Implementation strategies to improve posttraumatic stress disorder care in rural veterans

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nancy C. Bernardy PhD, Lisa-Ann J. Cuccurullo PsyD, Macgregor Montano PharmD, Michelle Bowen MSW, Kristen Breen BA, Rebecca Matteo PhD, Bernard Cole PhD
{"title":"Implementation strategies to improve posttraumatic stress disorder care in rural veterans","authors":"Nancy C. Bernardy PhD,&nbsp;Lisa-Ann J. Cuccurullo PsyD,&nbsp;Macgregor Montano PharmD,&nbsp;Michelle Bowen MSW,&nbsp;Kristen Breen BA,&nbsp;Rebecca Matteo PhD,&nbsp;Bernard Cole PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Prior research has noted treatment inequalities in the care of rural veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This project sought to increase the delivery, or reach, of recommended PTSD treatments in 2 rural health care systems of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) using implementation facilitation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The quality improvement project involved 6 months of facilitation to 2 low-reach PTSD clinics within 2 VA health care systems. The clinics were matched to a control clinic at another regional system similar in reach, rurality, and patient volume. We compared the delivery of evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for PTSD at 3 timepoints: baseline, 6 months, and 1 year using difference-in-difference effect estimation. Facilitators and barriers of EBP reach were identified through interviews with clinic staff and informed specific implementation plans. We also measured reductions in benzodiazepine prescriptions and polypharmacy to determine the impact of an academic detailing intervention aimed at improving PTSD prescribing practices at the 2 sites.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>EBP reach at 6 months more than doubled in the 2 PTSD clinics that received facilitation, while our control clinic experienced a decrease in EBP reach (DID = 24.6; SE = 6.71%). Both intervention clinics identified similar administrative barriers to the delivery of EBPs, offering useful information for improvement at other rural clinics. The use of academic detailing as part of our facilitation intervention further appears to have positively impacted care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this preliminary work, facilitation is a promising strategy for increasing the delivery of PTSD EBPs to veterans seen in under-resourced rural VA clinics.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"40 3","pages":"411-418"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12790","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Prior research has noted treatment inequalities in the care of rural veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This project sought to increase the delivery, or reach, of recommended PTSD treatments in 2 rural health care systems of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) using implementation facilitation.

Methods

The quality improvement project involved 6 months of facilitation to 2 low-reach PTSD clinics within 2 VA health care systems. The clinics were matched to a control clinic at another regional system similar in reach, rurality, and patient volume. We compared the delivery of evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for PTSD at 3 timepoints: baseline, 6 months, and 1 year using difference-in-difference effect estimation. Facilitators and barriers of EBP reach were identified through interviews with clinic staff and informed specific implementation plans. We also measured reductions in benzodiazepine prescriptions and polypharmacy to determine the impact of an academic detailing intervention aimed at improving PTSD prescribing practices at the 2 sites.

Findings

EBP reach at 6 months more than doubled in the 2 PTSD clinics that received facilitation, while our control clinic experienced a decrease in EBP reach (DID = 24.6; SE = 6.71%). Both intervention clinics identified similar administrative barriers to the delivery of EBPs, offering useful information for improvement at other rural clinics. The use of academic detailing as part of our facilitation intervention further appears to have positively impacted care.

Conclusions

In this preliminary work, facilitation is a promising strategy for increasing the delivery of PTSD EBPs to veterans seen in under-resourced rural VA clinics.

改善农村退伍军人创伤后应激障碍护理的实施策略。
目的:先前的研究已经注意到农村退伍军人创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)治疗中的不平等。该项目旨在通过实施促进,在退伍军人事务部(VA)的两个农村医疗保健系统中提高创伤后应激障碍推荐治疗的交付或覆盖率:质量改进项目包括对退伍军人事务部 2 个医疗保健系统中 2 个覆盖率较低的创伤后应激障碍诊所进行为期 6 个月的促进。这些诊所与另一个地区系统中的对照诊所在覆盖范围、地域和患者数量上相似。我们采用差分效应估计法比较了创伤后应激障碍循证心理疗法(EBPs)在基线、6 个月和 1 年 3 个时间点的实施情况。通过对诊所工作人员的访谈,我们确定了 EBP 普及的促进因素和障碍,并为具体的实施计划提供了依据。我们还测量了苯二氮卓处方的减少情况和多药滥用情况,以确定旨在改善这两个地点创伤后应激障碍处方实践的学术细节干预的影响:接受干预的两家创伤后应激障碍诊所在 6 个月内的 EBP 达标率增加了一倍多,而我们的对照诊所的 EBP 达标率则有所下降(DID = 24.6;SE = 6.71%)。两家干预诊所都发现了实施 EBPs 的类似行政障碍,这为其他农村诊所的改进提供了有用的信息。在我们的促进干预中使用学术细节似乎对护理产生了进一步的积极影响:在这项初步工作中,促进是一种很有前途的策略,可以增加向资源不足的农村退伍军人事务部诊所的退伍军人提供创伤后应激障碍 EBPs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信