Clinical Outcome of Transfemoral Direct Socket Interface (Part 2).

Q3 Medicine
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-08 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.33137/cpoj.v4i1.36065
J Walker, W R Marable, C Smith, B Þ Sigurjónsson, I F Atlason, G A Johannesson
{"title":"Clinical Outcome of Transfemoral Direct Socket Interface (Part 2).","authors":"J Walker, W R Marable, C Smith, B Þ Sigurjónsson, I F Atlason, G A Johannesson","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v4i1.36065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amputation at the transfemoral (TF) level reduces the rate of successful prosthetic fitting, functional outcome, and quality of life (QoL) compared with transtibial amputation. The TF socket interface is considered the most critical part of the prosthesis, but socket discomfort is still the most common user complaint. Direct Socket for transfemoral prosthesis users is a novel interface fabrication process where the socket is shaped and laminated directly on the residual limb and delivered in a single visit.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate if prosthetic users' quality of life (QoL), comfort, and mobility with a Direct Socket TF interface were comparable to their experience with their previous prostheses.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The pre/post design prospective cohort study included 47 subjects. From this cohort, 36 subjects completed the 6-months follow-up (mean age 58 years, 27 males). Outcomes at baseline included EQ-5D-5L<sup>®</sup>, PLUS-M™, CLASS, ABC, AMPPRO, and TUG. At 6-weeks and 6-months, subjects repeated all measures. Seven Certified Prosthetist (CP) investigators performed observations and data collection at six different sites (from July 2018 to April 2020).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Results showed significant improvement in all outcome measures for the 36 subjects that completed both 6-weeks and 6-months follow-ups. CLASS sub-scales showed significantly improved stability, suspension, comfort, and socket appearance. Improvement in K-Level and less use of assistive devices were observed with the AMPPRO instrument, indicating improved user mobility and performance. QoL was also increased, as measured in Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALY) from the EQ-5D-5L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence from the findings demonstrate that the Direct Socket TF system and procedure can be a good alternative to the traditional method of prosthetic interface delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":32763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"36065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i1.36065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Amputation at the transfemoral (TF) level reduces the rate of successful prosthetic fitting, functional outcome, and quality of life (QoL) compared with transtibial amputation. The TF socket interface is considered the most critical part of the prosthesis, but socket discomfort is still the most common user complaint. Direct Socket for transfemoral prosthesis users is a novel interface fabrication process where the socket is shaped and laminated directly on the residual limb and delivered in a single visit.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate if prosthetic users' quality of life (QoL), comfort, and mobility with a Direct Socket TF interface were comparable to their experience with their previous prostheses.

Methodology: The pre/post design prospective cohort study included 47 subjects. From this cohort, 36 subjects completed the 6-months follow-up (mean age 58 years, 27 males). Outcomes at baseline included EQ-5D-5L®, PLUS-M™, CLASS, ABC, AMPPRO, and TUG. At 6-weeks and 6-months, subjects repeated all measures. Seven Certified Prosthetist (CP) investigators performed observations and data collection at six different sites (from July 2018 to April 2020).

Findings: Results showed significant improvement in all outcome measures for the 36 subjects that completed both 6-weeks and 6-months follow-ups. CLASS sub-scales showed significantly improved stability, suspension, comfort, and socket appearance. Improvement in K-Level and less use of assistive devices were observed with the AMPPRO instrument, indicating improved user mobility and performance. QoL was also increased, as measured in Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALY) from the EQ-5D-5L.

Conclusions: Evidence from the findings demonstrate that the Direct Socket TF system and procedure can be a good alternative to the traditional method of prosthetic interface delivery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经股骨直接插座接口的临床效果(第二部分)。
背景:与经胫骨截肢相比,经股(TF)截肢会降低假肢安装的成功率、功能效果和生活质量(QoL)。TF插座接口被认为是假肢最关键的部分,但插座不适仍是用户最常抱怨的问题。为经股假肢使用者设计的直接插座是一种新颖的接口制作工艺,插座直接在残肢上塑形和贴合,一次即可完成:本研究旨在调查使用直接插座TF接口的假肢使用者的生活质量(QoL)、舒适度和活动能力是否与他们之前使用假肢的体验相当:前/后设计的前瞻性队列研究包括 47 名受试者。其中,36 名受试者完成了 6 个月的随访(平均年龄 58 岁,27 名男性)。基线结果包括 EQ-5D-5L®、PLUS-M™、CLASS、ABC、AMPPRO 和 TUG。在 6 周和 6 个月时,受试者重复进行所有测量。七名认证假体修复师(CP)调查员在六个不同地点(2018 年 7 月至 2020 年 4 月)进行了观察和数据收集:结果显示,完成 6 周和 6 个月随访的 36 名受试者的所有结果指标均有明显改善。CLASS分量表显示,稳定性、悬浮性、舒适性和牙槽窝外观均有明显改善。使用 AMPPRO 仪器观察到 K 水平有所改善,辅助器械的使用也有所减少,这表明使用者的活动能力和表现都有所提高。根据 EQ-5D-5L 以质量调整生命年(QALY)来衡量,用户的 QoL 也得到了提高:研究结果表明,直接插座 TF 系统和程序可以很好地替代传统的假体接口安装方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Prosthetics  Orthotics Journal
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信