Risk Factors and Causes of Reoperation in Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Retrospective Case Series with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

Tao Tang, Jiahao Liu, Jian Cao, Dingwen He, Xigao Cheng, Shuihua Xie
{"title":"Risk Factors and Causes of Reoperation in Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Retrospective Case Series with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Tao Tang,&nbsp;Jiahao Liu,&nbsp;Jian Cao,&nbsp;Dingwen He,&nbsp;Xigao Cheng,&nbsp;Shuihua Xie","doi":"10.12659/MSM.939844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has gained popularity as a minimally invasive surgery for treating lumbar disc herniation. However, there is limited research focusing on the reoperation rate and its associated factors. This study aims to investigate the rate of reoperation and identify the causes and risk factors for reoperation after PELD. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PELD (interlaminar and transforaminal approaches) at our hospital from November 2016 to May 2020. A matched case-control design was employed to identify relevant risk factors for reoperation, with a matching ratio of 1:3. Clinical characteristics and radiological parameters were compared, and univariate analysis was performed using independent samples t-test and chi-squared test. RESULTS Among the 435 patients included in the study, the reoperation rate for those with a minimum 2-year follow-up was 6.2% (27/435). The causes of reoperation and their respective rates were as follows: recurrence of lumbar disc herniation (3.2%, 14/435), incomplete decompression (1.8%, 8/435), persistent low back pain (0.7%, 3/435), and postoperative infection (0.5%, 2/435). Univariate analysis revealed that age (P=0.015), Pfirrmann grade IV-V (P=0.017), and lack of active straight leg raise exercises (P=0.026) were significantly associated with reoperation. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that age (P=0.001), Pfirrmann grade IV-V (P=0.033), and lack of active straight leg raise exercises postoperatively (P=0.003) were independent risk factors for reoperation after PELD. CONCLUSIONS The primary cause of reoperation in lumbar disc herniation patients after PELD was recurrence of the herniation. Additionally, severe disc degeneration, older age, and lack of active straight leg raise exercises were identified as significant risk factors associated with an increased reoperation rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":18276,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","volume":"29 ","pages":"e939844"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/90/60/medscimonit-29-e939844.PMC10439676.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has gained popularity as a minimally invasive surgery for treating lumbar disc herniation. However, there is limited research focusing on the reoperation rate and its associated factors. This study aims to investigate the rate of reoperation and identify the causes and risk factors for reoperation after PELD. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PELD (interlaminar and transforaminal approaches) at our hospital from November 2016 to May 2020. A matched case-control design was employed to identify relevant risk factors for reoperation, with a matching ratio of 1:3. Clinical characteristics and radiological parameters were compared, and univariate analysis was performed using independent samples t-test and chi-squared test. RESULTS Among the 435 patients included in the study, the reoperation rate for those with a minimum 2-year follow-up was 6.2% (27/435). The causes of reoperation and their respective rates were as follows: recurrence of lumbar disc herniation (3.2%, 14/435), incomplete decompression (1.8%, 8/435), persistent low back pain (0.7%, 3/435), and postoperative infection (0.5%, 2/435). Univariate analysis revealed that age (P=0.015), Pfirrmann grade IV-V (P=0.017), and lack of active straight leg raise exercises (P=0.026) were significantly associated with reoperation. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that age (P=0.001), Pfirrmann grade IV-V (P=0.033), and lack of active straight leg raise exercises postoperatively (P=0.003) were independent risk factors for reoperation after PELD. CONCLUSIONS The primary cause of reoperation in lumbar disc herniation patients after PELD was recurrence of the herniation. Additionally, severe disc degeneration, older age, and lack of active straight leg raise exercises were identified as significant risk factors associated with an increased reoperation rate.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术后腰椎间盘突出患者再手术的危险因素和原因:至少2年随访的回顾性病例系列。
背景:经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)作为一种治疗腰椎间盘突出症的微创手术已经得到了广泛的应用。然而,关于再手术率及其相关因素的研究较少。本研究旨在调查PELD术后再手术的发生率,明确PELD术后再手术的原因及危险因素。材料与方法我们对2016年11月至2020年5月在我院接受椎间和椎间孔入路手术的患者进行了回顾性分析。采用匹配病例对照设计,确定再手术相关危险因素,匹配比为1:3。比较临床特征和影像学参数,采用独立样本t检验和卡方检验进行单因素分析。结果纳入研究的435例患者中,至少随访2年的再手术率为6.2%(27/435)。再次手术的原因及发生率分别为:腰椎间盘突出症复发(3.2%,14/435)、减压不完全(1.8%,8/435)、持续腰痛(0.7%,3/435)、术后感染(0.5%,2/435)。单因素分析显示,年龄(P=0.015)、Pfirrmann分级IV-V级(P=0.017)和缺乏主动直腿抬高运动(P=0.026)与再手术有显著相关。多元logistic回归分析显示,年龄(P=0.001)、Pfirrmann评分IV-V级(P=0.033)、术后缺乏主动直腿抬高运动(P=0.003)是PELD术后再手术的独立危险因素。结论腰椎间盘突出术后再手术的主要原因是腰椎间盘突出症复发。此外,严重的椎间盘退变、年龄较大和缺乏积极的直腿抬高运动被认为是与再手术率增加相关的重要危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信