Prognosticating the Outcomes of HIE with Certainty: Mission Impossible? - Commentary on "Clinical Prediction Models and Predictors for Death or Adverse Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Term Newborns with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature".

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Neonatology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1159/000531189
Nicole M Anderson, Matthew Hicks, Po-Yin Cheung
{"title":"Prognosticating the Outcomes of HIE with Certainty: Mission Impossible? - Commentary on \"Clinical Prediction Models and Predictors for Death or Adverse Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Term Newborns with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature\".","authors":"Nicole M Anderson, Matthew Hicks, Po-Yin Cheung","doi":"10.1159/000531189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inevitably, one of the first questions asked by parents of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is “will my baby be okay?” This is, of course, a multifaceted question that likely relates to both survival and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, there are significant challenges in prognosticating the outcomes of HIE with certainty. Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is the standard of care for near-term and term neonates with moderate or severe HIE in high-income countries as evidenced by both safety and efficacy of the treatment in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of large multicenter trials involving over 1,500 neonates [1]. Although TH has improved mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment, the adverse outcomes remain significant. Indeed, HIE is the single greatest contribution to disability worldwide and accounts for one-tenth of all disability-adjusted life years [2]. In 1973, Brown et al. [3] first described that when asphyxia occurred in association with subsequent neurological signs there might be long-term adverse outcomes. Since then, various clinical, biochemical, neurophysiological, neuroimaging, and neurobehavioral findings have been studied regarding the respective prognostic values on HIE outcomes individually and in combination in prediction models. However, most prognostic factors that have been identified are available late after the hospital admission, during or after TH. Excluding those publications prior to the era of TH and due to other ineligible factors, over 100 studies have been published to examine the prediction of HIE outcomes. Dr. Langeslag et al. [4] took on the daunting task of performing a systematic review of prediction models. Their review is comprehensive, rigorous and it follows the PRISMA and CHARMS guidelines with a robust and transparent search strategy and risk of bias assessment. The work provides a detailed review of the literature of prediction models and predictors for death and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates with HIE during the therapeutic hypothermia era. While it is evident that the initial aim was to identify clinical prediction models for death or adverse neurodevelopmental outcome, given the methodological","PeriodicalId":18924,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inevitably, one of the first questions asked by parents of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is “will my baby be okay?” This is, of course, a multifaceted question that likely relates to both survival and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, there are significant challenges in prognosticating the outcomes of HIE with certainty. Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is the standard of care for near-term and term neonates with moderate or severe HIE in high-income countries as evidenced by both safety and efficacy of the treatment in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of large multicenter trials involving over 1,500 neonates [1]. Although TH has improved mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment, the adverse outcomes remain significant. Indeed, HIE is the single greatest contribution to disability worldwide and accounts for one-tenth of all disability-adjusted life years [2]. In 1973, Brown et al. [3] first described that when asphyxia occurred in association with subsequent neurological signs there might be long-term adverse outcomes. Since then, various clinical, biochemical, neurophysiological, neuroimaging, and neurobehavioral findings have been studied regarding the respective prognostic values on HIE outcomes individually and in combination in prediction models. However, most prognostic factors that have been identified are available late after the hospital admission, during or after TH. Excluding those publications prior to the era of TH and due to other ineligible factors, over 100 studies have been published to examine the prediction of HIE outcomes. Dr. Langeslag et al. [4] took on the daunting task of performing a systematic review of prediction models. Their review is comprehensive, rigorous and it follows the PRISMA and CHARMS guidelines with a robust and transparent search strategy and risk of bias assessment. The work provides a detailed review of the literature of prediction models and predictors for death and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates with HIE during the therapeutic hypothermia era. While it is evident that the initial aim was to identify clinical prediction models for death or adverse neurodevelopmental outcome, given the methodological
确定HIE预后:不可能的任务?-“缺氧缺血性脑病足月新生儿死亡或不良神经发育结果的临床预测模型和预测因子:文献的系统回顾”的评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neonatology
Neonatology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This highly respected and frequently cited journal is a prime source of information in the area of fetal and neonatal research. Original papers present research on all aspects of neonatology, fetal medicine and developmental biology. These papers encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology. Basic science research covers molecular biology, molecular genetics, physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology in fetal and neonatal life. In addition to the classic features the journal accepts papers for the sections Research Briefings and Sources of Neonatal Medicine (historical pieces). Papers reporting results of animal studies should be based upon hypotheses that relate to developmental processes or disorders in the human fetus or neonate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信