Meeting Patient Expectations: Assessing Medical Service and Quality of Care Using the SERVQUAL Model in Dermatology Patients at a Single Center in Poland.

Aleksandra Jonkisz, Piotr Karniej, Dorota Maria Krasowska
{"title":"Meeting Patient Expectations: Assessing Medical Service and Quality of Care Using the SERVQUAL Model in Dermatology Patients at a Single Center in Poland.","authors":"Aleksandra Jonkisz,&nbsp;Piotr Karniej,&nbsp;Dorota Maria Krasowska","doi":"10.12659/MSM.941007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND This study applied the SERVQUAL model, a widely recognized tool for assessing the quality of services, to understand the gap between patient expectations and perceptions of care quality among 413 dermatology patients at a single medical center in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study cohort included 413 patients: 195 inpatients and 218 outpatients. The SERVQUAL model's 5 dimensions - reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness, each including multiple specific items - served as our assessment criteria. Patient responses to these items measured the perceived and expected quality of service. The service quality index (SQ), calculated as the difference between perception and expectation ratings, was the study's primary outcome measure. A negative SQ score was interpreted as patient dissatisfaction. RESULTS The study results showed a negative SQ score, which signified a discrepancy between high patient expectations and the actual perceived quality of service. The largest gap was seen in the tangibility dimension. Differences emerged based on treatment setting, with inpatient and outpatient settings showing varying expectations and perceptions. Patient sex and residential location also influenced the tangibility dimension. Employed patients and patients with diminished quality of life had heightened expectations in certain dimensions, while patients below 36 years of age expressed higher expectations in responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. CONCLUSIONS The findings emphasize the critical role of care quality in shaping patients' satisfaction and perception, particularly in dermatology. Using the SERVQUAL model, this study identified the tangibility dimension as an area needing improvement. This insight serves as a stepping stone toward enhancing patient satisfaction by addressing these unmet expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18276,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","volume":"29 ","pages":"e941007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0a/e1/medscimonit-29-e941007.PMC10433781.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.941007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study applied the SERVQUAL model, a widely recognized tool for assessing the quality of services, to understand the gap between patient expectations and perceptions of care quality among 413 dermatology patients at a single medical center in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study cohort included 413 patients: 195 inpatients and 218 outpatients. The SERVQUAL model's 5 dimensions - reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness, each including multiple specific items - served as our assessment criteria. Patient responses to these items measured the perceived and expected quality of service. The service quality index (SQ), calculated as the difference between perception and expectation ratings, was the study's primary outcome measure. A negative SQ score was interpreted as patient dissatisfaction. RESULTS The study results showed a negative SQ score, which signified a discrepancy between high patient expectations and the actual perceived quality of service. The largest gap was seen in the tangibility dimension. Differences emerged based on treatment setting, with inpatient and outpatient settings showing varying expectations and perceptions. Patient sex and residential location also influenced the tangibility dimension. Employed patients and patients with diminished quality of life had heightened expectations in certain dimensions, while patients below 36 years of age expressed higher expectations in responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. CONCLUSIONS The findings emphasize the critical role of care quality in shaping patients' satisfaction and perception, particularly in dermatology. Using the SERVQUAL model, this study identified the tangibility dimension as an area needing improvement. This insight serves as a stepping stone toward enhancing patient satisfaction by addressing these unmet expectations.

满足病人的期望:评估医疗服务和护理质量使用SERVQUAL模型皮肤病患者在波兰的一个中心。
本研究应用SERVQUAL模型(一种广泛认可的服务质量评估工具)来了解波兰一家医疗中心413名皮肤病患者对护理质量的期望和认知之间的差距。材料与方法研究队列包括413例患者:195例住院患者和218例门诊患者。SERVQUAL模型的5个维度——可靠性、保证性、有形性、共情性和响应性,每个维度都包括多个具体项目——作为我们的评估标准。患者对这些项目的反应衡量了感知和期望的服务质量。服务质量指数(SQ)是该研究的主要结果衡量指标,以感知和期望评级之间的差异计算。SQ得分为负被解释为患者不满意。结果研究结果显示SQ得分为负,这表明患者的高期望与实际感知的服务质量之间存在差异。最大的差距出现在有形维度。基于治疗环境的差异出现了,住院和门诊设置显示不同的期望和看法。患者性别和居住地点也影响有形维度。受雇患者和生活质量下降的患者在某些方面的期望更高,而36岁以下的患者在反应能力、保证和同理心方面的期望更高。结论:研究结果强调了护理质量在塑造患者满意度和感知方面的关键作用,特别是在皮肤科。使用SERVQUAL模型,本研究确定了有形维度是一个需要改进的领域。这种洞察力是通过解决这些未满足的期望来提高患者满意度的垫脚石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信