Serious complications related to regional anaesthesia: Study of Greek Courts' Decisions.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Evangelia Samara, Lampros Tzoumas, Konstantinos Tzoumas, Petros Tzimas, Georgios Papadopoulos
{"title":"Serious complications related to regional anaesthesia: Study of Greek Courts' Decisions.","authors":"Evangelia Samara,&nbsp;Lampros Tzoumas,&nbsp;Konstantinos Tzoumas,&nbsp;Petros Tzimas,&nbsp;Georgios Papadopoulos","doi":"10.5114/ait.2023.129302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regional anaesthesia and analgesia present many advantages. Related complications are few and have been fully described. Information on regional anaesthesia malpractice is lacking in Greece. The objectives of the analysis were to highlight areas of high litigation risk and report the financial impact of claims.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Published judicial decisions of criminal, civil, administrative and disciplinary content, from 1995 to 2020, were searched in the legal information banks. The court decisions were analysed by an expert in collaboration with the lawyers of the investigation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 court decisions related to complications from regional anaesthesia were found involving 10 cases, which comprised: 8 convictions, 1 referral of the case for a new expert opinion and 1 acquittal. In 6 cases the medical negligence involved complications after epidural anaesthesia and in 2 after subarachnoid anaesthesia. In 1 case there was collective liability of the anaesthesiologist and the obstetrician for negligent homicide and in 7 cases liability of the anaesthesiologist for bodily injuries. The duration of the litigation was 5-16 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysis of court cases made it possible to identify the causes that led to complications during regional anaesthesia. Informed consent, non-traumatic technique, careful patient selection, adherence to safety rules, and early diagnosis and treatment of complications are essential to avoid permanent injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"55 2","pages":"109-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/34/d6/AIT-55-51044.PMC10415607.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2023.129302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Regional anaesthesia and analgesia present many advantages. Related complications are few and have been fully described. Information on regional anaesthesia malpractice is lacking in Greece. The objectives of the analysis were to highlight areas of high litigation risk and report the financial impact of claims.

Methods: Published judicial decisions of criminal, civil, administrative and disciplinary content, from 1995 to 2020, were searched in the legal information banks. The court decisions were analysed by an expert in collaboration with the lawyers of the investigation.

Results: A total of 26 court decisions related to complications from regional anaesthesia were found involving 10 cases, which comprised: 8 convictions, 1 referral of the case for a new expert opinion and 1 acquittal. In 6 cases the medical negligence involved complications after epidural anaesthesia and in 2 after subarachnoid anaesthesia. In 1 case there was collective liability of the anaesthesiologist and the obstetrician for negligent homicide and in 7 cases liability of the anaesthesiologist for bodily injuries. The duration of the litigation was 5-16 years.

Conclusions: Analysis of court cases made it possible to identify the causes that led to complications during regional anaesthesia. Informed consent, non-traumatic technique, careful patient selection, adherence to safety rules, and early diagnosis and treatment of complications are essential to avoid permanent injury.

与区域麻醉相关的严重并发症:希腊法院判决的研究。
背景:区域麻醉和镇痛具有许多优点。相关并发症很少,并已得到充分的描述。希腊缺乏关于区域麻醉不当行为的信息。分析的目的是突出诉讼风险高的领域,并报告索赔的财务影响。方法:检索1995年~ 2020年法律信息库中已公布的刑事、民事、行政、惩戒等司法判决书内容。一名专家与参与调查的律师合作,对法院的判决进行了分析。结果:共发现与区域麻醉并发症相关的26个法院判决,涉及10例,其中:定罪8例,转介新的专家意见1例,无罪1例。6例出现硬膜外麻醉并发症,2例出现蛛网膜下腔麻醉。在1个案例中麻醉师和产科医生因过失杀人承担集体责任在7个案例中麻醉师因身体伤害承担集体责任。诉讼时间为5-16年。结论:通过对法庭案例的分析,可以确定导致区域麻醉并发症的原因。知情同意、非创伤性技术、仔细选择患者、遵守安全规则以及早期诊断和治疗并发症对于避免永久性伤害至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信