FANTASTIC lifestyle questionnaire from 1983 until 2022: A review.

IF 2.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Patrícia Batista, João Neves-Amado, Anabela Pereira, João Amado
{"title":"FANTASTIC lifestyle questionnaire from 1983 until 2022: A review.","authors":"Patrícia Batista,&nbsp;João Neves-Amado,&nbsp;Anabela Pereira,&nbsp;João Amado","doi":"10.34172/hpp.2023.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studying lifestyles has always been important; quantifying them has become more complex. However, a questionnaire produced in 1983 has shown that its simple form of evaluation can be an added value in understanding lifestyles. Our aim is a systematic review of the scientific literature about the use of the FANTASTIC Lifestyle questionnaire (FLQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The reflective systematic literature review on PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, and SCIELO databases with the descriptors \"FANTASTIC Lifestyle questionnaire\" OR \"FANTASTICO questionnaire\" OR \"FANTASTIC questionnaire\" OR \"FANTASTIC survey\" OR \"FANTASTIC checklist\". PRISMA criteria reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were applied. The inclusion criteria were the use of FLQ instrument to measure lifestyles, presenting quantitative or qualitative results, and psychometric studies. It excluded other lifestyle instruments, incomplete articles, and non-English, Brazilian, Spanish, and Portuguese language articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings reveal 41 scientific articles included in the study. It analyzed the results and most studies use the instrument to assess all dimensions. However, some studies reported assessing specific dimensions such as nutrition, sleep, stress, tobacco, alcohol, and drugs. The questionnaire has been applied to a wide range of ages and literacy levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This literature review allowed us to conclude that this questionnaire is still in use today and is applied in several contexts and populations. It is also possible to verify the relevance of its use and to design intervention strategies and programs for a healthy society. It is essential to draw attention to this issue and promote health literacy (HL) on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2023.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studying lifestyles has always been important; quantifying them has become more complex. However, a questionnaire produced in 1983 has shown that its simple form of evaluation can be an added value in understanding lifestyles. Our aim is a systematic review of the scientific literature about the use of the FANTASTIC Lifestyle questionnaire (FLQ).

Methods: The reflective systematic literature review on PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, and SCIELO databases with the descriptors "FANTASTIC Lifestyle questionnaire" OR "FANTASTICO questionnaire" OR "FANTASTIC questionnaire" OR "FANTASTIC survey" OR "FANTASTIC checklist". PRISMA criteria reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were applied. The inclusion criteria were the use of FLQ instrument to measure lifestyles, presenting quantitative or qualitative results, and psychometric studies. It excluded other lifestyle instruments, incomplete articles, and non-English, Brazilian, Spanish, and Portuguese language articles.

Results: Findings reveal 41 scientific articles included in the study. It analyzed the results and most studies use the instrument to assess all dimensions. However, some studies reported assessing specific dimensions such as nutrition, sleep, stress, tobacco, alcohol, and drugs. The questionnaire has been applied to a wide range of ages and literacy levels.

Conclusion: This literature review allowed us to conclude that this questionnaire is still in use today and is applied in several contexts and populations. It is also possible to verify the relevance of its use and to design intervention strategies and programs for a healthy society. It is essential to draw attention to this issue and promote health literacy (HL) on this topic.

Abstract Image

从1983年到2022年的奇妙生活方式问卷:回顾。
背景:研究生活方式一直很重要;量化它们变得更加复杂。然而,1983年制作的一份问卷显示,其简单的评估形式可以成为了解生活方式的附加价值。我们的目的是系统地回顾关于使用奇妙生活方式问卷(FLQ)的科学文献。方法:在PubMed、Medline、Science Direct和SCIELO数据库中采用“奇妙生活方式问卷”或“FANTASTICO问卷”或“奇妙问卷”或“奇妙调查”或“奇妙清单”等描述语进行反思性系统文献综述。采用PRISMA标准报告系统评价和荟萃分析。纳入标准为使用FLQ仪器测量生活方式,呈现定量或定性结果,以及心理测量学研究。它排除了其他生活方式工具、不完整的文章和非英语、巴西语、西班牙语和葡萄牙语的文章。结果:研究结果揭示了研究中包含的41篇科学论文。它分析了结果,大多数研究使用该工具来评估所有维度。然而,一些研究报告评估了具体的方面,如营养、睡眠、压力、烟草、酒精和药物。问卷适用于不同年龄和文化水平的人群。结论:这篇文献综述让我们得出结论,这个问卷仍然在今天使用,并在几个背景和人群中应用。还可以验证其使用的相关性,并为健康社会设计干预策略和方案。必须引起人们对这一问题的注意,并促进有关这一主题的卫生知识普及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Promotion Perspectives PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信