Leveraging Key Informant Interviews to Inform Intervention Development: The Greater Lawndale Healthy Work Project.

Community health equity research & policy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-22 DOI:10.1177/2752535X231196395
Alexis K Grant, Jennifer K Felner, Yvette Castañeda, Preethi Pratap, Jeni Hebert-Beirne
{"title":"Leveraging Key Informant Interviews to Inform Intervention Development: The Greater Lawndale Healthy Work Project.","authors":"Alexis K Grant, Jennifer K Felner, Yvette Castañeda, Preethi Pratap, Jeni Hebert-Beirne","doi":"10.1177/2752535X231196395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Greater Lawndale Healthy Work project is a sequential mixed methods community based participatory research project that examines work as a structural determinant of health and builds community capacity for healthy work in a predominantly Black and Latinx community in Chicago known as Greater Lawndale (GL).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We interviewed community leaders in GL as key informants to understand the barriers to healthy work and inform intervention development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a directed content analysis of transcripts from 20 key informants and coded the social ecology and type of intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Every key informant mentioned at least one asset in GL, showing an opportunity to employ a capacity-oriented approach to intervention development. Key informants suggested a variety of interventions to address precarious work across levels of the social ecology, with individual and community level interventions being the most salient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through this approach, we were able to navigate tensions and challenges in conducting research for community-wide change. Key informant stakeholder interviews can be leveraged to meaningfully inform intervention development and support the development of multi-level, sustainable, and culturally acceptable interventions that advance health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"429-438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X231196395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Greater Lawndale Healthy Work project is a sequential mixed methods community based participatory research project that examines work as a structural determinant of health and builds community capacity for healthy work in a predominantly Black and Latinx community in Chicago known as Greater Lawndale (GL).

Objectives: We interviewed community leaders in GL as key informants to understand the barriers to healthy work and inform intervention development.

Methods: We conducted a directed content analysis of transcripts from 20 key informants and coded the social ecology and type of intervention.

Results: Every key informant mentioned at least one asset in GL, showing an opportunity to employ a capacity-oriented approach to intervention development. Key informants suggested a variety of interventions to address precarious work across levels of the social ecology, with individual and community level interventions being the most salient.

Conclusion: Through this approach, we were able to navigate tensions and challenges in conducting research for community-wide change. Key informant stakeholder interviews can be leveraged to meaningfully inform intervention development and support the development of multi-level, sustainable, and culturally acceptable interventions that advance health equity.

利用关键知情人访谈为干预措施的制定提供信息:大劳恩代尔健康工作项目。
项目背景:大劳恩代尔健康工作项目是一个以社区为基础的连续混合方法参与式研究项目,该项目将工作视为健康的结构性决定因素,并在芝加哥以黑人和拉美裔为主的大劳恩代尔(GL)社区建立健康工作的社区能力:我们采访了作为关键信息提供者的大劳恩代尔社区领袖,以了解健康工作的障碍并为干预措施的制定提供信息:我们对 20 位关键信息提供者的记录进行了定向内容分析,并对社会生态和干预类型进行了编码:每位关键信息提供者都提到了 GL 中的至少一项资产,这表明我们有机会采用以能力为导向的方法来制定干预措施。主要信息提供者提出了各种干预措施,以解决社会生态各个层面的工作不稳定问题,其中个人和社区层面的干预措施最为突出:通过这种方法,我们能够驾驭在开展研究以促进整个社区变革过程中遇到的矛盾和挑战。关键信息利益相关者访谈可以为干预措施的制定提供有意义的信息,并支持多层次、可持续和文化上可接受的干预措施的制定,从而促进健康公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信