Evaluation of Sugammadex Dosing for Neurological Examination in the Emergency Department.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy practice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1177/08971900231185817
Garrett B Hile, Morgan E Ostinowsky, Nicholas P Sandusky, Gavin T Howington
{"title":"Evaluation of Sugammadex Dosing for Neurological Examination in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Garrett B Hile, Morgan E Ostinowsky, Nicholas P Sandusky, Gavin T Howington","doi":"10.1177/08971900231185817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Prolong effects of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents after rapid sequence intubation may prevent meaningful neurological examination, delaying appropriate diagnosis and neurosurgical intervention. Sugammadex is indicated for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this study was to evaluate low- (2 mg/kg) vs standard-dose (4 mg/kg) sugammadex for rocuronium-induced deep neuromuscular blockade reversal in the emergency department (ED) by achieving a post-treatment train-of-four (TOF) of 4 to facilitate neurological examination. <b>Methods:</b> This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study evaluating low-vs standard-dose sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal in the ED. <b>Results:</b> 34 patients were identified within the designated time period, 24 of which were included in the final analysis ([n = 9 low-dose], [n = 15 standard-dose]). Median sugammadex doses were 2.3 mg/kg and 4.1 mg/kg for low- and standard-dose, respectively. The majority of patients presented for intraparenchymal hemorrhage (54.2%). No significant difference in success rate of NMBA reversal was found between low- and standard-dose sugammadex ([100.0% vs 93.3%], <i>P</i> = 1.000). A total of 9 patients had a neurosurgical procedure performed after sugammadex administration. Low-dose sugammadex was associated with significantly less acquisition cost compared to the standard dose (<i>P</i> < .001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Low- (2 mg/kg) and standard-dose (4 mg/kg) sugammadex successfully reversed rocuronium-induced deep neuromuscular blockade in the ED by achieving a post-treatment TOF of 4 to facilitate neurologic examination. Low-dose sugammadex may be a viable option for deep NMBA reversal in the ED and is associated with decreased institutional cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900231185817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prolong effects of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents after rapid sequence intubation may prevent meaningful neurological examination, delaying appropriate diagnosis and neurosurgical intervention. Sugammadex is indicated for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate low- (2 mg/kg) vs standard-dose (4 mg/kg) sugammadex for rocuronium-induced deep neuromuscular blockade reversal in the emergency department (ED) by achieving a post-treatment train-of-four (TOF) of 4 to facilitate neurological examination. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study evaluating low-vs standard-dose sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal in the ED. Results: 34 patients were identified within the designated time period, 24 of which were included in the final analysis ([n = 9 low-dose], [n = 15 standard-dose]). Median sugammadex doses were 2.3 mg/kg and 4.1 mg/kg for low- and standard-dose, respectively. The majority of patients presented for intraparenchymal hemorrhage (54.2%). No significant difference in success rate of NMBA reversal was found between low- and standard-dose sugammadex ([100.0% vs 93.3%], P = 1.000). A total of 9 patients had a neurosurgical procedure performed after sugammadex administration. Low-dose sugammadex was associated with significantly less acquisition cost compared to the standard dose (P < .001). Conclusion: Low- (2 mg/kg) and standard-dose (4 mg/kg) sugammadex successfully reversed rocuronium-induced deep neuromuscular blockade in the ED by achieving a post-treatment TOF of 4 to facilitate neurologic examination. Low-dose sugammadex may be a viable option for deep NMBA reversal in the ED and is associated with decreased institutional cost.

评估急诊科神经系统检查的舒格迈司剂量。
背景:快速顺序插管后,非去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂的长期作用可能会妨碍进行有意义的神经系统检查,从而延误适当的诊断和神经外科干预。舒加马定适用于逆转罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞。研究目的本研究的目的是评估低剂量(2 毫克/千克)与标准剂量(4 毫克/千克)舒甘马定在急诊科(ED)中用于罗库溴铵诱导的深部神经肌肉阻滞逆转的效果,即治疗后四次训练(TOF)达到 4,以方便神经系统检查。方法:这是一项单中心、回顾性、队列研究,评估了在急诊室使用低剂量与标准剂量舒马度逆转神经肌肉阻滞的效果。研究结果在指定时间内确定了 34 名患者,其中 24 名纳入最终分析([n = 9 名低剂量],[n = 15 名标准剂量])。低剂量和标准剂量的舒格迈司中位剂量分别为 2.3 毫克/千克和 4.1 毫克/千克。大多数患者因脑实质内出血而就诊(54.2%)。低剂量和标准剂量舒马塞逆转 NMBA 的成功率无明显差异([100.0% vs 93.3%],P = 1.000)。共有 9 名患者在服用舒马定后进行了神经外科手术。与标准剂量相比,低剂量舒甘麦注射液的购置成本显著降低(P < .001)。结论低剂量(2 毫克/千克)和标准剂量(4 毫克/千克)苏格玛德在急诊室成功逆转了罗库溴铵诱导的深部神经肌肉阻滞,治疗后TOF 达到4,便于进行神经系统检查。低剂量舒甘麦可作为急诊室逆转深部神经肌肉阻滞的可行方案,并能降低机构成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信