Factors influencing outcomes of pelvic osteotomy for residual acetabular dysplasia following closed reduction in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
YiQiang Li, Hang Liu, YueMing Guo, ShunYou Chen, Federico Canavese, YanHan Liu, JingChun Li, HongWen Xu, HuiMin Xia
{"title":"Factors influencing outcomes of pelvic osteotomy for residual acetabular dysplasia following closed reduction in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.","authors":"YiQiang Li, Hang Liu, YueMing Guo, ShunYou Chen, Federico Canavese, YanHan Liu, JingChun Li, HongWen Xu, HuiMin Xia","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the factors influencing outcome of pelvic osteotomy (PO) for residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD) following closed reduction (CR) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). We retrospectively reviewed 91 patients (95 hips) with DDH who underwent PO for RAD. Tönnis grade, Acetabular index, Center Edge Angle, Reimer's Index (RI), and avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN) were assessed. Hips were divided into satisfactory (Severin I/II) and unsatisfactory group (Severin III/IV). Finally, 87 hips (91.5%) had satisfactory and 8 (8.5%) unsatisfactory outcomes. The RI before PO was significantly higher in unsatisfactory (49.6 ± 9%) than in satisfactory group (30.6%±11.8%). All patients without AVN had satisfactory outcome, while it was 78.9% of patients with AVN. Logistic regression analysis showed that higher AVN grade and RI before PO were risk factors for unsatisfactory outcome. Satisfactory outcome was obtained in all hips with RI < 33% before PO, while it was 79.5% if RI > 33% before PO (79.5%). There was no difference in the satisfactory rate between patients undergoing open reduction (66.7%) and those not undergoing (83.3%). The rate of satisfactory outcome in patients undergoing femoral osteotomy (63.6%) was lower than those without it (100%). In patients with RAD following CR, good outcome can be expected after PO alone. AVN and preoperative RI > 33% are risk factors for poor outcome. Additional open reduction and femoral osteotomy do not significantly improve outcome of PO in patients with preoperative RI > 33%.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":"340-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the factors influencing outcome of pelvic osteotomy (PO) for residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD) following closed reduction (CR) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). We retrospectively reviewed 91 patients (95 hips) with DDH who underwent PO for RAD. Tönnis grade, Acetabular index, Center Edge Angle, Reimer's Index (RI), and avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN) were assessed. Hips were divided into satisfactory (Severin I/II) and unsatisfactory group (Severin III/IV). Finally, 87 hips (91.5%) had satisfactory and 8 (8.5%) unsatisfactory outcomes. The RI before PO was significantly higher in unsatisfactory (49.6 ± 9%) than in satisfactory group (30.6%±11.8%). All patients without AVN had satisfactory outcome, while it was 78.9% of patients with AVN. Logistic regression analysis showed that higher AVN grade and RI before PO were risk factors for unsatisfactory outcome. Satisfactory outcome was obtained in all hips with RI < 33% before PO, while it was 79.5% if RI > 33% before PO (79.5%). There was no difference in the satisfactory rate between patients undergoing open reduction (66.7%) and those not undergoing (83.3%). The rate of satisfactory outcome in patients undergoing femoral osteotomy (63.6%) was lower than those without it (100%). In patients with RAD following CR, good outcome can be expected after PO alone. AVN and preoperative RI > 33% are risk factors for poor outcome. Additional open reduction and femoral osteotomy do not significantly improve outcome of PO in patients with preoperative RI > 33%.

影响髋关节发育不良患者闭合复位后骨盆截骨术治疗残余髋臼发育不良效果的因素。
研究影响髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者闭合复位(CR)后骨盆截骨术(PO)治疗残余髋臼发育不良(RAD)疗效的因素。我们对 91 例(95 髋)因髋关节发育不良而接受髋臼截骨术的 DDH 患者进行了回顾性研究。对Tönnis分级、髋臼指数、中心边缘角度、Reimer指数(RI)和股骨头血管性坏死(AVN)进行了评估。髋关节被分为满意组(Severin I/II)和不满意组(Severin III/IV)。最后,87个髋关节(91.5%)的结果令人满意,8个髋关节(8.5%)的结果令人不满意。不满意组(49.6±9%)的PO前RI明显高于满意组(30.6%±11.8%)。所有无 AVN 的患者都获得了满意的结果,而有 AVN 的患者中这一比例为 78.9%。逻辑回归分析显示,较高的 AVN 等级和 PO 前的 RI 是结果不满意的风险因素。所有在 PO 前 RI 为 33% 的髋关节(79.5%)都获得了满意的结果。接受切开复位术的患者(66.7%)和未接受切开复位术的患者(83.3%)的满意率没有差异。股骨截骨术患者的满意率(63.6%)低于未进行股骨截骨术的患者(100%)。对于 CR 术后出现 RAD 的患者,仅进行 PO 术即可获得良好疗效。AVN和术前RI>33%是预后不佳的风险因素。对于术前 RI > 33% 的患者,额外的开放复位和股骨截骨术并不能明显改善 PO 的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信