Disciplinary differences in the study of the relationship between social variables and mental health: A systematic mapping review.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/13634593211063049
Tegan Cruwys, Baptiste Brossard, Haochen Zhou, Gabriel Helleren-Simpson, Kathleen A Klik, Dirk Van Rooy, Philip J Batterham, Alison L Calear
{"title":"Disciplinary differences in the study of the relationship between social variables and mental health: A systematic mapping review.","authors":"Tegan Cruwys,&nbsp;Baptiste Brossard,&nbsp;Haochen Zhou,&nbsp;Gabriel Helleren-Simpson,&nbsp;Kathleen A Klik,&nbsp;Dirk Van Rooy,&nbsp;Philip J Batterham,&nbsp;Alison L Calear","doi":"10.1177/13634593211063049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There has been sustained interest in the intersection between social constructs and mental health from diverse disciplines including psychiatry, sociology and public health. However, no systematic attempt has been made to catalogue what is meant by 'social' by different researchers, how variables deemed 'social' constructs are linked to mental health, nor whether these patterns differ by academic discipline. Understanding interdisciplinary differences and commonalities may reveal opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance our understanding of how social factors relate to mental health. This article presents a prospectively registered systematic map of social approaches to mental health using an innovative synthesis methodology (coding all sentences from a random selection of <i>N</i> = 287 articles). Results indicated that although approaches are diverse, disciplinary overlap is substantial. Psychology and psychiatry led articles tend to focus on social skills or emotions as <i>features</i> of mental (ill-)health, while public health and social sciences led articles tend to focus on social relationships, status or context as <i>determinants</i> of mental (ill-)health. Medicine led articles were most likely to focus on social <i>outcomes</i> of mental (ill-)health. Potential growth areas are noted, particularly the relative dearth of <i>intervention</i> research drawing upon social approaches. The findings are discussed with a view towards enabling more effective interdisciplinary collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":"27 5","pages":"810-828"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593211063049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There has been sustained interest in the intersection between social constructs and mental health from diverse disciplines including psychiatry, sociology and public health. However, no systematic attempt has been made to catalogue what is meant by 'social' by different researchers, how variables deemed 'social' constructs are linked to mental health, nor whether these patterns differ by academic discipline. Understanding interdisciplinary differences and commonalities may reveal opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance our understanding of how social factors relate to mental health. This article presents a prospectively registered systematic map of social approaches to mental health using an innovative synthesis methodology (coding all sentences from a random selection of N = 287 articles). Results indicated that although approaches are diverse, disciplinary overlap is substantial. Psychology and psychiatry led articles tend to focus on social skills or emotions as features of mental (ill-)health, while public health and social sciences led articles tend to focus on social relationships, status or context as determinants of mental (ill-)health. Medicine led articles were most likely to focus on social outcomes of mental (ill-)health. Potential growth areas are noted, particularly the relative dearth of intervention research drawing upon social approaches. The findings are discussed with a view towards enabling more effective interdisciplinary collaboration.

社会变量与心理健康关系研究的学科差异:一个系统的地图回顾。
包括精神病学、社会学和公共卫生在内的不同学科一直对社会结构与心理健康之间的交集感兴趣。然而,目前还没有系统地尝试对不同的研究人员对“社会”的含义进行分类,对被认为是“社会”结构的变量如何与心理健康联系起来进行分类,也没有系统地尝试对这些模式是否因学科而异进行分类。了解跨学科的差异和共性可能揭示跨学科合作的机会,以加强我们对社会因素如何与心理健康相关的理解。本文采用一种创新的综合方法(从N = 287篇文章中随机选择所有句子进行编码),提出了一种前瞻性登记的心理健康社会方法系统地图。结果表明,尽管方法多样,但学科重叠是实质性的。以心理学和精神病学为主导的文章倾向于把社会技能或情感作为精神(疾病)健康的特征,而以公共卫生和社会科学为主导的文章则倾向于把社会关系、地位或背景作为精神(疾病)健康的决定因素。以医学为主导的文章最有可能关注心理(疾病)健康的社会结果。指出了潜在的增长领域,特别是利用社会方法进行干预研究的相对缺乏。对研究结果进行了讨论,以期实现更有效的跨学科合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health
Health Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信