。核心模块和前体模块旨在检索人口统计学/患者特征,并与可定制的临床结果模块一起,完成综合工具包。经过测试和验证,该工具包将使研究人员和系统所有者能够更准确地评估视听远程医疗遇到的面向患者的方面,并加速采用共同的视听远程医疗评估措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信