Linguistic and auditory temporal processing in children with specific language impairment.

Talita Fortunato-Tavares, Caroline Nunes Rocha, Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade, Débora Maria Befi-Lopes, Eliane Schochat, Arild Hestvik, Richard G Schwartz
{"title":"Linguistic and auditory temporal processing in children with specific language impairment.","authors":"Talita Fortunato-Tavares,&nbsp;Caroline Nunes Rocha,&nbsp;Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade,&nbsp;Débora Maria Befi-Lopes,&nbsp;Eliane Schochat,&nbsp;Arild Hestvik,&nbsp;Richard G Schwartz","doi":"10.1590/s0104-56872009000400003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies suggest the association of specific language impairment (SLI) to deficits in auditory processing. It has been evidenced that children with SLI present deficit in brief stimuli discrimination. Such deficit would lead to difficulties in developing phonological abilities necessary to map phonemes and to effectively and automatically code and decode words and sentences. However, the correlation between temporal processing (TP) and specific deficits in language disorders--such as syntactic comprehension abilities--has received little or no attention.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze the correlation between: TP (through the Frequency Pattern Test--FPT) and Syntactic Complexity Comprehension (through a Sentence Comprehension Task).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixteen children with typical language development (8;9 +/- 1;1 years) and seven children with SLI (8;1 +/- 1;2 years) participated on the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Accuracy of both groups decreased with the increase on syntactic complexity (both p < 0.01). On the between groups comparison, performance difference on the Test of Syntactic Complexity Comprehension (TSCC) was statistically significant (p = 0.02).As expected, children with SLI presented FPT performance outside reference values. On the SLI group, correlations between TSCC and FPT were positive and higher for high syntactic complexity (r = 0.97) than for low syntactic complexity (r = 0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest that FPT is positively correlated to syntactic complexity comprehension abilities.The low performance on FPT could serve as an additional indicator of deficits in complex linguistic processing. Future studies should consider, besides the increase of the sample, longitudinal studies that investigate the effect of frequency pattern auditory training on performance in high syntactic complexity comprehension tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":74581,"journal":{"name":"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica","volume":"21 4","pages":"279-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s0104-56872009000400003","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-56872009000400003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Background: Several studies suggest the association of specific language impairment (SLI) to deficits in auditory processing. It has been evidenced that children with SLI present deficit in brief stimuli discrimination. Such deficit would lead to difficulties in developing phonological abilities necessary to map phonemes and to effectively and automatically code and decode words and sentences. However, the correlation between temporal processing (TP) and specific deficits in language disorders--such as syntactic comprehension abilities--has received little or no attention.

Aim: To analyze the correlation between: TP (through the Frequency Pattern Test--FPT) and Syntactic Complexity Comprehension (through a Sentence Comprehension Task).

Method: Sixteen children with typical language development (8;9 +/- 1;1 years) and seven children with SLI (8;1 +/- 1;2 years) participated on the study.

Results: Accuracy of both groups decreased with the increase on syntactic complexity (both p < 0.01). On the between groups comparison, performance difference on the Test of Syntactic Complexity Comprehension (TSCC) was statistically significant (p = 0.02).As expected, children with SLI presented FPT performance outside reference values. On the SLI group, correlations between TSCC and FPT were positive and higher for high syntactic complexity (r = 0.97) than for low syntactic complexity (r = 0.51).

Conclusion: Results suggest that FPT is positively correlated to syntactic complexity comprehension abilities.The low performance on FPT could serve as an additional indicator of deficits in complex linguistic processing. Future studies should consider, besides the increase of the sample, longitudinal studies that investigate the effect of frequency pattern auditory training on performance in high syntactic complexity comprehension tasks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

特殊语言障碍儿童的语言和听觉时间加工。
背景:一些研究表明特异性语言障碍(SLI)与听觉加工缺陷有关。有证据表明,特殊语言障碍儿童在短刺激识别方面存在缺陷。这种缺陷会导致发展音位能力的困难,这是绘制音位所必需的,也会导致有效和自动编码和解码单词和句子的困难。然而,时间加工(TP)与语言障碍中的特定缺陷(如句法理解能力)之间的相关性很少或没有得到关注。目的:通过频率模式测试(FPT)分析句法复杂性理解(通过句子理解任务)与句法复杂性理解的相关性。方法:对16例典型语言发育儿童(8、9 +/- 1、1岁)和7例特殊语言障碍儿童(8、1 +/- 1、2岁)进行研究。结果:两组的准确率均随句法复杂度的增加而降低(p < 0.01)。两组比较,句法复杂性理解测验(TSCC)成绩差异有统计学意义(p = 0.02)。正如预期的那样,特殊语言障碍儿童的FPT表现超出了参考值。在SLI组,TSCC与FPT呈正相关,且高句法复杂性组的TSCC与FPT呈正相关(r = 0.97),而低句法复杂性组的TSCC与FPT呈正相关(r = 0.51)。结论:FPT与句法复杂性理解能力呈正相关。FPT的低表现可以作为复杂语言处理缺陷的附加指标。未来的研究除了增加样本外,还应考虑纵向研究频率模式听觉训练对高句法复杂性理解任务表现的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信