Mechanistic insights into the inhibition of human placental glutathione S-transferase P1-1 by abscisic and gibberellic acids: An integrated experimental and computational study
Mohammad Abu Zaid, Ozlem Dalmizrak, Kerem Teralı, Nazmi Ozer
{"title":"Mechanistic insights into the inhibition of human placental glutathione S-transferase P1-1 by abscisic and gibberellic acids: An integrated experimental and computational study","authors":"Mohammad Abu Zaid, Ozlem Dalmizrak, Kerem Teralı, Nazmi Ozer","doi":"10.1002/jmr.3050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The interactions of the classic phytohormones gibberellic acid (gibberellin A<sub>3</sub>, GA<sub>3</sub>) and abscisic acid (dormin, ABA), which antagonistically regulate several developmental processes and stress responses in higher plants, with human placental glutathione <i>S</i>-transferase P1-1 (<i>hp</i>GSTP1-1), an enzyme that plays a role in endo- or xenobiotic detoxification and regulation of cell survival and apoptosis, were investigated. The inhibitory potencies of ABA and GA<sub>3</sub> against <i>hp</i>GSTP1, as well as the types of inhibition and the kinetic parameters, were determined by making use of both enzyme kinetic graphs and SPSS nonlinear regression models. The structural basis for the interaction between <i>hp</i>GSTP1-1 and phytohormones was predicted with the aid of molecular docking simulations. The <i>IC</i><sub>50</sub> values of ABA and GA<sub>3</sub> were 5.3 and 5.0 mM, respectively. Both phytohormones inhibited <i>hp</i>GSTP1-1 in competitive manner with respect to the cosubstrates GSH and CDNB. When ABA was the inhibitor at [CDNB]<sub>f</sub>–[GSH]<sub>v</sub> and at [GSH]<sub>f</sub>–[CDNB]<sub>v</sub>, <i>V</i><sub>m</sub>, <i>K</i><sub>m</sub>, and <i>K</i><sub>i</sub> values were statistically estimated to be 205 ± 16 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.32 ± 0.18 mM, 1.95 ± 0.25 mM and 175 ± 6 μmol/min-mg protein, 0.85 ± 0.06 mM, 1.85 ± 0.16 mM, respectively. On the other hand, the kinetic parameters <i>V</i><sub>m</sub>, <i>K</i><sub>m</sub>, and <i>K</i><sub>i</sub> obtained with GA<sub>3</sub> at [CDNB]<sub>f</sub>–[GSH]<sub>v</sub> and at [GSH]<sub>f</sub>–[CDNB]<sub>v</sub> were found to be 303 ± 14 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.77 ± 0.13 mM, 3.38 ± 0.26 mM and 249 ± 7 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.43 ± 0.07 mM, 2.89 ± 0.19 mM, respectively. Both phytohormones had the potential to engage in hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic interactions with the key residues that line the G- and H-sites of the enzyme's catalytic center. Inhibitory actions of ABA/GA<sub>3</sub> on <i>hp</i>GSTP1-1 may guide medicinal chemists through the structure-based design of novel antineoplastic agents. It should be noted, however, that the same interactions may also render fetuses vulnerable to the potentially toxic effects of xenobiotics and noxious endobiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Recognition","volume":"36 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmr.3050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The interactions of the classic phytohormones gibberellic acid (gibberellin A3, GA3) and abscisic acid (dormin, ABA), which antagonistically regulate several developmental processes and stress responses in higher plants, with human placental glutathione S-transferase P1-1 (hpGSTP1-1), an enzyme that plays a role in endo- or xenobiotic detoxification and regulation of cell survival and apoptosis, were investigated. The inhibitory potencies of ABA and GA3 against hpGSTP1, as well as the types of inhibition and the kinetic parameters, were determined by making use of both enzyme kinetic graphs and SPSS nonlinear regression models. The structural basis for the interaction between hpGSTP1-1 and phytohormones was predicted with the aid of molecular docking simulations. The IC50 values of ABA and GA3 were 5.3 and 5.0 mM, respectively. Both phytohormones inhibited hpGSTP1-1 in competitive manner with respect to the cosubstrates GSH and CDNB. When ABA was the inhibitor at [CDNB]f–[GSH]v and at [GSH]f–[CDNB]v, Vm, Km, and Ki values were statistically estimated to be 205 ± 16 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.32 ± 0.18 mM, 1.95 ± 0.25 mM and 175 ± 6 μmol/min-mg protein, 0.85 ± 0.06 mM, 1.85 ± 0.16 mM, respectively. On the other hand, the kinetic parameters Vm, Km, and Ki obtained with GA3 at [CDNB]f–[GSH]v and at [GSH]f–[CDNB]v were found to be 303 ± 14 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.77 ± 0.13 mM, 3.38 ± 0.26 mM and 249 ± 7 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.43 ± 0.07 mM, 2.89 ± 0.19 mM, respectively. Both phytohormones had the potential to engage in hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic interactions with the key residues that line the G- and H-sites of the enzyme's catalytic center. Inhibitory actions of ABA/GA3 on hpGSTP1-1 may guide medicinal chemists through the structure-based design of novel antineoplastic agents. It should be noted, however, that the same interactions may also render fetuses vulnerable to the potentially toxic effects of xenobiotics and noxious endobiotics.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Molecular Recognition (JMR) publishes original research papers and reviews describing substantial advances in our understanding of molecular recognition phenomena in life sciences, covering all aspects from biochemistry, molecular biology, medicine, and biophysics. The research may employ experimental, theoretical and/or computational approaches.
The focus of the journal is on recognition phenomena involving biomolecules and their biological / biochemical partners rather than on the recognition of metal ions or inorganic compounds. Molecular recognition involves non-covalent specific interactions between two or more biological molecules, molecular aggregates, cellular modules or organelles, as exemplified by receptor-ligand, antigen-antibody, nucleic acid-protein, sugar-lectin, to mention just a few of the possible interactions. The journal invites manuscripts that aim to achieve a complete description of molecular recognition mechanisms between well-characterized biomolecules in terms of structure, dynamics and biological activity. Such studies may help the future development of new drugs and vaccines, although the experimental testing of new drugs and vaccines falls outside the scope of the journal. Manuscripts that describe the application of standard approaches and techniques to design or model new molecular entities or to describe interactions between biomolecules, but do not provide new insights into molecular recognition processes will not be considered. Similarly, manuscripts involving biomolecules uncharacterized at the sequence level (e.g. calf thymus DNA) will not be considered.